Chemical Connections structure-activity relationships

Govers, H., Ruepert, C., Aiking, H. (1984) Quantitative structure-activity relationships for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons Correlation between molecular connectivity, physico-chemical properties, bioconcentration and toxicity in Daphnia pulex. Chemosphere 13, 227-236. 

That is, the given results of experimental researches have confirmed composite, chemically connected structure of ZnCFO with presence of functionally active groups, which due to the organic-inorganic nature has certain relationship with a rubber matrix, is easy dispersed and combined with its. 

In this chapter, we will give a brief introduction to the basic concepts of chemoinformatics and their relevance to chemical library design. In Section 2, we will describe chemical representation, molecular data, and molecular data mining in computer we will introduce some of the chemoinformatics concepts such as molecular descriptors, chemical space, dimension reduction, similarity and diversity and we will review the most useful methods and applications of chemoinformatics, the quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR), the quantitative structure-property relationship (QSPR), multiobjective optimization, and virtual screening. In Section 3, we will outline some of the elements of library design and connect chemoinformatics tools, such as molecular similarity, molecular diversity, and multiple objective optimizations, with designing optimal libraries. Finally, we will put library design into perspective in Section 4. 

There are several properties of a chemical that are related to exposure potential or overall reactivity for which structure-based predictive models are available. The relevant properties discussed here are bioaccumulation, oral, dermal, and inhalation bioavailability and reactivity. These prediction methods are based on a combination of in vitro assays and quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) [3]. QSARs are simple, usually linear, mathematical models that use chemical structure descriptors to predict first-order physicochemical properties, such as water solubility. Other, similar models can then be constructed that use the first-order physicochemical properties to predict more complex properties, including those of interest here. Chemical descriptors are properties that can be calculated directly from a chemical structure graph and can include abstract quantities, such as connectivity indices, or more intuitive properties, such as dipole moment or total surface area. QSAR models are parameterized using training data from sets of chemicals for which both structure and chemical properties are known, and are validated against other (independent) sets of chemicals. 

Blum, D.J.W., Suffet, I.H., Duguet, J.P. (1994) Quantitative structure-activity relationship using molecular connectivity for the activated carbon adsorption of organic chemicals in water. Water Res. 28, 687-699. 

The concept of specific receptors and sites of drug action has many origins. However, the work of Thomas Fraser and Alexander Crum Brown of Edinburgh University described in their publication of 1869, "On The Connection Between Chemical Constitution and Physiological Action", provides both a definition of structure-activity relationships and a pioneering example of chemist-pharmacologist collaboration (13). 

Three major approaches to the prediction of aqueous solubility of organic chemicals using Quantitative Structure Activity Relationship (QSAR) techniques arc reviewed. The rationale behind six QSAR models derived from these three approaches, and the quality of their fit to the experimental data are summarized. Their utility and predictive ability are examined and compared on a common basis. Three of the models employed octanol-water partition coefficient as the primary descriptor, while two others used the solvatochromic parameters. The sixth model utilized a combination of connectivity indexes and a modified polarizability parameter. Considering the case of usage, predictive ability, and the range of applicability, the model derived from the connectivity- polarizability approach appears to have greater utility value. 

A structure-activity relationship (SAR) is an empirical means of connecting the chemical reactivity or biological potency of a series of chemically related compounds to aspects of chemical structure. As a simple example, a structure-activity relationship exists between water solubility and the chain length of aliphatic alcohols and this can be formulated as follows the longer the carbon chain, the lower the water solubility. 

Finally, three further studies on QSAR of artemisininoids applying a variety of quantum-chemical and conventional molecular descriptors [105], molecular quantum-similarity measures (MQSM, [111]) and topological descriptors based on molecular connectivity [112] have led to models of quite satisfactory statistical performance. However, apart from showing the applicability of the respective QSAR approaches to this type of compounds both studies offer comparatively little new information with respect to structure-activity relationships. 

All developments of quantitative structure activity relationships (QSARs)/ quantitative structure-property relationships (QSPRs)/QSDRs go through similar steps (1) collection of a database of measured values for model development and validation/evaluation, (2) selection of chemical descriptors (can include connection indices, atom, bond, or functional groups, molecular orbital calculations), (3) development of the model (develop a correlation between the chemical descriptors and the activity/property/degradation values) using a variety of statistical approaches (linear and non-linear regression, neural networks, partial least squares (PLS), etc. [9]), and (4) validate/evaluate the model for predictability (usually try to use a separate set of chemicals other than the ones used to train the model external validation) [10]. 

While there is often focus on the poisonous effects of synthetic chemicals, the most poisonous chemicals are bacterial toxins, marine toxins, fungal toxins, mycotoxins, venoms (from snakes, insects, arachnids, and other animals), and some plant toxins. Table 4.1.1.2 shows the LD50 values for toxicants including poisons and nonpoisons. This can help you judge the relative acute toxicity of a chemical, but it does not indicate chronic or long-term toxicity. Whether a substance is fatal, toxic, or harmful also depends on the dose, of course. There is also no relationship between toxicity and whether a compound is simple or complex. The mechanism of toxicity varies greatly, and structure-activity relationships are not simple (see Chemical Connection 4.1.1.1 Structure-Activity Relationships). 

---