Charge transfer layers

High-performance all-solid-state dye-sensitized solar cells utilizing imidazolium-type ionic crystal as charge transfer layer. Chemistry of Materials, 20, 2008, 6022-6028. 

Figure Bl.28.8. Equivalent circuit for a tliree-electrode electrochemical cell. WE, CE and RE represent the working, counter and reference electrodes is the solution resistance, the uncompensated resistance, R the charge-transfer resistance, R the resistance of the reference electrode, the double-layer capacitance and the parasitic loss to tire ground.

Like bromine, iodine is soluble in organic solvents, for example chloroform, which can be used to extract it from an aqueous solution. The iodine imparts a characteristic purple colour to the organic layer this is used as a test for iodine (p. 349). NB Brown solutions are formed when iodine dissolves in ether, alcohol, and acetone. In chloroform and benzene a purple solution is formed, whilst a violet solution is produced in carbon disulphide and some hydrocarbons. These colours arise due to charge transfer (p. 60) to and from the iodine and the solvent organic molecules. 

F r d ic Current. The double layer is a leaky capacitor because Faradaic current flows around it. This leaky nature can be represented by a voltage-dependent resistance placed in parallel and called the charge-transfer resistance. Basically, the electrochemical reaction at the electrode surface consists of four thermodynamically defined states, two each on either side of a transition state. These are (11) (/) oxidized species beyond the diffuse double layer and n electrons in the electrode and (2) oxidized species within the outer Helmholtz plane and n electrons in the electrode, on one side of the transition state and (J) reduced species within the outer Helmholtz plane and (4) reduced species beyond the diffuse double layer, on the other. 

In electrode kinetics a relationship is sought between the current density and the composition of the electrolyte, surface overpotential, and the electrode material. This microscopic description of the double layer indicates how stmcture and chemistry affect the rate of charge-transfer reactions. Generally in electrode kinetics the double layer is regarded as part of the interface, and a macroscopic relationship is sought. For the general reaction... 

Comparison of the spectral response and of the power efficiency of these first conjugated polymer/fullerene bilayer devices with single layer pure conjugated polymer devices showed that the large potential of the photoinduced charge transfer of a donor-acceptor system was not fully exploited in the bilayers. The devices still suffer from antibatic behavior as well as from a low power conversion efficiency. However, the diode behavior, i.e. the rectification of these devices, was excellent. 

In two-component charge transfer systems, such as in the bulk-heterojuncdon solar cells presented here, deviations of the V,K. from the results of pristine single layer or bilayer devices are expected for two reasons first, some pan of the available difference in electrochemical energy is used internally by the charge transfer to a lower energetic position on the electron acceptor second, the relative posi-... 

Quantitatively, however, it is evident that directly measured A0 values are on average 0.2 to 0.3 eV higher than AX values. This shift in the potential scale has been discussed by Trasatti,31 34 who has attributed such a systematic difference to the different conditions of measurement (different temperatures, nonequivalence between thin water layers and bulk water, uncompensated partial charge transfer in UHV). For a more detailed discussion, the reader is referred to the original papers. 

In studies on Pt dotted silicon electrodes, PMC measurements revealed that tiny Pt dots increased the interfacial charge transfer compared with bare silicon surfaces in contact with aqueous electrolytes. However, during an aging effect, the thickness of the oxide layer between the silicon and the platinum dots gradually increased so that the kinetic advantage again decreased with time.11... 

---