Controller design model predictive

I/O data-based prediction model can be obtained in one step from collected past input and output data. However, thiCTe stiU exists a problem to be resolved. This prediction model does not require any stochastic observer to calculate the predicted output over one prediction horiajn. This feature can provide simplicity for control designer but in the pr ence of significant process or measurement noise, it can bring about too noise sensitive controller, i.e., file control input is also suppose to oscillate due to the noise of measursd output... 

Off-line analysis, controller design, and optimization are now performed in the area of dynamics. The largest dynamic simulation has been about 100,000 differential algebraic equations (DAEs) for analysis of control systems. Simulations formulated with process models having over 10,000 DAEs are considered frequently. Also, detailed training simulators have models with over 10,000 DAEs. On-line model predictive control (MPC) and nonlinear MPC using first-principle models are seeing a number of industrial applications, particularly in polymeric reactions and processes. At this point, systems with over 100 DAEs have been implemented for on-line dynamic optimization and control. 

For this example, the controller design was carried out using the MATLAB Model Predictive Control toolbox, which includes a QP solver. Three cases were considered in the preceding problem statement. 

Finally, a steady 1-D lumped stack model is introduced which uses a 0-D lumped approach for each cell in the stack. The model takes the current and power produced by each cell in the stack as input and predicts the 1 -D temperature distribution across the cells of the stack. Such models have the advantage of faster calculation time and are thus better suited for initial design calculations and control system modeling. In this model, each fuel cell is divided into three components, air channel, fuel channel and solid region (electrodes, electrolyte and the interconnect). The control volumes used for air and fuel channel components are shown by the dashed lines in Figure 5.6. The specie concentrations at the exit of air and fuel channels could be calculated using the mass and specie balances for these control volumes which are in the form... 

Model Predictive Control Design and Implementation Using MATLAB Liuping Wang... 

Closed-loop multivariable boiler control has to be planned and performed carefully because plant operators are not traditionally willing to reduce air-fuel ratios due to concerns about CO and other symptoms associated with Oz-deficient combustion. Model predictive control (MPC) is by far the most widely used technique for conducting multivariable boiler optimization and control. Forms of MPC that are inherently multivariable and that include real-time constrained optimization in the design are best suited for boiler application. 

Plant-wide control is concerned with designing control systems for a large number of individual process units that may be highly interacting. A typical plant-wide control system will consist of many single-loop controllers as well as multi-variable controllers such as Model Predictive Control (MPC),1 10 and may involve thousands of measurements, hundreds to thousands of manipulated variables and hundreds of disturbance variables. Fortunately, a plant with a large number of processing units can be analysed as smaller clusters of units. 

Wave models were successfully used for the design of a supervisory control system for automatic start-up of the coupled column system shown in Fig. 5.15 [19] and for model-based measurement and online optimization of distillation columns using nonlinear model predictive control [15], The approach was also extended to reactive distillation processes by using transformed concentration variables [22], However, in reactive - as in nonreactive - distillation, the approach applies only to processes with constant pattern waves, which must be checked first. 

However, the stiffness/ill conditioning of the model (3.31) will strongly impact on the implementation of optimization controllers (e.g., a model predictive controller) (Baldea et al. 2010). On the other hand, for any choice of four flow rates as manipulated inputs (keeping the remaining one constant at its nominal value), the system is non-minimum phase (Kumar and Daoutidis 2002) and thus potentially closed-loop unstable with an inversion-based controller.3 As discussed in the previous section, a more systematic controller-design approach would... 

Of course, in model predictive control, the structuring problem is less important. The controller is centralized and reliability is achieved through on-line optimization. There are many cases, however, in which the modeling and design effort necessary for model predictive control is either impossible or cannot be justified economically. 

Very few unbiased publications have appeared in the literature comparing control effectiveness using MPC versus a well-designed conventional control system. Most of the MPC applications reported have considered fairly simple processes with a small number of manipulated variables. There are no published reports that discuss the application of MPC to an entire complex chemical plant, with one notable exception. That is the work of Ricker (1996), who compared MPC with conventional PI control for the Eastman process (TE problem). His conclusion was there appears to be little, if any, advantage to the use of nonlinear model predictive control (NMPC) in this application. In particular, the decentralized strategy does a better job of handling constraints—an area in which NMPC is reputed to excel.51... 

Genceli, H. and Nikolaou, M., Design of robust constrained nonlinear model predictive controllers with Volterra series, AIChE J. 41, 9, 2098-2107 (1995). 

Model predictive control (MFC) is a very widely used process control technology for process plants. They have been in use for many years before there was a sound understanding of how they work, and what their limitations are. There is now a firm foundation on MFC theory, which promises to push the envelope in plant design and implementation. We should not... 

---