Peptide complementary

Fig. 18 Peptide library used for studying complementary peptides. Reproduced from Takahashi et al. [57] with permission. Copyright Wiley-VCH...

Figure 14.7 (Left) Molecular model of several self-complementary peptides and (right) atomic force microscopy images of nanohber scaffolds formed by RADA16-I. Reprinted from Zhao and Zhang (2006). Copyright 2006 RSC Publishing.

Michnick, S. W. (2001). Exploring protein interactions by interaction-induced folding of proteins from complementary peptide fragments. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 11, 472-477. 

A range of functionalized and unfunctionalized self-assembling fibrous structures have been tested for their biocompatibility and ability to provide cells with a favorable micro- and nanoenvironments for soft tissue engineering. In this section, studies that focus on amyloid fibrils, on peptide amphi-philes, on ionic complementary peptides, and on dipeptide structures are reviewed. Hard tissue engineering, composites, and coating are also explored followed by macroscopic structures and networks that can be created from fibrous protein structures. 

Ionic complementary peptides have been extensively examined for biocompatibility in a series of short-term in vitro and in vivo assays. The majority, but not all, of these studies have focused on two model systems RAD16 and EAK16. 

The properties of peptide fibers formed by ionic complementary peptides may need some tailoring to meet the different requirements for scaffolds and materials for drug delivery. Flowever, these roles could be quite complementary. It is easy to envisage that mixtures of peptide fibers with different stabilities could be used to simultaneously stimulate and support the growth of soft tissues. 

Peptide mass fingerprinting (PMF) of tryptic digests of both the modified and the tmmodified protein (complementary peptide mapping). By careful comparison of the two spectra, m/z shifts can be found, from which the identity of the modification may be elucidated, as well as the tryptic fragment(s) that are actrrally modified. When the amino-acid sequence of the protein is known (and vahdated), the position of the modification may be known. For example. 

Conventional methods for the study of protein phosphorylation rely on radioactive labelling, 2D-GE protein mapping, and Edman degradation. Early studies in LC-MS characterization of protein phosphorylation involve MS-MS analysis of modified tryptic peptide to determine the phosphorylation site by complementary peptide mapping, e.g., [5-7]. In the LC-MS analysis of tryptic and V8-protease digests of a phosphorylated (ppl9) and nonphosphorylated (pl9) 19-kDa cytosolic protein, two sets of ions with a phosphate-characteristic mass difference of 80 Da were observed. Sequence analysis of the relevant peptides by MS-MS showed that phosphorylation occurs at Ser-25 and Ser-38 [7]. 

Other proteolytic enzymes commonly used in proteomics analysis include Lys-C, Lys-N, and chymotrypsin. In general, these enzymes differ by their specificity for cleaving the amide bond before or after a specific residue. For complex protein samples, a combination of highly selective proteases has proved to increase proteome coverage by creating complementary peptides (13). 

Figure 20.10. Amphiphilic ionic self-complementary peptides. This class of peptides has 16 amino acids, c. 5 nm in size, with an alternating polar and non-polar pattern. They form stable (3-strand and 3-sheet structures thus, the side chains partition into two sides, one polar and the other non-polar. They undergo self-assembly to form nanofibers with the non-polar residues inside positively and negatively charged residues form complementary ionic interactions, like a checkerboard. These nanofibers form interwoven matrices that further form a scaffold hydrogel with a very high water content ( 99.5%). The simplest peptide scaffold may form compartments to separate molecules into localized places where they can not only have high concentration, but also form a molecular gradient, one of the key prerequisites for prebiotic molecular evolution.

By definition, a sense peptide is one whose sequence is coded for by the nucleotide sequence (read 5 3 ) of sense mRNA, whose sequence contains the same coding information as the sense strand of DNA. Gonversely, a complementary peptide is coded for by the nucleotide sequence (read 5 3 ) of complementary mRNA, with the same sequence information as the complementary strand of DNA. Frequently, sense and complementary peptides are capable of specific interactions, in a process that may involve an amino-acid interaction code embedded within the genetic code and its complement (Figure 7.40). One application of sense-complementary peptide interactions may be in the design of complementary... 

Figure 7.41 Complementary peptide derivation (a) Three ribbon structure views of interleukin-1/3 (IL-1/3) X-ray structure (pdb lilb), showing (top side) key receptor binding residue regions (yellow) and the Boiaschi loop (red). Overlay structure involves superposition of Interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-lra) X-ray structure (pdb lilt) upon IL-1 8 (side view) to demonstrate the general structural similarity between these protein family member proteins, but also the absence of Boraschi loop in IL-lra. IL-lra is the only known natural inhibitor of IL-1 8. (b) mRNA sequence of Boraschi loop and decoded amino acid residue sequence (red) set alongside deduced mRNA sequence of complementary peptide and decoded amino acid residue sequence (blue), (c) Structure of complementary peptide corresponding with the Boraschi loop a potential complementary (antisense) peptide mini-receptor inhibitor of IL-1/3.

Altman, M., Lee, P., Rich, A., Zhang, S. Conformational behavior of ionic self-complementary peptides. Protein Sci. 9,1095-1105 (2000)... 

They used two complementary peptides in the study, which on self-assembly form sticky ends. Each peptide consists of N-terminal half (positively charged, basic), C-terminal half (negatively charged, acidic), and an asparagines residue, as depicted in Fig. 45.7. 

Ryadnov describes a coiled-coil design that self-assembles to form a polynanoreactor. The design consists of two complementary peptide supradendrimers (noncovalent pep-tidic dendrimers) designed to self-assemble and form a polynanoreactor with various sized cavities. Peptide supradendrimer 1 (SD-1) is designed around a homodimeric... 

---