Wetting liquids, contact angles with

The ring must be completely wet with the liquid, but with platinum rings suspended by platinum stirrups this is usually easily achieved by flaming the rings gently. The method may be used for interfacial tensions also, but here the contact angle must be carefully watched, as zero contact angles with two liquids are more difficult to obtain than with one liquid only. Vibration must be avoided. 

Not only the surface atomic structure but also its electronic structure is important. In the bulk, QCs are characterized by a suppression in the density of states at the Fermi edge (Fp) known as a pseudogap. There is evidence that the pseudogap is preserved at the bulk-terminated flat surfaces (105, 109, 178-184] and that this strongly influences surface QC properties even in air, such as contact angles with polar liquids (wetting) [12,185,186). 

Many surfaces are not totally wetted, but they form a certain contact angle with the liquid. In this case, less liquid condenses into the pore (Figure 5.2, middle). 

For the solid-liquid system changes of the state of interface on formation of surfactant adsorption layers are of special importance with respect to application aspects. When a liquid is in contact with a solid and surfactant is added, the solid-liquid interface tension will be reduced by the formation of a new solid-liquid interface created by adsorption of surfactant. This influences the wetting as demonstrated by the change of the contact angle between the liquid and the solid surface. The equilibrium at the three-phase contact solid-liquid-air or oil is described by the Young equation ... 

The practical importance of monolayer formation is generally because of its relationship to reduction of surface tension. Air—water surface tension can affect such important phenomena as contact angle with a solid surface (affecting flotation), rate of wetting of a solid, or foaming (with applications in enhanced oil recovery or fire extinguishers), just to name a few. Reduction of air—water surface tension could, for example, cause a liquid to spread on a solid instead of beading up on it. 

The pressure required to prevent liquid from entering a plug of a finely divided solid is twice as great for a liquid of surface tension 50 mN m-1, which completely wets the solid, as it is for a liquid of surface tension 70 mN m-1, which has a finite contact angle with the solid. Calculate this contact angle. 

Besides having to flow from ducts and to split efficiently between rollers, a letterpress ink also has to wet quickly all the surfaces with which it comes into contact. On the press these may be various metals, rubbers, and plastics, while the substrate can be any one of a wide variety of materials. For a liquid to wet a surface it must have a lower surface tension than the substrate. The surface tension of a liquid is related to the contact angle that the liquid makes with the substrate. The contact angle is defined as nil for complete wetting and greater than 90° for increasing non-wetting tendencies. 

An empirical method to estimate the surface tension of a solid is Zisman s plot (cos 9 as a function of yl), which obtains the critical surface tension of wetting. In the absence of specific interaction between the surface and the liquids used for the measurement of contact angles, the critical contact angle of wetting can be accurately estimated and its value used as the surface tension of the surface. However, if a surface interacts with liquids used as the sessile droplet for the contact angle measurement, to the extent that the surface tension is altered, Zisman s plots deviate from the ideal linear relationship. In a strict sense, the plot is applicable only to imperturbable surfaces with which liquid contact does not alter surface configuration, i.e., no surface dynamics applies. 

The equations deduced for contacts between gas, liquid, and solid will obviously apply if G is replaced by another liquid, giving the case of two immiscible liquids in contact with one another in an interface making an angle cr 01 with the solid surface, and each liquid in contact with the solid (Fig. 8.VIII G). In this case the liquid Li, having a contact angle with the solid of less than 90°, is said to wet the solid, whereas the second liquid, with a contact angle greater than 90°, does not. 

A low surface tension value correlates with a small contact angle. The binder with the smaller contact angle has improved spreadabiiity and can wet powders more effectively (65,84). A surfactant can also be added to the binder solution to improve wettability, especially for hydrophobic powders, and functions to lower both the surface tension as well as the contact angle of the liquid. If the contact angle, 6, is less than 90, then the powder wetting is spontaneous. However, if the contact angle is closer to 180 then the powder would be considered unwettable by the liquid. The pore space within a particle assembly can be simplistically considered as a model capillary. The capillary pressure, Pc, of a liquid is related to the surface tension by the following equation ... 

An alternative method for determining the interfacial free energy applies to substances in which the liquid does not wet the crystal at the melting point. In such cases the contact angles, which the liquid drops form with the crystal surface, can be measured and deduced. Zell and Mutaftschiev applied this method first to the (0001) surface of cadmium and more recently to the alkali halides NaCP° and KCP and to mixed alkali halide systems. The number of substances in which the liquid does not wet the solid appears limited, however, so this method cannot be applied in all cases. 

---