Conventional Control Structure Selection

A conventional contiol system is applied to the column. Feed is flow-controlled. Pressure in the reflux drum is controlled by condenser heat removal. Reflux-drum level is control by manipulating distillate flow rate. Base level is controlled by manipulating bottoms flow rate. 

There are two remaining control degrees of freedom. The ideal dual-composition control structure would control C5 impurity in the distillate by manipulating reflux flow rate and C4 impurity in the bottoms by manipulating reboiler duty. However, this ideal control structure is the exception not the rule in industrial applications. We usually try to find a more simple control structure in which a single-end control scheme provides adequate regulatory control using a suitable tray temperature. 

However, these ratios do not stay constant when feed composition changes occur. Many of the tray compositions must change also. So the critical disturbance that the control structure must be able to handle is feed composition changes. In some columns, dualcomposition control may be needed. In others a more simple structure may be adequate. 

Then the feed composition is changed to 0.6 mole fraction nC4 and 0.4 mole fraction C5 with the product specification held constant. The required reflux ratio and reflux-to-feed ratio are 1.075 and 0.6471, respectively. Next the feed composition is changed to 0.4 mole fraction C4 and 0.6 mole fraction nC5 with the product specification held constant. The required reflux ratio and reflux-to-feed ratio change to 1.665 and 0.6626, respectively. The third and flfth columns in Table 16.1 show the percent changes in the two variables from the design values. Since the changes in the reflux-to-feed ratio are quite small, a single-end control structure may be able to handle feed composition disturbances fairly well. 

Feed Composition (mol% C4) Reflux Ratio Percent Change from Design Reflux-to-Feed Ratio Percent Change from Design 

---

So the basic conventional control structure selected has reflux-to-feed ratio. This is implemented in Aspen Dynamics using a multiplier block (R/F) with one input being the molar flow rate of feed and the other input the specified reflux-to-feed molar ratio. Since Aspen Dynamics has the rather odd limitation of only being able to directly specify the mass flow rate of the reflux, a flow controller must be installed whose process variable signal is the reflux molar flow rate, and whose output signal is the reflux mass flow rate. This flow controller is put onto cascade with its set point signal coming from the R/F multiplier. 

CONVENTIONAL CONTROL STRUCTURE SELECTION 449 50% Feed increase TC with and w/o QR/F ratio... 

In this section a Fluid Catalytic Cracking (FCC) process case study is examined. The aim is to compare the alternative methodologies for regulatory control structure selection presented in sections 2 and 3. The FCC process is particularly suited for this purpose. The process d3mamics described by a low order but highly non-linear set of DAEs. The actual operation of the process is dominated by economics and a small number of disturbances that affect significantly its economics has been identified. Furthermore, the most appropriate control structure for this process is a matter of some controversy, with the conventional structure being criticized in a number of recent publications. 

Many of the catalysts which are usefiil in Fischer-Tropsch synthesis are also capable of catalyzing the hydrogenation of CO2 to hydrocarbons. Our structure-function studies have shown that it is possible to control the selectivity of CO2 hydrogenation by specific iron-based catalysts to generate yields of C5+ hydrocarbons that are comparable to those produced with conventional CO based... 

Block copolymers provide impact strength in conventional high-impact polystyrene interpolymers. " The phase structure can be precisely controlled by selective solvation to form micelles. An optimum size and volume of the phase inclusions can be accomplished. In melt blending, styrene-diene block polymers can form disperse impact absorbing phases in polystyrene and polyolefins polymers. 

Radical polymerization is often the preferred mechanism for forming polymers and most commercial polymer materials involve radical chemistry at some stage of their production cycle. From both economic and practical viewpoints, the advantages of radical over other forms of polymerization arc many (Chapter 1). However, one of the often-cited "problems" with radical polymerization is a perceived lack of control over the process the inability to precisely control molecular weight and distribution, limited capacity to make complex architectures and the range of undefined defect structures and other forms of "structure irregularity" that may be present in polymers prepared by this mechanism. Much research has been directed at providing answers for problems of this nature. In this, and in the subsequent chapter, we detail the current status of the efforts to redress these issues. In this chapter, wc focus on how to achieve control by appropriate selection of the reaction conditions in conventional radical polymerization. 

At locations where aboveground blending takes place, the resulting soil material can be placed back in the original excavation (or selected location) and compacted to the desired density. If the solidified material is to have a desired structural strength (i.e, subbase, pavement, controlled fill, etc.) it can be compacted by conventional construction equipment (vibrating or sheeps-foot rollers). 

Abstract Polyfunctionality of carbohydrates and their low solubility in conventional organic solvents make rather complex their conversion to higher value added chemicals. Therefore, innovative processes are now strongly needed in order to increase the selectivity of these reactions. Here, we report an overview of the different heterogeneously-catalyzed processes described in the literature. In particular, hydrolysis, dehydration, oxidation, esterification, and etherification of carbohydrates are presented. We shall discuss the main structural parameters that need to be controlled and that permit the conversion of carbohydrates to bioproducts with good selectivity. The conversion of monosaccharides and disaccharides over solid catalysts, as well as recent advances in the heterogeneously-catalyzed conversion of cellulose, will be presented. 

---