Classification of materials

Bar chart of room-temperature density values for various metals, ceramics, polymers, and composite materials. 

Tungsten Iron/Steel Titanium Aluminum Magnesium 

Bar chart of room-temperature resistance to fracture (i.e., fracture toughness) for various metals, ceramics, polymers, and composite materials. (Reprinted from Engineering Materials 1 An Introduction to Properties, Applications and Design, third edition, M. F. Ashby and D. R. H. Jones, pages 177 and 178, Copyright 2005, with permission from Elsevier.) 

---

The basis of all bulk conveyor engineering is the precise definition and accurate classification of materials according to individual characteristics under a specific combination of handling conditions (1). Since the late 1960s there has been an extraordinary growth in research into the fundamental properties and behavior of particulate soHds. However, as of this writing, it is not possible to predict the handling behavior of a bulk soHds material relevant to conditions in a specific conveyor, merely on the basis of the discrete particle properties. 

Conveyor-Belt Devices The metal-belt type (Fig. 11. 55) is the only device in this classification of material-haudhug equipment that has had serious effort expended on it to adapt it to indirecl heat-transfer seiwice with divided solids. It features a lightweight construction of a large area with a thin metal wall. ludirect-coohiig applications have been made with poor thermal performance, as could be expected with a static layer. Auxihaiy plowlike mixing devices, which are considered an absolute necessity to secure any worthwhile results for this seiwice, restrict applications. 

Table 12-6 gives an approximate classification of materials that obey Eqs. (12-34) and (12-36). 

Originally the classification of materials was derived from tests of proprietary explosion-proof (flameproof) enclosures. There were no published criteria. Equipment was approved relative to the lowest ignition temperature of any material in the group (Magison 1987). In about 1965 the U.S. Coast Guard asked the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) to form a panel to classify 200 materials of commerce. The Electrical Hazards Panel of the Committee on Hazardous Materials was formed by the NAS. The Panel studied many ways to estimate the hazard classification of materials. The Panel finally reported to die U.S. Coast Guard in 1970 that no workable, predicdve scheme could be defined, and it then proceeded to assign tentative classifications to the 200 materials. 

Fig. 9-2 A general plastic cost comparison, based on volume, for a general classification of materials.

This classification of material behavior is summarized in Table 3-1 (in which the subscripts have been omitted for simplicity). Since we are concerned with fluids, we will concentrate primarily on the flow behavior of Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluids. However, we will also illustrate some of the unique characteristics of viscoelastic fluids, such as the ability of solutions of certain high polymers to flow through pipes in turbulent flow with much less energy expenditure than the solvent alone. 

Table 3.1 Classifications of Materials Present in Seawater and Approximate Concentration Ranges. ...

The first three sections of this chapter have described the three traditional primary classifications of materials metals, ceramics, and polymers. There is an increasing... 

There are rules governing classification of materials that contain a percentage of hazardous materials. These are given in the criteria for determining hazardous materials and are a function of the degree of hazardousness and the concentration of the ingredient. In the case in which there are several different hazardous materials, the various factors are summed up and a total degree established. These factors are also used to determine what risk and safety phases are applicable to the particular material. 

In this scheme, the primary reference material is defined as a chemical substance of the highest (and known) purity, or a well-characterized substance in a matrix, This classification of materials is, however, fairly arbitrary. It is ideal when used in connection with standards characterized in terms of biological activity. Primary standards are thus the International Reference Preparations (IRP) produced by the World Health Organization (WHO). In this case the primary standard for a particular antibiotic is the WHO reference preparation which constitutes the unit of that antibiotic. When people wish to use it they have to prepare a large batch of samples calibrated to the primary. This is then called a secondary standard. However, for well-defined chemical parameters, the term certified reference material is preferred. 

Fig. 1. Scheme for classification of materials prepared from a donor or donor cation, D+p, and acceptor or acceptor cation, A-q, (p, q = 0,1,. ..) with one or both components being a planar transition-metal complex... 

Figure 4.3 Classification of materials on the Periodic Table of the Elements...

The chemist is accustomed to think of the chemical bond from the valence-bond approach of Pauling (7)05), for this approach enables construction of simple models with which to develop a chemical intuition for a variety of complex materials. However, this approach is necessarily qualitative in character so that at best it can serve only as a useful device for the correlation and classification of materials. Therefore the theoretical context for the present discussion is the Hund (290)-Mulliken (4f>7) molecular-orbital approach. Nevertheless an important restriction to the application of this approach must be emphasized at the start viz. an apparently sharp breakdown of the collective-electron assumption for interatomic separations greater than some critical distance, R(. In order to illustrate the theoretical basis for this breakdown, several calculations will be considered, the first being those for the hydrogen molecule. 

FIG. 19.11 A viable classification of materials. After Janeschitz-Kriegl et al. (2005). 

Since the oxidation state concept is so important for osmium we shall make extensive use of it as a means of classification of material within ligand groups, covering the lowest oxidation states... 

The normal classification of material by oxidation state is inappropriate for nitrosyl complexes because the oxidation state concept is very much a formalism for them. Instead we shall use the generally accepted [M(NO)x] + classification in which x is the number of coordinated NO groups and n the number of metal d electrons, the latter being calculated on the basis that NO+ is the coordinated moiety. As will be apparent, osmium complexes within each such category do in fact show considerable similarities of structure and reactivity, and also with their ruthenium analogues. Osmium is unusual in forming an [M(NO)]5 type of complex. 

Table 3 Classification of materials for enhancing nasal absorption of peptide/protein drugs...

Numeric simulation is used to testify the proposed PCA methods. The reason of using numeric simulation instead of experimental data is the generality and flexibility of the simulation approach. With the aid of simulation, one can easily investigate purposefully various situations that are not likely be encountered in a few experiments. The examples based on experimental data for cluster analysis, however, will be presented in the chapter Classification of materials . 

CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS BY PROJECTION PURSUIT BASED ON GENERALIZED SIMULATED ANNEALING... 

The classification of materials according to the above criteria was more difficult than originally expected. Detailed sample information is often missing or... 

Most common fluids of simple structure are Newtonian (i.e., water, air, glycerine, oils, etc.). However, fluids with complex structures (i.e., high polymer melts or solutions, suspensions, emulsions, foams, etc.) are generally non-Newtonian. Examples of non-Newtonian behavior include mud, paint, ink, mayonnaise, shaving cream, polymer melts and solutions, toothpaste, etc. Many two-phase systems (e.g., suspensions, emulsions, foams, etc.) are purely viscous fluids and do not exhibit significant elastic or memory properties. However, many high polymer fluids (e.g., melts and solutions) are viscoelastic and exhibit both elastic (memory) as well as nonlinear viscous (flow) properties. A classification of material behavior is summarized in Table 5.1 (in which the subscripts have been omitted for simplicity). Only purely viscous Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluids are considered here. The properties and flow behavior of viscoelastic fluids are the subject of numerous books and papers (e.g., Darby, 1976 Bird et al., 1987). 

---