Concentration, fixative penetration, rate

Mass-Transfer Coefficient Denoted by /c, K, and so on, the mass-transfer coefficient is the ratio of the flux to a concentration (or composition) difference. These coefficients generally represent rates of transfer that are much greater than those that occur by diffusion alone, as a result of convection or turbulence at the interface where mass transfer occurs. There exist several principles that relate that coefficient to the diffusivity and other fluid properties and to the intensity of motion and geometry. Examples that are outlined later are the film theoiy, the surface renewal theoiy, and the penetration the-oiy, all of which pertain to ideahzed cases. For many situations of practical interest like investigating the flow inside tubes and over flat surfaces as well as measuring external flowthrough banks of tubes, in fixed beds of particles, and the like, correlations have been developed that follow the same forms as the above theories. Examples of these are provided in the subsequent section on mass-transfer coefficient correlations. 

In this mode, a small SECM tip is used to penetrate a microstructure, for example, a submicrometer-thick polymer film containing fixed redox centers or loaded with a redox mediator, and extract spatially resolved information (i.e., a depth profile) about concentrations, kinetic- and mass-transport parameters [33, 34]. With a tip inside the film, relatively far from the underlying conductor or insulator, solid-state voltammetry, at the tip can be carried out similarly to conventional voltammetric experiments in solution. At smaller distances, the tip current either increases or decreases depending on the rate of the mediator regeneration at the substrate. If the film is homogeneous and not very resistive, the current-distance curves are similar to those obtained in solution. 

The movement of the rubbery-solvent interface, S, was governed by the difference between the solvent penetration flux and the dissolution rate, derived earlier. An implicit Crank-Nicholson technique with a fixed grid was used to solve the model equations. A typical concentration profile of the polymer is shown in Fig, 24. Typical Case II behavior was observed. The respective positions of the interfaces R and S are shown in Fig. 25. Typical disentanglement-controlled dissolution was observed. Limited comparisons of the model predictions were made with experimental data for a PMMA-MIBK system. 

The methanol molecule is smaller than carbon dioxide and penetrates most plant tissues quickly for rapid metabolism. As a plant source of carbon, methanol is a liquid concentrate 1 cc methanol provides the equivalent fixed-carbon substrate of over 2,000,000 cc of ambient air. Methanol absorbed by foliage is metabolized to carbon dioxide, amino acids, sugars, and other structural components. Two major paths of methanol metabolism are the internal production of carbon dioxide that is then utilized in photosynthesis and the incorporation of methanol as a fixed source of carbon. Briefly stated in field terms, methanol treatments are a means of placing carbon directly into the foliage. Hi li t intensity is necessary to drive photosynthesis at the rates necessary to process the high internal levels of carbon dioxide presented by methanol. Serine formation and carbon dioxide fixation by photosynthesis may lead to the production of su. Increases of su concentration in the presence of moisture lead to increased turgidity. 

---