Column stability testing

Columns for a particular laboratory can be chosen based on some set of internal criteria. One of the criteria to select a column should be such that the column is stable for a certain number of column volumes (efficiency, tailing factor, and retention time criteria for predefined probe analytes) at the recommended maximum and minimum pH at a particular maximum temperature. This would allow the chromatographer to employ such phases with a significant degree of confidence and ensure the robustness of the stationary phase during method development and for release and stability testing. 

---

Determination of column stability test the column stability by applying a known amount of analyte perform sample loading, column wash, analyte elution, column regeneration, and storage cycle steps for multiple analyses. Initially we test the columns reusability daily for a week, then weekly for a month, then monthly for up to 3 mo. 

Hot column stability testing is done by placing the test substrate with resistors on a hot stage at 400°C for 5 min, with a subsequent quench to room temperature. The shift in resistance values is then recorded. Stable resistors experience minimum change from this test. Stability of resistors after thermal shock is shown in Fig. 8.64. The stability of resistors can also be tested by subjecting them to a thermal cycle test which consists of 5 cycles of 5 min at-65°C, transfer within 10 s to-l-150°C, and a dwell of 5 min before transfer back to -65°C. The stability of commercial thick film resistors is considered acceptable if changes in resistance of less than +0.2 percent result from this test. 

Accelerated stability tests using the emulsion volume index (EVI) Accelerated aging procedure in which an emulsion in a microhematocrit tube is subjected to centrifugal force EVI = (length of emulsion phase/lolul length of column) (% fal/0.9) x 100. A higher EVI indicates a more stable emulsion under the conditions of the test. 

The results of such tests are most useful for determining differences in stability among columns from various manufacturers (ie., they are good relative tests). However, these tests should not be considered absolute measures of column stability since their relationship to real-life use conditions is not known. 

A column performance test is used to ensure the proper condition of columns and the stability of retention parameters. Because CWC-related chemicals greatly differ both chemically and physically from each other, the test chemicals have been selected so that their physical, chemical, and retention properties are different, and so that they elute evenly over the whole chromatogram. The use of the following chemicals in a column performance test is recommended trimethylphosphate, 2,6-dimethylphenol, 5-chloro-2-methylaniline, tri-n-butylphosphate, dibenzothiophene, malathion, and methyl stearate. The concentration of test chemicals depends on the sensitivity of detectors. The... 

The antifoams were studied on a foam from 1% commercial sulphonol solution. The rate of foam breakdown, caused by the antifoam sprayed, is determined by the foam volume destroyed for 1 min and by the lifetime of one half of the foam column. As tests showed the change in the content of the foaming composition affects the activity of the antifoaming agent but the relative foam stability almost does not change. 

Some degradation products are either very polar or very nonpolar in nature this may present an issue in chromatography, where they may not be retained or strongly adsorbed on the column, respectively. One may also want to double check the reference standard for its purity, moisture content, and/or salt/ acid-base ratio for calculation. An analytical chemist must remember to explore all possibilities if mass balance issue is observed (either during method development, validation and/or stability testing). 

This paper evaluates the effect of the fixed waste s alkalinity on the release patterns of heavy metals from the solidified waste. Both batch and upflow column leaching tests were used to study this effect. The results of this research indicate that the leaching rate of heavy metals from stabilized/solidified wastes is governed by the amount of alkalinity present in the waste. Appreciable metal leaching will not occur untQ enough of the buffering capacity of the waste has been neutralized so that the pH of the leachant drops to 6.0 or less. Consequently, the U.S. EPA test, which limits the amount of leachant acid used, is not valid for the evaluation of these types of waste. 

T. M. Brown, Column Leach Testing of Heavy Metal Sludges Stabilized/Solidified with Portland Cement An Investigation of Release Meehanisms, M. S. Thesis, Univ. of New Hampshire, Durham, NH (1984). 

Fig. 7 Chromatograms of a mixture of acetone (1), benzonitrile (2), benzene (3), toluene (4), and naphthalene (5), obtained from a zirconized silica column with a radiation-immobilized PMOS coating (a) before initiating the stability test and (b) after completing the stability test with 5000 column volumes each of neutral and alkaline (pH 10) mobile phases. (From Ref. [8].)...

Following the establishment of specificity, the method(s) should be validated to allow for use in release and stability testing. Such validation is typically less stringent than for final methods (sec Chapter 12), but should demonstrate specificity, linearity, range, accuracy, and analysis repeatability for the API. For related substances, specificity should be demonstrated and the limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantitation (LOQ) should be established for the API to serve as surrogate values for the LOD and LOQ of impurities for which authentic substances are not available. To achieve a sufficient LOD and simultaneously keep the API in the linear dynamic range of the detector, it may be necessary to use different sample concentrations for the analyses of the API and related substances. It is additionally beneficial to repeat the separation on new columns from different batches to ascertain that the separation obtained can be maintained column to column. 

All phases of analytical development are ideally supported by chemical separation techniques such as HPLC, TLC, GC, SFC, and CE. HPLC continues to be the primary method of analysis throughout the pharmaceutical development process. Although HPLC is limited in its ability to separate more than 15-20 components in a single analysis, and variations in columns and instrumentation manufacturer to manufacturer complicate transfer of methods, HPLC can readily be implemented to meet ICH requirements for method performance. For early-phase methods, HPLC can be coupled dynamically to mass and nuclear magnetic resonance spectrometers to facilitate the identification of unknown impurities. In later phases, HPLC can be implemented in a fully automated format as a high-throughput method for release and stability testing. 

Figure 4.43. (a) Automated FIA manifold used for the determination of nitrate by reduction to nitrite with spectrophometric detection (cf. Fig. 4.5). The sample (30 p.L), aspirated from the sample changer 5, is injected into a 0.25 M acetate solution of pH 6.0 (A) and then carried to the reduction column, which is filled with small zinc chips. The nitrite produced is then mixed with the color-forming reagent solution R. (b) Long-term stability test of the nitrate reduction column used in the system shown in (a). A series of samples (1.0-10 ppm N-NO3), each injected in triplicate, were placed in the sample changer and the system was operated continuously for 6 h every day over a period of 3 days (sampling rate 180 samples/ h). Not until the third day did the column show signs of gradually reduced efficiency.

Because the oxidizable group in atropine is a tertiary nitrogen atom (pKa 9.8), the response increased as the pH of the mobile phase was increased. A buffer of pH 7.2 was chosen, as it offered a high response and ensured column stability. Atropine and scopolamine were separated on a hydrophilic-diol column. Reversed-phase columns were also tested, but gave long retention times. However, scopolamine was not completely resolved from the early eluting interferences on the diol column and only atropine was quantitated. 

---