Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Coarse coefficients

Each additional resolution — up to the highest resolution level J—decomposes the coarse coefficients and leaves the detail coefficients unchanged. The remaining coarse coefficient cannot be decomposed further it consists of just four components. J is determined by the size n of the original vector with J = log2(n) - 2. Consequently, a wavelet-transformed descriptor can be represented by either single-level (j = 1) or multilevel (/< = /) decomposition. [Pg.100]

FIGURE 4.9 Schematic image of wavelet decomposition. The QMFs H and G are applied iteratively to each coarse coefficient set. The raw signal CW down sampled, leading to sets of coarse (C) and detail (D) coefficients of half the size. [Pg.102]

Combining coarse- and detail-filtered complete decomposition results in a combination of the coarse coefficients of the last resolution level and all the detail coefficients D - ... [Pg.148]

Figure 5.21 displays the combination of the coarse and the detail coefficients filtered up to the highest possible resolution level (/ = 6 with 256 components in the original RDF descriptor). In this case, the final (and only) coarse coefficient... [Pg.148]

The following variables can affect wall friction values of a bulk soHd. (/) Pressure as the pressure acting normal to the wall increases, the coefficient of sliding friction often decreases. (2) Moisture content as moisture increases, many bulk soHds become more frictional. (3) Particle size and shape typically, fine materials are somewhat more frictional than coarse materials. Angular particles tend to dig into a wall surface, thereby creating more friction. (4) Temperature for many materials, higher temperatures cause particles to become more frictional. (5) Time of storage at rest if allowed to remain in contact with a wall surface, many soHds experience an increase in friction between the particles and the wall surface. (6) Wall surface smoother wall surfaces are typically less frictional. Corrosion of the surface obviously can affect the abiUty of the material to sHde on it. [Pg.554]

This is not surprising since at a given speed the coarseness of a track (the average spacing of the asperities) influences the friction only on a logarithmic scale. Also the observed dependence of the friction coefficient on load of soft mbber compounds on smooth surfaces disappears for harder black or silica-filled treads compounds on rough surfaces. [Pg.758]

The multiscale basis functions capture the fast changes in coefficients corresponding to the fine-scale basis functions, while the slower changes are captured by the coarse-scale basis functions. Thus, the wavelet thresholding method adapts its resolution to the nature of the signal features and reduces the contribution of errors with minimum distortion of the features retained in the rectified signal. [Pg.22]

Although the relationship in Fig. 5.6 is somewhat coarse, it is still useful in predictions. Since octanol-water log P prediction programs are omnipresent and adequately reliable, it can now be said that they can predict membrane-water partitioning, by using the equation in Fig. 5.6. Better yet, if one measures the value of loS Ka. one can estimate the membrane partition coefficient with the confidence of the variance expressed in Fig. 5.6. [Pg.79]

This result can also be applied directly to coarse particle swarms. For fine particle systems, the suspending fluid properties are assumed to be modified by the fines in suspension, which necessitates modifying the fluid properties in the definitions of the Reynolds and Archimedes numbers accordingly. Furthermore, because the particle drag is a direct function of the local relative velocity between the fluid and the solid (the interstitial relative velocity, Fr), it is this velocity that must be used in the drag equations (e.g., the modified Dallavalle equation). Since Vr = Vs/(1 — Reynolds number and drag coefficient for the suspension (e.g., the particle swarm ) are (after Barnea and Mizrahi, 1973) ... [Pg.429]

Here A(r — r ) is the Onsager coefficient that specifies the transport properties of the considered system at a certain timescale and lengthscale, and which is nonlocal in general. The local chemical potential difference p(r) can be found in a standard way as a functional derivative of the coarse-grained free energy functional F [<()] ... [Pg.178]

When considering the impact of uptake by aerosol, the chemical composition of the aerosol is also likely to be significant. Bates et al. (1998, 2001) measured strong variations in the chemical composition of the Aitken, accommodation and sea-salt dominated coarse modes that would influence the free radical uptake rates, particularly the extent of aerosol acidification. Without data on the size segregated aerosol chemical composition during SOAPEX-2 and the relevant laboratory data, it is not possible to calculate accurate accommodation coefficients. [Pg.9]

Generally, it is clear how Kd can be predicted for organic hydrophobic pollutants which obey a linear isotherm relationship. First, the organic carbon partition coefficient (i. e.,K0C) is predicted based on either solubility or the octanol-water partition coefficient (K0Vf). Then based on an estimate of the organic carbon fraction in the fine and coarse sediments/soils, Kd can be estimated from Eqs. (a and b) (Table 1). [Pg.176]

Within an integral-driven procedure it seems natural to perform the parallelizing decomposition according to the pqrs summation in Eq. (2). This must lead to a relatively coarse-grain parallelization, because the important computational effort associated with identification of I-J pairs and evaluation of the corresponding coupling coefficients, then becomes distributed among all... [Pg.270]

Figure 9.9. Characterization of the bubble mass transfer coefficients for Tank tests. Coarse bubble (CB) j6i = 1/36, and fine bubble (FB) = 1/6. The 95% confidence interval is included (Cl) (Schierholz et al. 2006). Figure 9.9. Characterization of the bubble mass transfer coefficients for Tank tests. Coarse bubble (CB) j6i = 1/36, and fine bubble (FB) = 1/6. The 95% confidence interval is included (Cl) (Schierholz et al. 2006).
Figure 9.10. Characterization of the surface mass transfer coefficients for the tank tests. The 95% confidence interval is included (Shierholz et al., 2006). CB, coarse bubble FB, fine bubble LACSD, Los Angeles County Sanitary District WES, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station. Figure 9.10. Characterization of the surface mass transfer coefficients for the tank tests. The 95% confidence interval is included (Shierholz et al., 2006). CB, coarse bubble FB, fine bubble LACSD, Los Angeles County Sanitary District WES, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station.
The most appropriate models for CYC is probably equation (14) as this is the simplest and is most closely related to the results of the factor analysis which indicated that the variances in CYC were most closely related to those in V and PB. The inclusion of coarse particle manganese as a soil tracer diminished the significance of the coefficient of PB and the contribution of automotive sources. Ideally, MN would be used as a tracer for resuspended soil but Interferences from the use of MMT as a fuel additive during part of the period in which this data were collected make this a mixed source tracer for the contributions of automobiles and soil resuspension. [Pg.213]

Data on urban soil from the Portland Aerosol Study (21) were used to obtain an order of magnitude comparison of source ratios to the coefficients of MN(C) in the models. If volatile carbon (21) is assumed to be approximately equal to extractable organic matter (this study) and using a 1 1 ratio for coarse to fine particle mass in New York City (based on our unpublished data), then a ratio of extractable organic matter to MN(C) of 118 can be estimated for urban soil. The coefficients for MN(C) in the models were 46 11 [equation (16)] and 70 26 [equation (19)] for CYC and ACE, respectively. This is quite reasonable agreement in view of the approximations made to obtain a ratio for the soil source. [Pg.217]

For the coarse particles at any site, the correlation coefficient between any pair is typically greater than 0.90. The composition of this airborne soil is reasonably close to those of standard soil types. This is shown in Table I, which lists ratios to iron. [Pg.272]

In order to consolidate the separate concentrations of soil elements, a soils concentration was calculated by summing the elemental concentrations plus their presumed oxide concentration. These oxide forms are Al203,Si02,K20,Ca0,Ti02, and Fe203. For the coarse particles, this soils concentration accounted for 60% of the coarse gravimetric mass, with a correlation coefficient between the two of 0.90. For the fine particles, soils accounted for only 25% of the fine gravimetric mass, and the two were poorly correlated. [Pg.273]

Figure 15.8 Thermal conductivity bridge electronic circuit. 12 V dc power supply, stable to 1 mV. Ripple is not significant due to thermal lag of the filaments. Pj, 100 ohms for filament current control Mj, milliamp meter, 0-250 mA P2, 2 ohms for coarse zero. Filaments 1 and 4 are detector 1 2 and 3 are detector 2. P3,1 ohm for fine zero Ri j, R12, padding resistors 64 ohms Rj-Rio, attenuator resistors 1, 2, 4. .. 512 ohms Si (DPDT) switch for polarity. Attenuator resistors are 0.25 %w/w, lowest temperature coefficient all others are 1 %. Figure 15.8 Thermal conductivity bridge electronic circuit. 12 V dc power supply, stable to 1 mV. Ripple is not significant due to thermal lag of the filaments. Pj, 100 ohms for filament current control Mj, milliamp meter, 0-250 mA P2, 2 ohms for coarse zero. Filaments 1 and 4 are detector 1 2 and 3 are detector 2. P3,1 ohm for fine zero Ri j, R12, padding resistors 64 ohms Rj-Rio, attenuator resistors 1, 2, 4. .. 512 ohms Si (DPDT) switch for polarity. Attenuator resistors are 0.25 %w/w, lowest temperature coefficient all others are 1 %.
Figure 4. Comparison of coefficient of permeability as a function of air-voids content in sand-asphalt-sulfur and asphaltic concrete mixes (15,). Sand-asphalt-sulfur mixes were prepared with medium-coarse sand and 150/180 pen. asphalt. Key --------------, sand-asphalt-sulfur mixes andXKW. asphalt concrete. Figure 4. Comparison of coefficient of permeability as a function of air-voids content in sand-asphalt-sulfur and asphaltic concrete mixes (15,). Sand-asphalt-sulfur mixes were prepared with medium-coarse sand and 150/180 pen. asphalt. Key --------------, sand-asphalt-sulfur mixes andXKW. asphalt concrete.

See other pages where Coarse coefficients is mentioned: [Pg.100]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.1055]    [Pg.510]    [Pg.1586]    [Pg.396]    [Pg.358]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.718]    [Pg.557]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.740]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.417]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.370]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.100 , Pg.102 , Pg.148 ]




SEARCH



Coarse

Coarseness

© 2024 chempedia.info