Classical Model and Theory

The classical model and theory of liquid phase sintering asserts that liquid phase sintering can be divided into three stages  

---

Since the development of the classical model and theory, almost all of the phenomena and kinetics of liquid phase sintering have been explained and analysed in terms of the three-stage model and theory. In particular, the theory of the second stage, contact flattening theory, has been the standard theory of liquid phase sintering for decades, despite doubts raised by some research-ergi3,i5,i6,i05,i06 validity of the basic assumptions. Modified contact... 

Chapter 1 discusses classical models up to and including Lewis s covalent bond model and Kossell s ionic bond model. It reviews ideas that are generally well known and are an important background for understanding later models and theories. Some of these models, particularly the Lewis model, are still in use today, and to appreciate later developments, their limitations need to be clearly and fully understood. 

So far, two models and theories have been developed for explaining densifi-cation during liquid phase sintering. One is the classical three-stage model and theory and the other the pore filling model and theory. ... 

Despite the possible practical applications of the classical models and virial approximations, Steele s statistical-mechanics theory constitutes the most formal and usefijl model of the behavior of adsorbed rare gases. 

The first classical trajectory study of iinimoleciilar decomposition and intramolecular motion for realistic anhannonic molecular Hamiltonians was perfonned by Bunker [12,13], Both intrinsic RRKM and non-RRKM dynamics was observed in these studies. Since this pioneering work, there have been numerous additional studies [9,k7,30,M,M, ai d from which two distinct types of intramolecular motion, chaotic and quasiperiodic [14], have been identified. Both are depicted in figure A3,12,7. Chaotic vibrational motion is not regular as predicted by tire nonnal-mode model and, instead, there is energy transfer between the modes. If all the modes of the molecule participate in the chaotic motion and energy flow is sufficiently rapid, an initial microcanonical ensemble is maintained as the molecule dissociates and RRKM behaviour is observed [9], For non-random excitation initial apparent non-RRKM behaviour is observed, but at longer times a microcanonical ensemble of states is fonned and the probability of decomposition becomes that of RRKM theory. 

Film Theory. Many theories have been put forth to explain and correlate experimentally measured mass transfer coefficients. The classical model has been the film theory (13,26) that proposes to approximate the real situation at the interface by hypothetical "effective" gas and Hquid films. The fluid is assumed to be essentially stagnant within these effective films making a sharp change to totally turbulent flow where the film is in contact with the bulk of the fluid. As a result, mass is transferred through the effective films only by steady-state molecular diffusion and it is possible to compute the concentration profile through the films by integrating Fick s law ... 

Storer model used in this theory enables us to describe classically the spectral collapse of the Q-branch for any strength of collisions. The theory generates the canonical relation between the width of the Raman spectrum and the rate of rotational relaxation measured by NMR or acoustic methods. At medium pressures the impact theory overlaps with the non-model perturbation theory which extends the relation to the region where the binary approximation is invalid. The employment of this relation has become a routine procedure which puts in order numerous experimental data from different methods. At low densities it permits us to estimate, roughly, the strength of collisions. 

Classical surface and colloid chemistry generally treats systems experimentally in a statistical fashion, with phenomenological theories that are applicable only to building simplified microstructural models. In recent years scientists have learned not only to observe individual atoms or molecules but also to manipulate them with subangstrom precision. The characterization of surfaces and interfaces on nanoscopic and mesoscopic length scales is important both for a basic understanding of colloidal phenomena and for the creation and mastery of a multitude of industrial applications. 

In the classical world (and biochemistry textbooks), transition state theory has been used extensively to model enzyme catalysis. The basic premise of transition state theory is that the reaction converting reactants (e.g. A-H + B) to products (e.g. A + B-H) is treated as a two-step reaction over a static potential energy barrier (Figure 2.1). In Figure 2.1, [A - H B] is the transition state, which can interconvert reversibly with the reactants (A-H-l-B). However, formation of the products (A + B-H) from the transition state is an irreversible step. 

To evaluate the contribution of the SHG active oriented cation complexes to the ISE potential, the SHG responses were analyzed on the basis of a space-charge model [30,31]. This model, which was proposed to explain the permselectivity behavior of electrically neutral ionophore-based liquid membranes, assumes that a space charge region exists at the membrane boundary the primary function of lipophilic ionophores is to solubilize cations in the boundary region of the membrane, whereas hydrophilic counteranions are excluded from the membrane phase. Theoretical treatments of this model reported so far were essentially based on the assumption of a double-diffuse layer at the organic-aqueous solution interface and used a description of the diffuse double layer based on the classical Gouy-Chapman theory [31,34]. 

Lamoureux G, Roux B (2003) Modeling induced polarization with classical Drude oscillators theory and molecular dynamics simulation algorithm. J Chem Phys 119(6) 3025-3039... 

Instead of the quantity given by Eq. (15), the quantity given by Eq. (10) was treated as the activation energy of the process in the earlier papers on the quantum mechanical theory of electron transfer reactions. This difference between the results of the quantum mechanical theory of radiationless transitions and those obtained by the methods of nonequilibrium thermodynamics has also been noted in Ref. 9. The results of the quantum mechanical theory were obtained in the harmonic oscillator model, and Eqs. (9) and (10) are valid only if the vibrations of the oscillators are classical and their frequencies are unchanged in the course of the electron transition (i.e., (o k = w[). It might seem that, in this case, the energy of the transition and the free energy of the transition are equal to each other. However, we have to remember that for the solvent, the oscillators are the effective ones and the parameters of the system Hamiltonian related to the dielectric properties of the medium depend on the temperature. Therefore, the problem of the relationship between the results obtained by the two methods mentioned above deserves to be discussed. 

The theory behind molecular vibrations is a science of its own, involving highly complex mathematical models and abstract theories and literally fills books. In practice, almost none of that is needed for building or using vibration spectroscopic sensors. The simple, classical mechanical analogue of mass points connected by springs is more than adequate. 

This is a recurrent theme of quantum theory. Many quantum systems can be formulated exactly in terms of a wave equation and the behaviour of the system will be described exactly by the wavefunction, the solution to the wave equation. What is not always appreciated is that this is a mathematical description only, which does not ensure understanding of the event in terms of a comprehensible physical model. The problem lies therein that the description is only possible in terms of a wave formalism. Understanding of the physical behaviour however, requires reduction to a particle model. The wave description is no more than a statistically averaged picture of the behaviour of many particles, none of which follows the actual statistically predicted course. The wave description is non-classical, and the particle model is classical. Mechanistic understanding is possible only in terms of the classical approach, and a mathematically precise description only in terms of the wave formalism. The challenge of quantum theory is to reconcile the two points of view. 

The quantum theory of the previous chapter may well appear to be of limited relevance to chemistry. As a matter of fact, nothing that pertains to either chemical reactivity or interaction has emerged. Only background material has been developed and the quantum behaviour of real chemical systems remains to be explored. If quantum theory is to elucidate chemical effects it should go beyond an analysis of atomic hydrogen. It should deal with all types of atom, molecules and ions, explain their interaction with each other and predict the course of chemical reactions as a function of environmental factors. It is not the same as providing the classical models of chemistry with a quantum-mechanical gloss a theme not without some common-sense appeal, but destined to obscure the non-classical features of molecular systems. 

---