Concentration space defined

A three-dimensional meshwork of proteinaceous filaments of various sizes fills the space between the organelles of all eukaryotic cell types. This material is known collectively as the cytoskeleton, but despite the static property implied by this name, the cytoskeleton is plastic and dynamic. Not only must the cytoplasm move and modify its shape when a cell changes its position or shape, but the cytoskeleton itself causes these movements. In addition to motility, the cytoskeleton plays a role in metabolism. Several glycolytic enzymes are known to be associated with actin filaments, possibly to concentrate substrate and enzymes locally. Many mRNA species appear to be bound by filaments, especially in egg cells where they may be immobilized in distinct regions thereby becoming concentrated in defined tissues upon subsequent cell divisions. 

In their fundamental paper on curve resolution of two-component systems, Lawton and Sylvestre [7] studied a data matrix of spectra recorded during the elution of two constituents. One can decide either to estimate the pure spectra (and derive from them the concentration profiles) or the pure elution profiles (and derive from them the spectra) by factor analysis. Curve resolution, as developed by Lawton and Sylvestre, is based on the evaluation of the scores in the PC-space. Because the scores of the spectra in the PC-space defined by the wavelengths have a clearer structure (e.g. a line or a curve) than the scores of the elution profiles in the PC-space defined by the elution times, curve resolution usually estimates pure spectra. Thereafter, the pure elution profiles are estimated from the estimated pure spectra. Because no information on the specific order of the spectra is used, curve resolution is also applicable when the sequence of the spectra is not in a specific order. 

When the steady state becomes unstable, the system moves away from it and often undergoes sustained oscillations around the unstable steady state. In the phase space defined by the system s variables, sustained oscillations generally correspond to the evolution toward a limit cycle (Fig. 1). Evolution toward a limit cycle is not the only possible behavior when a steady state becomes unstable in a spatially homogeneous system. The system may evolve toward another stable steady state— when such a state exists. The most common case of multiple steady states, referred to as bistability, is of two stable steady states separated by an unstable one. This phenomenon is thought to play a role in differentiation [30]. When spatial inhomogeneities develop, instabilities may lead to the emergence of spatial or spatiotemporal dissipative stmctures [15]. These can take the form of propagating concentration waves, which are closely related to oscillations. 

Let us assume that the auxiliary dynamical system is acyclic and has only one attractor, a fixed point. This means that stoichiometric vectors form a basis in a subspace of concentration space with — 0. For every reaction A,- A the following linear operators Qu can be defined ... 

If a flux vector J is thermodynamically feasible, then there exist concentrations Ci that satisfy the above inequality. In fact, Equation (9.27) defines a feasible space for the metabolites concentrations as a convex cone in the log-concentration space. 

Structure within a compositional data set is the differential occurrence of data points in the n-space defined by elemental concentrations. One simple kind of structure consists of points grouped around two centroids, or centers of mass, in the elemental concentration space. Structure within a compositional data set is assumed, implicitly or explicitly, to reflect the underlying process responsible for the data. Thus, in the case of the two-centroid structure just mentioned, an underlying process, such as procurement of clay from two sources, is assumed. 

Iv) Cross-differentiation also yields Esin-Markov coefficients p. Introduced in sec. I.5.6d. These coefficients contain information on the relative contributions of the cations and anions to the countercharge, l.e. they help to obtain the composition of the double layer. Experimentally, is measured as the horizontal spacing between ff°(pAg) or salt concentrations and defined as... 

This generalized gradient is based on a Riemannian metric defined on the interior of the concentration space x > 0 X x = 1, fc = 1,. . . , n, which replaces the conventional Euclidean metric. We compare the definitions of the two inner products ... 

We construct the attainable region by noting that the concentration space is a vector field with a rate vector (e.g., in Fig. 1, dC /dC/ = RB/R ) defined at each point. Moreover, we are not restricted to concentration space, but can consider any other variable that satisfies a linear conservation law (e.g., mass fractions, residence time, energy, and temperature—for constant heat capacity and density). The attainable region is an especially powerful concept once it is known, performance of the network can often be determined without the network itself. 

Next, the least squares relationship is found between the scores vector T. and concentration vector C, defining the concentration space weight vector 14... 

On the other hand, if one proton is discharged in the space defined between the two radii R = 70 A and f D = 35 A, its formal concentration is only 1.2mM. There is an apparent tenfold discrepancy between the... 

In the subsequent steps the procedures to answer the two questions differ. In the first case, the assessment of a newly designed plant, usually the desired conversion, the optimal process temperature and the required production rate are fixed. Also the mode of operation, such as continuous or discontinuous, is predetermined by demands on selectivity and 3deld. The safety evaluation now has to assess, whether or not the parameter combination selected fi om the multi-dimensional space defined by reactor size, initial concentrations, characteristic reaction time as well as coolant and feed temperature can ensure safe operation under normal conditions. 

Hence, the amount of solvent Eq determines the position of the mixing point in the concentration space. The point Mj represents the overall concentration of the two phases. It has to lie within the two-phase region (miscibility gap). Points R and define the concentrations of the raffinate and the extract, respectively. Their amounts are determined via mass balances or, graphically, via lever rule. 

Whereas concentration space is open— its bounds are [0 c )— reactions on a given feed are necessarily bounded by mass balance. The AR must therefore be contained within a subset of concentrations in IR", and although the AR is often thought to exist as an infinite region in state space, it is in fact finite and well defined, as shown in Figure 3.13. 

Extents can take on negative values Extent of reaction is positive for products and negative for reactants. Concentrations, by comparison, may never take on negative values. This property provides a convenient set of bounds for all species present in a mixture. If concentration is used over extent for a given reactive system, the associated AR for the system must then also always lie in the positive orthant of concentration space." Additionally, using reaction stoichiometry and mass balance constraints, it is possible to compute a definite bound (called the stoichiometric subspace) that the AR must reside in. Similar bounds are rather less well-defined when extent is employed, and thus greater care must be taken. 

Note that the rate field is defined by the kinetics, irrespective of the particular reactor employed. Different reactor types will trace out different paths in concentration space according to the shape of the rate field. As will be shown, each type serves an important purpose in the formation of the AR. Let us begin with the simplest of continuous reactors, the PER. 

Much of the content in this chapter is taken from important contributions by Martin Feinberg (Feinberg, 1999, 2(X)0a, 2000b Feinberg and Hildebrandt, 1997). As will be shown, results from four papers by Feinberg, in particular, broadly define the major findings of AR theory in concentration space—at the time of writing, these results have yet to be expanded to wider state spaces, such as mass fraction space. It is for this reason that primary focus will be placed on AR constructions in concentration space alone wherein density is assumed constant. 

This expression describes the condition for a critical CSTR. Setting A(C) = 0 describes a surface in concentration space that a critical CSTR locus must intersect. This may be visualized by plotting A(C) = 0 along with the CSTR locus and seeing where points from both objects meet. Note that this surface is defined without the need for a feed point. Thus all critical CSTR loci, from any feed, must intersect this surface. 

Suppose that a system of reactions with associated kinetics is available, obeying a certain reaction stoichiometry. Since expressions for the rate of formation are known and available, it is possible to compute the AR for the system in concentration space. The particular region computed, defined by the kinetics for the system, will exist as a convex polytope residing in R . 

If the positions of the extreme points of S can be identified in extent space, then Equation 8.1 may be invoked to solve for the corresponding points in concentration space. Computing the extreme points of a convex polytope, defined by a set of hyperplane constraints, is termed vertex enumeration. 

We can hence calculate the extreme points of the region defined by Equation 8.2b in extent space by vertex enumeration. The set of extents forming the extreme points of the stoichiometric subspace is found to be [1.0, 0.0], [-0.25, 0.75]T, [0.0, 1.0]T, [0.0, 0.0]. From this set, equivalent extreme points in concentration space may be computed using Equation 8.1. The stoichiometric subspace resides as a two-dimensional subspace in IR . This subspace may be projected onto different component spaces for visualization. A number of example component pairs are shown in Figure 8.4(a). 

The system involves three independent reactions with four components. It follows that the AR is a three-dimensional subspace in Later on, it will be useM to provide a comparison of the AR generated in this chapter in mass fraction space, to that produced in Chapter 7 originally in concentration space. For this reason, the AR shall be generated in z -Zb-Zjj space. Components C may be found by mass balance. The mass fraction and rate vectors are then defined as z = [z, Zg, Zjj] and r(z) = [r (z), rg(z), rjj(z)] . It is assumed that the feed available is pure in component A. The feed molar flow rate vector is hence given as = [1, 0, 0]. Since the feed is pure in A, it follows that the mass fraction feed vector be given as Zj = [1,0,0]. ... 

In order to model the retention in a hybrid micellar mobile system, Strasters et al. [8] proposed a procedure that used the retention data of only five mobile phases four measurements at the comers of the selected two-dimensional variable space, defined by the concentrations of surfactant and modifier, and the fifth in the center (design VI in Fig. 8.4). In this method, the rectangular variable space is divided into four triangular subspaces defined by three of the five measurements two neighbor comer... 

---