Concentration units used description

Concentration is the most common means for describing the composition of a solution in biochemistry. Enzyme kinetic expressions are typically expressed in these concentration units. Unless otherwise noted, this is the method used throughout this text. Nevertheless, other methods for describing compositions are utilized. For example, mole fractions are often used in Job plots. Gases in solution are commonly measured in terms of partial pressures. Below is a brief description of a few of these other conventions or methods. 

It is obvious that a consistent system for the description of concentrations in the gas phase is necessary. Usually, fractional or percentage concentrations are used. Mixing ratios of low concentrated volatile compounds and gases are based on the parts per... unit system. This unit is obsolete but is still used in the current literature. It cannot be utihzed for particle concentrations. Therefore, the WHO (1999) has adopted a mass per volume system with concentrations [C] in mgm . Other units frequently employed to express the concentration of gases include moles per volume or molecules per volume (vanLoon and Duffy, 2000, Kurzweil, 1999). 

Based on their data for sorption onto a lake sediment, Kiewiet et al. (1996) derived an equation predicting sorption coefficients of CnEOms as a functions of alkyl chain length and the number of oxyethylene units. Di Toro et al. (1990) proposed a model for description of sorption of anionic surfactants which includes sorbent properties (organic carbon content, cation exchange capacity, and particle concentration) and the CMC as a function of the solution properties (ionic strength, temperature). The CMC is used as a relative hydrophobicity parameter. Since the model takes the contribution of electrostatic as well as hydrophobic forces explicitly into account, it is an example of an attempt to model surfactant behavior on the basis of the underlying mechanisms. 

A mathematical description of several mutually connected chemical reactions usually requires some simplification. According to Bohm, all reactive intermediates are assumed to exist in a stationary state, and all rate constants are assumed to be independent of the length of the growing macromolecules. As the derived expressions should also describe heterogeneous polymerizations, the author used the numbers of particles in unit volume of reacting medium instead of concentrations. Some expressions can be simplified in this... 

Table II gives a general description of the program features such as total number of elements, aqueous species, gases, organic species, redox species, solid species, pressure and temperature ranges over which calculations can be made, an indication of the types of equations used for computing activity coefficients, numerical method used for calculating distribution of species and the total number of iterations required by these models for each of the two test cases. The chemical analyses for the two test cases are summarized in Table III. The seawater compilation was prepared in several units to assure consistency between concentrations for proper entry into the aqueous models.

The standard molecular structural parameters that one would like to control in block copolymer structures, especially in the context of polymeric nanostructures, are the relative size and nature of the blocks. The relative size implies the length of the block (or degree of polymerization, i.e., the number of monomer units contained within the block), while the nature of the block requires a slightly more elaborate description that includes its solubility characteristics, glass transition temperature (Tg), relative chain stiffness, etc. Using standard living polymerization methods, the size of the blocks is readily controlled by the ratio of the monomer concentration to that of the initiator. The relative sizes of the blocks can thus be easily fine-tuned very precisely to date the best control of these parameters in block copolymers is achieved using anionic polymerization. The nature of each block, on the other hand, is controlled by the selection of the monomer for instance, styrene would provide a relatively stiff (hard) block while isoprene would provide a soft one. This is a consequence of the very low Tg of polyisoprene compared to that of polystyrene, which in simplistic terms reflects the relative conformational stiffness of the polymer chain. 

The table shows an example using the 500 serum triglyceride concentrations displayed in Figure 16-3. See the text for a description of the nonparametric method. The unit of all concentrations in the table is imnol/L. 

---