Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Contours response

Figure 1. Flare intensity contour responses at a fixed binder level of. 05. Figure 1. Flare intensity contour responses at a fixed binder level of. 05.
Good detection The operator has to give a response to the vicinity of a contour ... [Pg.526]

Unique response A contour has to provoke an unique response of the operator. [Pg.526]

Example of a two-factor response surface displayed as (a) a pseudo-three-dimensional graph and (b) a contour plot. Contour lines are shown for intervals of 0.5 response units. [Pg.668]

FIG. 20-78 Reaction in compacts of magnesium carbonate when pressed (P = 671 kg/cnr ). (a) Stress contour levels in kilograms per square centimeter, (h) Density contours in percent solids, (c) Reaction force developed at wedge responsible for stress and density patterns. [Tf ain, Trans. Inst. Cbem. Eng. (London), 35, 258 (1957).]... [Pg.1890]

The Nichols chart shown in Figure 6.26 is a rectangular plot of open-loop phase on the x-axis against open-loop modulus (dB) on the jr-axis. M and N contours are superimposed so that open-loop and closed-loop frequency response characteristics can be evaluated simultaneously. Like the Bode diagram, the effect of increasing the open-loop gain constant K is to move the open-loop frequency response locus in the y-direction. The Nichols chart is one of the most useful tools in frequency domain analysis. [Pg.175]

From Figure 6.27 it can be seen that the peak modulus Mp is 4dB, occurring at ujp = 1.63rad/s. The bandwidth is 2.2rad/s. For the best flatband response, the open-loop frequency response locus should follow the 0 dB M contour for as wide... [Pg.176]

The open-loop frequency response contours for the compensator given in equation (6.109) are curves (b) in Figures 6.34 and 6.35 which produce... [Pg.185]

EMGRESP is a source-term and dispersion emergency response screening tool for calculating downwind contours with a minimum of user input and computational expense in the event of a release of a hazardous chemical. The program provides hazardous contaminant information, calculates toxic concentrations at various distances downwind of a release, and c" the... [Pg.352]

As previously stated, the ear can respond from 20 Hz to 200 kHz, and this response can be demonstrated by equalloudness contours (Figure 42.3). It can be seen from the figure that there is a loss in sensitivity (compared to 2 kHz) of approximately 60 dB at the low-frequency end of the... [Pg.652]

In order to understand the relationship between the mixture component, physical properties and consumer acceptance of the lipstick, various lipstick formulations have to be produced. The physical properties of each formulation should be studied. The consumer acceptance towards the product also should be investigated. However, only a part of this work will be discussed in this paper. Here, natural waxes, oils and solvent have been used to produce natural ingredient based lipstick formulations based on the formulation suggested by the statistical mixture design. Contour plot and response surface graph were formed in order to understand the relationship between the mixture component and physical characteristic of the lipstick. [Pg.694]

The chain dimension in the height direction was evaluated as the thickness of the brush layer, I, relative to the chain contour length, io, by atomic force microscopy (AFM). Figure 4.10 shows the solvent dependence of the conformation of the PMMA brush. Whereas the brush chain changes its conformation in response to the solvent quality at the low graft density, the high-density PMMA brush does not show... [Pg.65]

Figure 38.19 shows the contour plots of the foaming behaviour, uniformity of air cells and the sweetness of a whipped topping based on peanut milk with varying com syrup and fat concentrations [16]. Clearly, fat is the most important variable determining foam (Fig. 38.19A), whereas com syrap concentration determines sweetness (Fig. 38.19C). It is rather the mle than the exception that more than one sensory attribute are needed to describe the sensory characteristics of a product. An effective way to make a final choice is to overlay the contour plots associated with the response surfaces for the various plots. If one indicates in each contour plot which regions are preferred, then in the overlay a window region of products with acceptable properties is left (see Fig. 38.19D and Sections 24.5 and 26.4). In the... Figure 38.19 shows the contour plots of the foaming behaviour, uniformity of air cells and the sweetness of a whipped topping based on peanut milk with varying com syrup and fat concentrations [16]. Clearly, fat is the most important variable determining foam (Fig. 38.19A), whereas com syrap concentration determines sweetness (Fig. 38.19C). It is rather the mle than the exception that more than one sensory attribute are needed to describe the sensory characteristics of a product. An effective way to make a final choice is to overlay the contour plots associated with the response surfaces for the various plots. If one indicates in each contour plot which regions are preferred, then in the overlay a window region of products with acceptable properties is left (see Fig. 38.19D and Sections 24.5 and 26.4). In the...
A graphic technique may be obtained from the polynomial equations, as represented in Fig. 6. Figure 6a shows the contours for tablet hardness as the levels of the independent variables are changed. Figure 6b shows similar contours for the dissolution response, t50%. If the requirements on the final tablet are that hardness be 8-10 kg and t o% be 20-33 min, the feasible solution space is indicated in Fig. 6c. This has been obtained by superimposing Fig. 6a and b, and several different combinations of X and X2 will suffice. [Pg.613]

Contour plots (Fig. 13) are also generated in the same mariner. The specific response is noted on the graph,... [Pg.618]

Fig. 13 Contour plots for (a) disintegration time (b) tablet hardness (c) dissolution response (%) (d) tablet friability as a function of disintegrant level and compressional force. Dashed lines on ordinate denote limits of experimental range (—1.547 to + 1.547 eu see text for details). Fig. 13 Contour plots for (a) disintegration time (b) tablet hardness (c) dissolution response (%) (d) tablet friability as a function of disintegrant level and compressional force. Dashed lines on ordinate denote limits of experimental range (—1.547 to + 1.547 eu see text for details).
Fig. 5.3. Contour plot of the response surface y = f(xi,x2) the optimum is situated at point x (a) Response curves of y in dependence of x as result of a first run (b) and x2 as result of a second run (c)... Fig. 5.3. Contour plot of the response surface y = f(xi,x2) the optimum is situated at point x (a) Response curves of y in dependence of x as result of a first run (b) and x2 as result of a second run (c)...
Figures 5 and 6 show the response surfaces plotted for Property A and Property B, respectively. Note that two variables are plotted at once, with the values of the other variables fixed at levels chosen by the experimenter. The contours in the graph represent constant levels of the response. Fortunately, the computer allows rapid replotting for various levels of the fixed variables, as well as changing the identities of the fixed and floating variables, so that the entire design space can be investigated. Figures 5 and 6 show the response surfaces plotted for Property A and Property B, respectively. Note that two variables are plotted at once, with the values of the other variables fixed at levels chosen by the experimenter. The contours in the graph represent constant levels of the response. Fortunately, the computer allows rapid replotting for various levels of the fixed variables, as well as changing the identities of the fixed and floating variables, so that the entire design space can be investigated.
RESPONSE SURFACE CONTOUR PLOT RESPONSE = PROPT A... [Pg.48]

Figure 5. Response surface contour plot for Property A from Design I. Figure 5. Response surface contour plot for Property A from Design I.

See other pages where Contours response is mentioned: [Pg.66]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.667]    [Pg.670]    [Pg.465]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.392]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.275]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.571]    [Pg.693]    [Pg.695]    [Pg.242]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.214]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.50]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.203 , Pg.204 ]




SEARCH



Constant response, contours

Contour

Contours of constant response

Response contour lines

Response contours, advantages

Response elliptical contours

Response surface models contour plot

© 2024 chempedia.info