Cohesive chemical potential

Cohesive chemical potential, or cohesive self-energy, ficoh is defined as the free energy of an individual gas or liquid molecule surrounded by the same molecules. This is not an intermolecular pair potential term itself, however it may be calculated from pair potentials by summing this molecule s interactions with all the surrounding molecules. Since we know that the intermolecular forces are not to extend over large distances but only interact with molecules in close proximity for gases, then, similar to the derivation of Equations (19) and (20), the pair potential for a molecule in the gas phase is given as... 

By taking the derivative of the cohesive chemical potential of the gas with its number density at constant temperature, we have... 

FIG. 12 Schematic representation of the iterative scheme. We have two nested iterative loops the time loop (1) for updating the density fields p, and within each time iteration an iterative loop (2) for updating the external potential fields U. We start with an initial guess for the external potential fields. We use Eq. (17) to generate a set of unique density fields. The cohesive chemical potential E [relation (3)] can be calculated from the density fields by Eq. (8). The total chemical potential /x(4) can now be found from Eq. 6. We update the density fields (5) [by using the old and updated fields in Eq. (23)] and accept the density fields if the condition (26) is satisfied. If this is not the case, the external potential fields are updated by a steepest descent method. 

Ultimately, the surface energy is used to produce a cohesive body during sintering. As such, surface energy, which is also referred to as surface tension, y, is obviously very important in ceramic powder processing. Surface tension causes liquids to fonn spherical drops, and allows solids to preferentially adsorb atoms to lower tire free energy of tire system. Also, surface tension creates pressure differences and chemical potential differences across curved surfaces tlrat cause matter to move. 

Well-defined products from the chaotic turmoil, which is a chemical reaction, result from a balance between external thermodynamic factors and the internal molecular parameters of chemical potential, electron density and angular momentum. Each of the molecular products, finally separated from the reaction mixture, is a new equilibrium system that balances these internal factors. The composition depends on the chemical potential, the connectivity is determined by electron-density distribution and the shape depends on the alignment of vectors that quenches the orbital angular momentum. The chemical, or quantum, potential at an equilibrium level over the entire molecule, is a measure of the electronegativity of the molecule. This is the parameter that contributes to the activation barrier, should this molecule engage in further chemical activity. Molecular cohesion is a holistic function of the molecular quantum potential that involves all sub-molecular constituents on an equal basis. The practically useful concept of a chemical bond is undefined in such a holistic molecule. 

It could be argued, of course, that the differences and similarities cited above stem from the fact that solvent extraction is essentially a steady-state (equilibrium) process while electrophoresis and sedimentation are transient (rate) processes. However, such an argument would overlook the fact (to be explained later) that the different forms of the chemical potential profile determine which systems can be run successfully in the steady-state mode and which in the transient mode. Thus the chemical potential profile and associated flow structure emerge as dominant influences that should be classified at the very beginning of any attempt to organize separation phenomena into a cohesive discipline. 

Now, we consider the stability of a surface phase as a function of chemical potential. In writing the expression for the DFT approximation of surface stability. Equation (6.15), the formation energy was approximated as There are many circumstances in which a representation of the cohesive energy of a structure, is an insufficient representation of free energy the most common cases in which fails to represent the free energy well... 

This quantity is perhaps not appropriately called a chemical potential, but it has the character of chemical potential as being developed here, where the corresponding material volume is the amount of crack surface area. The equilibrium condition X = 0 corresponds to the Griffith crack growth criterion introduced in Section 4.2.1. These ideas are applied in a discussion of cohesive contact in Section 8.6. 

The liquid-liquid interface is not only a boundary plane dividing two immiscible liquid phases, but also a nanoscaled, very thin liquid layer where properties such as cohesive energy, density, electrical potential, dielectric constant, and viscosity are drastically changed along with the axis from one phase to another. The interfacial region was anticipated to cause various specific chemical phenomena not found in bulk liquid phases. The chemical reactions at liquid-liquid interfaces have traditionally been less understood than those at liquid-solid or gas-liquid interfaces, much less than the bulk phases. These circumstances were mainly due to the lack of experimental methods which could measure the amount of adsorbed chemical species and the rate of chemical reaction at the interface [1,2]. Several experimental methods have recently been invented in the field of solvent extraction [3], which have made a significant breakthrough in the study of interfacial reactions. 

The liquid-liquid interface formed between two immissible liquids is an extremely thin mixed-liquid state with about one nanometer thickness, in which the properties such as cohesive energy density, electrical potential, dielectric constant, and viscosity are drastically changing from those of bulk phases. Solute molecules adsorbed at the interface can behave like a 2D gas, liquid, or solid depending on the interfacial pressure, or interfacial concentration. But microscopically, the interfacial molecules exhibit local inhomogeneity. Therefore, various specific chemical phenomena, which are rarely observed in bulk liquid phases, can be observed at liquid-liquid interfaces [1-3]. However, the nature of the liquid-liquid interface and its chemical function are still less understood. These situations are mainly due to the lack of experimental methods required for the determination of the chemical species adsorbed at the interface and for the measurement of chemical reaction rates at the interface [4,5]. Recently, some new methods were invented in our laboratory [6], which brought a breakthrough in the study of interfacial reactions. 

---