Chemicals toxicity measurements

Two main hazards associated with chemicals are toxicity and flammability. Toxicity measurements in model species and their interpretation are largely the province of life scientists. Chemical engineers can provide assistance in helping life scientists extrapolate their resrrlts in the assessment of chemical hazards. Chemical engineers have the theoretical tools to make important contributions to modehng the transport and transformation of chemical species in the body—from the entry of species into the body to their action at the rrltimate site where they exert their toxic effect. Chemical engineers are also more likely than life scientists to appreciate... 

Workshop participants suggested that additional research should be conducted on the human health effects of POPs and that systems be established to promote the standardization of toxicity measurement of chemicals and to assess the qualifications of laboratories for toxicity appraisal. Furthermore, Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) laboratories need to be popularized in China to improve the quality and reliability of monitored data. 

In the previous chapters we saw that toxic health problems can exist even in well-organized plants, and that employees, even with the best intentions of management, can suffer from chemically induced illness. We looked at the nature of the chemistry involved, how chemicals can get into the body, and what can happen to them once they get in. We examined also the basic nature of chemical toxicity and how to measure it. When a problem exists, clearly the next step must be to control or, better yet, eliminate it. Unfortunately, the latter is seldom feasible. Generally, the best we can do is establish a degree of control. 

Less than half of the new chemical submissions received by the EPA contain any kind of test data. The EPA can obtain and review whatever toxicity or physical data on the new chemical happen to be available, such as data from literature sources, but usually there are none. For most new chemical submissions, measured values for chemical, toxicological, or environmental fate properties are not available for the E PA to use to make decisions regarding hazards or risks that the chemical may pose to human health or the environment, or its global impact. 

In the MPD-SAR study, the USEPA and the European Union compared the predicted and measured ECs for the European Union s new chemicals. The measured ECs were those reported in the European Union s MPD set of experimental toxicity summaries. When the USEPA-predicted ECs for fish and daphnid acute toxicity values were compared to the appropriate MPD-measured acute values, there was, respectively, 77% and 59% agreement, 7% and 19% underprediction, and 16% to 23% overprediction by the USEPA. Potential reasons for the under- and overprediction were investigated, and 17 of the underpredictions and 21 of the overpredictions remained unresolved. Therefore, studies that had potential problems were eliminated, and the analysis was repeated. The highest quality subset of the data indicated 87% and 79% agreement between predictions and measured values. 

Acute Toxicity Measure Acute toxicity of a chemical may be measured through different routes and by systemic exposures by injections such as subcutaneous, intravenous, intramuscular, and intratracheal, which are all used in experimental and medical support. Appropriate knowledge about measures and acute toxicity warnings of chemicals are necessary to contain chemical hazards vis-a-vis to achieve chemical safety and human health. 

Scialli, A.R., and A. Leone. 1998. Variability in human response to reproductive and developmental toxicity. Pp. 87-137 in Human Variability in Response to Chemical Exposures Measures, Modeling and Risk Assessment, D.A. Neumann, and C.A. Kimmel, eds. Washington, DC ILSI. 

Hematology, blood chemistry and pathology provide important toxicological information (Figure 4). Blood cells and chemicals are measured before and periodically throughout the experiment. Tissues from animals which die or are sacrificed are examined grossly and microscopically. These studies reveal toxic effects on all organs and functions shown. 

Another crucial aspect of the validation process is the test of how well described and represented the molecule is in the map of the chemical toxicity space that the regression equation represents. If the substructural key does not exist in the database used to build the model, then it is unlikely that the compound can be accurately estimated. In addition, if compounds similar to the test compound do not exist, then a comparison as was done above cannot be conducted and a measure of the performance of the model with compounds similar to the test material cannot be made. This type of validation requires a large database and a substructural search algorithm, and should be included in a QSAR estimate. 

Authorisation. The use of chemicals considered to be of very high concern would be subject to authorisation. The aim is for such chemicals to be phased out and substituted, unless industry can show that the use presents negligible risk or that it is acceptable, taking into account its socioeconomic benefits, the lack of safer chemicals and measures to minimise exposure. Chemicals of very high concern are likely to include carcinogens, mutagens or reprotoxic substances (CMRs), particularly persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic substances. 

---