Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Comparison of Deposition Techniques

Teichler A, Perelaer J, Schubert US (2013) Ink-jet printing of organic electronics - comparison of deposition techniques and state-of-the-art developments. J Mater Chem C Mater Opt Elect Dev 1(10) 1910-1925... [Pg.558]

Table III. It is obvious from the data in Table III that the housefly and the mosquito, in both the adult and larval stage, are susceptible to insecticides of the DDT type. However, the extravagant claims that DFDT is far superior to DDT as a contact insecticide against flies are not borne out by the results of controlled laboratory tests. The Peet-Grady testing technique used by Prill (92) would indicate that in the presence of added pyrethrins DDT is definitely superior to DFDT when applied as a spray. On the other hand, DFDT gave higher percentage kills than DDT when flies were placed under a Petri dish and held in contact with deposits of the compounds on glass surfaces. A comparison of the activity of these compounds against adult mosquitoes has not been reported. Table III. It is obvious from the data in Table III that the housefly and the mosquito, in both the adult and larval stage, are susceptible to insecticides of the DDT type. However, the extravagant claims that DFDT is far superior to DDT as a contact insecticide against flies are not borne out by the results of controlled laboratory tests. The Peet-Grady testing technique used by Prill (92) would indicate that in the presence of added pyrethrins DDT is definitely superior to DFDT when applied as a spray. On the other hand, DFDT gave higher percentage kills than DDT when flies were placed under a Petri dish and held in contact with deposits of the compounds on glass surfaces. A comparison of the activity of these compounds against adult mosquitoes has not been reported.
Very limited investigations have been conducted with this alloy system. The results obtained to date suggest that A1 co-deposits with Fe from solutions of Fe(II) in both AlCl3-EtMeImCl at 25 °C [46] and AlCl3-NaCl at 160 °C [100]. In both studies, the A1 co-deposition process was found to commence at nearly the same potential as the Fe(II) reduction reaction therefore, it was difficult to observe a well-defined voltammetric limiting current for the latter process, regardless of the technique that was employed. This behavior is nearly identical to that seen in the Ni-Al system [47], However, a comparison of the voltammetric results recorded for some of the other... [Pg.305]

A standard technique for the comparison of XPS results on bare gold clusters supported on substrates [74,75] is to relate surface coverage during deposition to average diameter of the particles formed by surface diffusion after deposition. [Pg.31]

Vandenberg, J. J., and K. R. Knoerr, Comparison of Surrogate Surface Techniques for Estimation of Sulfate Dry Deposition, Atmos. Environ., 19, 627-635 (f985). [Pg.41]

S. Newman, K. Steed, G. Hooper, A. Kallen, and L. Borgstrom, Comparison of gamma scintigraphy and a pharmacokinetic technique for assessing pulmonary deposition of terbutaline sulphate delivered by pressurized metered dose inhaler, Pharm. Res. 72 231 (1995). [Pg.86]

Jervis RE, Landsberger S, Aufreiter S, et al. 1983. Trace elements in wet atmospheric deposition Application and comparison of PIXE, INAA, and graphite-furnace AAS techniques. Int J Environ Anal Chem 15 89-106. [Pg.429]

We have employed two multi-elemental techniques (INAA and ICP-AES) to determine sulphur, halogens and 14 other trace elements in urban summer rainfall. Quality control was assured using NBS reference materials. The overall accuracy and precision of these two methods makes possible the routine analysis of many environmentally important trace elements in acid rain related investigations. Enrichment factor calculations showed that several elements including S, Cu, Zn and Cr were abnormally enriched in the urban atmosphere. A comparison of three separate sites showed a strong gradient of metal deposition from the industrial to the outlaying areas. [Pg.212]


See other pages where Comparison of Deposition Techniques is mentioned: [Pg.1]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.1]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.330]    [Pg.445]    [Pg.514]    [Pg.408]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.533]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.398]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.410]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.218]    [Pg.818]    [Pg.247]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.475]    [Pg.383]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.471]    [Pg.429]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.356]    [Pg.331]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.468]    [Pg.423]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.645]    [Pg.382]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.113]   


SEARCH



Comparison of techniques

Comparison techniques

© 2024 chempedia.info