Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Correction factor determination, screening

Appendix 8.A.4 Determination of Correction Factor for Screening Cut Point Evaluation... [Pg.230]

In order to determine the efficiency of the screens, the front-to-back ratio (F/B) of activities and a loss factor (SL) by which one multiplies to correct for loss in the screens (the alpha particles absorbed in a screen that cannot be detected either during the front or back measurements, see figure 1) have to be determined. Experimentally, this was accomplished by two methods ... [Pg.350]

We discuss briefly the factors that determine the intensity of the scattered ions. During collision, a low energy ion does not penetrate the target atom as deeply as in RBS. As a consequence, the ion feels the attenuated repulsion by the positive nucleus of the target atom, because the electrons screen it. In fact, in a head-on collision with Cu, a He+ ion would need to have about 100 keV energy to penetrate within the inner electron shell (the K or Is shell). An approximately correct potential for the interaction is the following modified Coulomb potential [lj ... [Pg.119]

In all types of machine the weight of plastisol and the qualities of coating and printing are determined by a correct balance of the following factors type of screen... [Pg.297]

Caco-2 cell monolayers or other cell lines as well as intrinsic clearance determination (half-lives) for structure/stability evaluation. The overall strategy for the industry is to use this screening tool as efficiently as possible, and not necessarily for all compounds in the chemical library. The standardised systems have a high throughput where thousands of chemical compounds can be tested in a short period of time and where the time for feedback into the projects is the most important success factor. Because of the importance of the measured values resulting from such assays for a forthcoming candidate drug selection, the importance of the assay for correct prediction of the human situation becomes evident. [Pg.143]

The field itself is of course the primary parameter that must be known. Experimentally it is the voltage between tip and screen that is determined. However, a fairly accurate value ( 15%) of the field a few atom spacings above the surface can be derived from the over-all shape of the emitter, by procedures already worked out for field electron microscopy (44 b). At a given atom site, a inicrofield value can then be estimated from the geometry. Thus for a hemispherical knob on a plane, the field is enhanced by a factor of 3, at a kink site on a crystal surface, the enhancement has been estimated at 1.8. This procedure yields microfields in fair agreement with those estimated from Eq. (49) without any polarization correction (78). Refinements are still in order, however, when dealing with gas adatoms. [Pg.365]


See other pages where Correction factor determination, screening is mentioned: [Pg.230]    [Pg.406]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.258]    [Pg.613]    [Pg.396]    [Pg.515]    [Pg.777]    [Pg.580]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.466]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.453]    [Pg.285]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.840]    [Pg.396]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.437]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.380]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.254]    [Pg.557]    [Pg.597]    [Pg.445]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.625]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.635]    [Pg.217]   


SEARCH



Correction factors

Determinant factor

Factors determining

Factors screening

Screen factor

Screening corrections

© 2024 chempedia.info