Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Coherent photon-echo techniques

Fluorescence line-narrowing and coherent photon-echo techniques (Macfarlane 1992) could give some idea about the homogeneous part of an emission line, but the statistical analysis for the whole sample should still be performed. Supposing only a sensitizer-activator interaction, an average transfer efficiency can be calculated (Dexter 1953). This was studied in some detail by Inokuti and Hirayama (1965). They considered the number of activators located at random in a sphere around a sensitizer in such a way that the activator concentration remains constant when the volume of the sphere and the number... [Pg.553]

Spontaneously Detected Photon Echoes in Excited Molecular Ensembles A Probe Pulse Laser Technique for the Detection of Optical Coherence of Inhomogeneously Broadened Electronic Transitions, A. H. Zewail, T. E. Orlowski, K. E. Jones, and D. E. Godar, Chem. Phys. Lett. 4S, 256 (1977). [Pg.42]

In 1964, the spin echo experiment was extended to the optical regime by the development of the photon echo experiment (3,4). The photon echo began the application of coherent pulse techniques in the visible and ultraviolet portions of the electromagnetic spectrum. Since its development, the photon echo and related pulse sequences have been applied to a wide variety of problems including dynamics and intermolecular interactions in crystals, glasses, proteins, and liquids (5-8). Like the spin echo, the photon echo and other optical coherent pulse sequences provide information that is not available from absorption or fluorescence spectroscopies. [Pg.240]

Either two or more molecular levels of a molecule are excited coherently by a spectrally broad, short laser pulse (level-crossing and quantum-beat spectroscopy) or a whole ensemble of many atoms or molecules is coherently excited simultaneously into identical levels (photon-echo spectroscopy). This coherent excitation alters the spatial distribution or the time dependence of the total, emitted, or absorbed radiation amplitude, when compared with incoherent excitation. Whereas methods of incoherent spectroscopy measure only the total intensity, which is proportional to the population density and therefore to the square ir of the wave function iff, the coherent techniques, on the other hand, yield additional information on the amplitudes and phases of ir. [Pg.369]

Within the density-matrix formalism (Vol. 1, Sect. 2.9) the coherent techniques measure the off-diagonal elements pab of the density matrix, called the coherences, while incoherent spectroscopy only yields information about the diagonal elements, representing the time-dependent population densities. The off-diagonal elements describe the atomic dipoles induced by the radiation field, which oscillate at the field frequency radiation sources with the field amplitude Ak(r, t). Under coherent excitation the dipoles oscillate with definite phase relations, and the phase-sensitive superposition of the radiation amplitudes Ak results in measurable interference phenomena (quantum beats, photon echoes, free induction decay, etc.). [Pg.369]

Besides various detection mechanisms (e.g. stimulated emission or ionization), there exist moreover numerous possible detection schemes. For example, we may either directly detect the emitted polarization (oc PP, so-called homodyne detection), thus measuring the decay of the electronic coherence via the photon-echo effect, or we may employ a heterodyne detection scheme (oc EP ), thus monitoring the time evolution of the electronic populations In the ground and excited electronic states via resonance Raman and stimulated emission processes. Furthermore, one may use polarization-sensitive detection techniques (transient birefringence and dichroism spectroscopy ), employ frequency-integrated (see, e.g. Ref. 53) or dispersed (see, e.g. Ref. 54) detection of the emission, and use laser fields with definite phase relation. On top of that, there are modern coherent multi-pulse techniques, which combine several of the above mentioned options. For example, phase-locked heterodyne-detected four-pulse photon-echo experiments make it possible to monitor all three time evolutions inherent to the third-order polarization, namely, the electronic coherence decay induced by the pump field, the djmamics of the system occurring after the preparation by the pump, and the electronic coherence decay induced by the probe field. For a theoretical survey of the various spectroscopic detection schemes, see Ref. 10. [Pg.744]

Many experimental variations of these coherent techniques have been developed but basically the experiments may be divided into two classifications, i.e. coherent transient technique and photon echo phenomena, the former requires high resolution, high stability sources while the latter relies on sequential pulse excitation with controlled delays. [Pg.446]


See other pages where Coherent photon-echo techniques is mentioned: [Pg.12]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.1968]    [Pg.331]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.294]    [Pg.341]    [Pg.449]    [Pg.516]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.423]    [Pg.472]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.331]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.448]    [Pg.449]    [Pg.468]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.448]    [Pg.448]    [Pg.1153]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.592]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.553 ]




SEARCH



Coherent technique

ECHO technique

Photon echoe

Photon techniques

Photon-echo

Photon-echo techniques

Photonics techniques

© 2024 chempedia.info