Controlled-current techniques principles

The difficulties in conventional polarography as mentioned in Section 3.3.1.1, especially the interference due to the charging current, have led to a series of most interesting developments by means of which these problems can be solved in various ways and to different extents. The newer methods concerned can be divided into controlled-potential techniques and controlled-current techniques. A more striking and practical division is the distinction between advanced DC polarography and AC polarography. These divisions and their further classification are illustrated in Table 3.1. In treating the different classes we have not applied a net separation between their principles, theory and practice, because these aspects are far too interrelated within each class. 

A complete comprehension of Single Pulse electrochemical techniques is fundamental for the study of more complex techniques that will be analyzed in the following chapters. Hence, the concept of half-wave potential, for example, will be defined here and then characterized in all electrochemical techniques [1, 3, 8]. Moreover, when very small electrodes are used, a stationary current-potential response is reached. This is independent of the conditions of the system prior to each potential step and even of the way the current-potential was obtained (i.e., by means of a controlled potential technique or a controlled current one) [9, 10]. So, the stationary solutions deduced in this chapter for the current-potential curves for single potential step techniques are applicable to any multipotential step or sweep technique such as Staircase Voltammetry or Cyclic Voltammetry. Moreover, many of the functional dependences shown in this chapter for different diffusion fields are maintained in the following chapters when multipulse techniques are described if the superposition principle can be applied. 

The principle of controlled current electrolysis has been known since the beginning of this century.21 However, the utilization of this form of electrochemistry remained dormant for 50 years until three groups of investigators illustrated its many advantages for analytical and physicochemical measurements.22 24 Several works describe this technique in detail,25"27 and other re-... 

The purpose of this monograph, the first to be dedicated exclusively to the analytics of additives in polymers, is to evaluate critically the extensive problemsolving experience in the polymer industry. Although this book is not intended to be a treatise on modem analytical tools in general or on polymer analysis en large, an outline of the principles and characteristics of relevant instrumental techniques (without hands-on details) was deemed necessary to clarify the current state-of-the-art of the analysis of additives in polymers and to accustom the reader to the unavoidable professional nomenclature. The book, which provides an in-depth overview of additive analysis by focusing on a wide array of applications in R D, production, quality control and technical service, reflects the recent explosive development of the field. Rather than being a compendium, cookery book or laboratory manual for qualitative and/or quantitative analysis of specific additives in a variety of commercial polymers, with no limits to impractical academic exoticism (analysis for its own sake), the book focuses on the fundamental characteristics of the arsenal of techniques utilised industrially in direct relation... 

It seems likely that further improvements in this coordination polymerization technique will require design of more active catalysts. The catalyst systems currently available are very amenable to modifications that dramatically influence dehydrocoupling rates. Significantly, results so far indicate that there is no inherent limitation to molecular weight control via polymerizations of this type, and in principle it should be possible to identify conditions and catalysts that allow production of high polymers. 

It is reasonable to ask at this point Are there other approaches to reach stability with grace in true potentiostatic circuits The answer is indeed affirmative, but unfortunately with qualifications. One technique is discontinuous control of cell potential. It is not a new approach it was, in fact, the method used in the very first electronic potentiostat by Hickling in 1942. The principle is quite simple Current pulses are applied to the counterelectrode so that the desired potential is maintained between reference and working electrode. Since the potential can be measured between pulses, there is no iR drop. Cell potential is not steady it depends on the sensitivity of the comparator circuit and the rate at which current demand can be met. 

A sensitivity increase and lower detection limit can be achieved in various ways with the use of voltammetric detectors rather than amperometry at fixed potential or with slow sweep. The principle of some of these methods was already mentioned application of a pulse waveform (Chapter 10) and a.c. voltammetry (Chapter 11). There is, nevertheless, another possibility—the utilization of a pre-concentration step that accumulates the electroactive species on the electrode surface before its quantitative determination, a determination that can be carried out by control of applied current, of applied potential or at open circuit. These pre-concentration (or stripping) techniques24"26 have been used for cations and some anions and complexing neutral species, the detection limit being of the order of 10-10m. They are thus excellent techniques for the determination of chemical species at trace levels, and also for speciation studies. At these levels the purity of the water and of the... 

The scanning electrochemical microscopy (SECM) technique introduced in recent years by Allen Bard is another area where the smallness of the electrode is essential [38]. The principle in SECM is a mobile UME inserted in an electrolyte solution. The UME is normally operated in a potentiostatic manner in an unstirred solution so that the current recorded is controlled solely by the spherical diffusion of the probed substance to the UME. The current can be quantified from Eqs. 48, 49, or 89 as long as the electrode is positioned far from other interfaces. However, if a solid body is present in the electrolyte solution, the diffusion of the substance to the UME is altered. For instance, when the position of the UME is lowered in the z direction, that is, towards the surface of the object, the diffusion will be partially blocked and the current decreases. By monitoring of the current while the electrode is moved in the x-y plane, the topology of the object can be graphed. The spatial resolution is about 0.25 pm. In one investigation carried out by Bard et al, the... 

---