Continuous data confidence intervals

The classical, frequentist approach in statistics requires the concept of the sampling distribution of an estimator. In classical statistics, a data set is commonly treated as a random sample from a population. Of course, in some situations the data actually have been collected according to a probability-sampling scheme. Whether that is the case or not, processes generating the data will be snbject to stochastic-ity and variation, which is a sonrce of uncertainty in nse of the data. Therefore, sampling concepts may be invoked in order to provide a model that accounts for the random processes, and that will lead to confidence intervals or standard errors. The population may or may not be conceived as a finite set of individnals. In some situations, such as when forecasting a fnture value, a continuous probability distribution plays the role of the popnlation. 

The previous sections in this chapter are applicable when we are dealing with means. As noted earlier these parameters are relevant when we have continuous, count or score data. With binary data we will be looking to construct confidence intervals for rates or proportions plus differences between those rates. 

A meta-analysis for continuous data cannot be calculated unless the pertinent standard deviations are known. Unfortunately, clinical reports often give the sample size and mean ratings for the various groups but do not report the standard deviations (or standard error of the mean), which are necessary for effect size calculations. Thus, investigators should always report the indices of variability (e.g., confidence intervals, SDs) for the critical variables related to their primary hypothesis. 

An equivalence approach has been and continues to be recommended for BE comparisons. The recommended approach relies on (1) a criterion to allow the comparison, (2) a confidence interval (Cl) for the criterion, and (3) a BE limit. Log-transformation of exposure measures before statistical analysis is recommended. BE studies are performed as single-dose, crossover studies. To compare measures in these studies, data have been analyzed using an average BE criterion. This guidance recommends continued use of an average BE criterion to compare BA measures for replicate and nonreplicate BE studies of both immediate- and modihed-release products. 

Analysis of data obtained in experiments usually starts with the estimation of statistical measures that characterize the range, the mean value, the variance of the data, and their confidence intervals. Sometimes, when the experiment concerns the identification of changes in the distribution of the dependent factor, such as fibre length or fibre diameter distribution, the analysis continues with the estimation of the skewness and kurtosis, which are measures of the distribution symmetry and sharpness, respectively. Table 1.3 summarizes equations for the calculation of statistical measures. In this table Xi,X2,. ..,x . ..,x are individual measurements or observations for a sample of n measurements. 

As can be seen, in each case the lower limit of the two-sided 95 % confidence interval fell below unity (1.00) and the upper limit fell above unity, hence the nonsignificant result. The Data Monitoring Safety Board for the trial considered all interim analyses and recoimnended that the trial continue. 

Therefore the continuous broken function for the data was constructed. The confidence intervals might be also drawn for both an individual value y (see Fig. 4) and a mean value y (see Fig. 5). 

---