Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Construction of the standard model

The developments of the previous chapters provide the ingredients that one can use to construct models of spontaneously broken non-Abelian gauge theories. In Chapters 21-23 we shall discuss quantum chromodynamics (QCD) which is proposed as a model for strong interactions. Here we shall concentrate on models which attempt to unify the weak and electromagnetic interactions into a unique renormalisable theory. [Pg.49]

We first give the general rules to be followed for model building. Then we apply them to the most successful of these models—in fact, the only one that has so far passed all experimental tests— the electroweak standard model (SM) and show how its structure arises. [Pg.49]

In the literature, the term standard model sometimes refers to the combination of the electroweak sector with the colour SU(3) theory of strong interaction mentioned above (QCD). In this and in the following chapters, we shall use the term standard model for the purely electroweak part of the theory. The SM is due to various authors (Glashow, 1961 Weinberg, 1967 Salam, 1968) and its predictions are in good agreement with the data. [Pg.49]

With the recent coming into operation of the electron-positron collider (LEP) at CERN, where over 10 Z s are collected in a year of operation, it becomes possible to test the predictions of the SM to a fantastic accuracy. So far, all the evidence is that the SM works incredibly well. [Pg.49]


There are both theoretical and experimental reasons to search for CPT violations. The strong theoretical incentive is that, even though the CPT invariance is required to formulate a quantum field theory consistent with special relativity, it turns out to be difficult to construct a gravitational relativistic quantum field theory of the GUT type with the CPT symmetry maintained. In other words it is difficult to incorporate the CPT invariance in the GUT-type extensions of the Standard Model. [Pg.191]

Within the standard PB equation ions are represented as point charges. The construction of the PB model starts from the Poisson equation... [Pg.213]

However, many questions still remain open, requiring more research effort to be invested. The main directions that concern in the short to medium term revolve around the following (a) a methodology that allows an efficient (even automatic) construction of the necessary models and semantic bridges (b) standardized, domain-specific extensions which would allow a very short start-up time for projects ... [Pg.92]

The Supplement B (reference) contains a description of the process to render an automatic construction of mathematical models with the application of electronic computer. The research work of the Institute of the applied mathematics of The Academy of Sciences ( Ukraine) was assumed as a basis for the Supplement. The prepared mathematical model provides the possibility to spare strength and to save money, usually spent for the development of the mathematical models of each separate enterprise. The model provides the possibility to execute the works standard forms and records for the non-destructive inspection in complete correspondence with the requirements of the Standard. [Pg.26]

In other cases, there is no strong need to construct a business model before you get on with a component spec, particularly if the software focuses on only one aspect of a very general business. Sometimes it is useful to create the static part of the business model, without any collaborations. For example, before designing a word processor, you first define what a document is. This is the business world in this case—the subject matter with which the software will deal but modeled separately from any concerns of what the software will do with it. This approach is particularly useful when there are standards of interchange between components Web pages, RTF files, floppy disks, and TV pictures all have standard models of the objects without designing the equipment that handles them. [Pg.223]

It must be made clear that WSL has only used olfactometers constructed on its own premises and calibrated by WSL staff one such instrument is the WSL Transportable model. (It is emphasised that this olfactometer is not the same as the commercially-available Portable model.) The WSL Transportable olfactometer and its operation have been described in detail previously (1) and only its main features need be reviewed here. From time to time, certain applications have required a special re-design of the olfactometer, e.g. to measure very weak odours, but the basic principles and the mode of operation have remained unchanged for some years. The main features of the standard WSL Transportable olfactometer are as follows ... [Pg.70]

The similarity of samples can be evaluated by using geometrical constructs based on the standard deviation of the objects modeled by SIMCA. By enclosing classes in volume elements in descriptor space, the SIMCA method provides information about the existence of similarities among the members of the defined classes. Relations among samples, when visualized in this way, increase one s ability to formulate questions or hypotheses about the data being examined. The selection of variables on the basis of MPOW also provides clues as to how samples within a class are similar, and the derived class model describes how the objects are similar, with regard to the internal variation of these variables. [Pg.208]

A standard assumption in QSAR studies is that the models describing the data are linear. It is from this standpoint that transformations are performed on the bioactivities to achieve linearity before construction of the models. The assumption of linearity is made for each case based on theoretical considerations or the examination of scatter plots of experimental values plotted against each predicted value where the relationship between the data points appears to be nonlinear. The transformation of the bioactivity data may be necessary if theoretical considerations specify that the relationship between the two variables... [Pg.142]

We now mrn to the question of whether the district court erred in adopting an individual rights or standard model as the basis of its construction of the Second Amendment. [Pg.287]

The central five-membered ring of Manzamine A (315), a member of a family of antileukimic and antibacterial marine polycyclic alkaloids, has been constructed using intramolecular azomethine ylide technology (88). Model studies on the construction of the central ABC rings, by condensation of the aldehyde 316 prepared by standard chemistry with sarcosine ethyl ester, furnished the desired ABC ring system as a single diastereoisomer in 45% yield (Scheme 3.105). [Pg.236]

In the context of the EHCF construct described in the previous Section, the problem of semiempirical modelling of TMCs electronic structure is seen in a perspective somewhat different from that of the standard HFR MO LCAO-based setting. The EHCF provides a framework which implicitly contains the crucial element of the theory the block of the two-electron density matrix cumulant related to the d-shell. Instead of hardly systematic attempts to extend a parameterization to the transition metals it is now... [Pg.481]

In the response surface strategy that was discussed in Section 2.3 standard response surface techniques are used to generate two response surface models, one for the mean response and one for the standard deviation of the response (or some function of the standard deviation). The standard deviation measures the stability of the response to the environmental variation. Standard analysis can reveal which factors affect the mean only, which only affect the variability, and which affect both the mean and the variability. The researcher can then apply optimization methods or construct contour plots of the mean and standard deviation response surfaces to determine settings of the design variables that will give a mean response that is close to the target with minimum variation. [Pg.74]

For these phenomena numerical models are constructed. Usually, however, ohe discusses in detail the local physics as the fundamental assumptions, and then jumps into presenting numerical model. The logical connection between them are not clear at all. To make it worse people are apt to be fond of more detailed models. Though it is easy for computers to take less essential effects into account, they often obscure important physical processes. In the traditional physics, on the contrary, idealization was intentionally done to extract essentials. In astronomy, of course, standard models in which everything is taken into computation are... [Pg.464]

Over the last years, the basic concepts embedded within the SCRF formalism have undergone some significant improvements, and there are several commonly used variants on this idea. To exemplify the different methods and how their results differ, one recent work from this group [52] considered the sensitivity of results to the particular variant chosen. Due to its dependence upon only the dipole moment of the solute, the older approach is referred to herein as the dipole variant. The dipole method is also crude in the sense that the solute is placed in a spherical cavity within the solute medium, not a very realistic shape in most cases. The polarizable continuum method (PCM) [53,54,55] embeds the solute in a cavity that more accurately mimics the shape of the molecule, created by a series of overlapping spheres. The reaction field is represented by an apparent surface charge approach. The standard PCM approach utilizes an integral equation formulation (IEF) [56,57], A variant of this method is the conductor-polarized continuum model (CPCM) [58] wherein the apparent charges distributed on the cavity surface are such that the total electrostatic potential cancels on the surface. The self-consistent isodensity PCM procedure [59] determines the cavity self-consistently from an isodensity surface. The UAHF (United Atom model for Hartree-Fock/6-31 G ) definition [60] was used for the construction of the solute cavity. [Pg.410]


See other pages where Construction of the standard model is mentioned: [Pg.49]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.347]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.411]    [Pg.219]    [Pg.408]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.288]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.349]    [Pg.952]    [Pg.412]    [Pg.526]    [Pg.532]    [Pg.313]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.458]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.438]    [Pg.176]   


SEARCH



Construction model

Construction of the Models

Modeling constructs

Models constructing

Standard Model

The Standard Model

The Standards

© 2024 chempedia.info