Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Chemical degradation rate constant

Occasionally, drinking water treatment plants will have taste and odor problems that result in a lot of complaints from their customers (after all, who wants smelly drinking water ). One compound that causes this problem is called geosmin.2 Assuming this compound has a chemical degradation rate constant of 6.6 x 10-3 s 1, at what flow rate could a treatment plant with a volume of 2500 m3 be operated if a 10-min water contact time is required to remove qeosmin ... [Pg.32]

Strategy. The water contact time is the residence time of water in the plant, and from that time we can get a rate constant of 0.1 min-1 for the flow of water. The chemical degradation rate constant is 6.6 x 10 3s 1, and thus, the total rate constant is... [Pg.32]

Fig. 16.2 Degradation rate constant for methyl parathion as a function of pH, in aqueous 5.0 mM hydrogen sulfide with and without natural organic matter (NOM), at 25°C. Reprinted with permission from Guo XF, Jans U (2006) Kinetics and mechanism of the degradation of methyl parathion in aqueous hydrogen sulfide solution Investigation of natural organic matter effects. Environ Sci Technol 40 900-906. Copyright 2006 American Chemical Society... Fig. 16.2 Degradation rate constant for methyl parathion as a function of pH, in aqueous 5.0 mM hydrogen sulfide with and without natural organic matter (NOM), at 25°C. Reprinted with permission from Guo XF, Jans U (2006) Kinetics and mechanism of the degradation of methyl parathion in aqueous hydrogen sulfide solution Investigation of natural organic matter effects. Environ Sci Technol 40 900-906. Copyright 2006 American Chemical Society...
The QSAR models can be used to estimate the treatability of organic pollutants by SCWO. For two chemical classes such as aliphatic and aromatic compounds, the best correlation exists between the kinetic rate constants and EHOMO descriptor. The QSAR models are compiled in Table 10.13. By analyzing the behavior of the kinetic parameters on molecular descriptors, it is possible to establish a QSAR model for predicting degradation rate constants by the SCWO for organic compounds with similar molecular structure. This analysis may provide an insight into the kinetic mechanism that occurs with this technology. [Pg.433]

We shall see, though, that the environment does not yield totally to simple models of chemical equilibrium and chemical kinetics, and laboratory determined constants often cannot explain the field observations. For example, organic matter degradation rate constants determined from modeling are so variable that there are essentially no constraints on these values from laboratory experiments. In addition, reaction rates of CaCOa and opal dissolution determined from modeling pore waters usually cannot be reproduced in laboratory experiments of these reactions. The inability to mechanistically understand reaction kinetics calculated from diagenesis models is an important uncertainty in the field today. [Pg.3143]

The chemical adipic acid degradation rate constant, K(j, was assumed to be 0.5 M-1. This is typical of the degradation expected at pH 5.1 for systems in which manganese is present at concentrations of about 20 ppm. [Pg.239]

Additional parameters needed for the mass-balance equations are the physico-chemical properties of all transformation products considered, the degradation rate constants, and the fractions of formation of all transformation reactions. The fractions of formation account for the generation of several transformation products in parallel and for yields of less than 100%. For example, if two products are formed in roughly equal amounts and about 80% of the precursor is known to be converted into these two products, their fractions of formation are 0.4. Fractions of formation can be derived from kinetic information about a transformation pathway (see Sect. 4.1). However, because this information is often missing, most fractions of formation have to be estimated. [Pg.128]

Acetyl transfer between aspirin and sulfadiazine is a bimolecular reaction in which the translational diffusion of reactant molecules becomes rate determining when molecular mobility is limited in the solid state [33]. Therefore, it can offer a useful reaction model for understanding the ways in which chemical degradation rates in lyophilized formulations are affected by molecular mobility. Figure 17A shows the temperature dependence of the rate constant of acetyl transfer in lyophilized formulations containing dextran. Figure 17B shows the pseudo rate constant of aspirin hydrolysis that occurs in parallel with acetyl transfer in the presence of water. The rate constant of acetyl transfer ( t) and the pseudo rate constant of hydrolysis ( H> pseudo) are described by following equations ... [Pg.223]

The constant of the mechano-chemical degradation rate depends on the solution concentration ... [Pg.105]

In its simplest form a partitioning model evaluates the distribution of a chemical between environmental compartments based on the thermodynamics of the system. The chemical will interact with its environment and tend to reach an equilibrium state among compartments. Hamaker(l) first used such an approach in attempting to calculate the percent of a chemical in the soil air in an air, water, solids soil system. The relationships between compartments were chemical equilibrium constants between the water and soil (soil partition coefficient) and between the water and air (Henry s Law constant). This model, as is true with all models of this type, assumes that all compartments are well mixed, at equilibrium, and are homogeneous. At this level the rates of movement between compartments and degradation rates within compartments are not considered. [Pg.106]

First order rate constants are assumed for all degradative processes soil and water microbial degradation, hydrolysis, oxidation, photodegradation in air and water and any other mechanisms of transformation that may apply. The rate at which the chemical degrades will then be equal to the summation of the rate constants acting on the amount of chemical in each compartment summed over all compartments. [Pg.118]


See other pages where Chemical degradation rate constant is mentioned: [Pg.652]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.375]    [Pg.387]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.3604]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.112]    [Pg.413]    [Pg.112]    [Pg.275]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.585]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.1500]    [Pg.366]    [Pg.1006]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.1006]    [Pg.263]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.398]    [Pg.379]    [Pg.408]    [Pg.411]    [Pg.418]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.209]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.32 ]




SEARCH



Chemical constant

Chemical degradation

Chemical rate

Chemical rate constant

Degradation rates

© 2024 chempedia.info