Charge shift processes

In k=-/i(m+l)AR+const., where AR=3.38 A is the separation of adjacent pairs. For charge shift processes (as opposed to charge separation) between... 

In this section, we consider the SnI ionization reaction RX- R + X of r-butyl chloride (t-BuCl), also referred to as 2-chloro-2-methylpropane, in EMPPFg as a prototype of a charge shift process in an RTIL. For comparison, two conventional dipolar solvents, acetonitrile and water, are also considered. 

This section deals with a dyad designed for the study of a charge shift process (Fig. 4a). The practical problems which must be solved in the study of such a system are related to initiation and observation of the charge shift process. Limitations on the possibility to observe the intramolecular electron transfer step are essentially of technical nature, and can in principle be overcome by the use of an appropriate experimental apparatus (in terms of sensitivity and time resolution). The problems related to the initiation step, on the other hand, are of non-trivial nature. First of all, the initiation step must be faster than the intercomponent electron transfer step. Since the initiation step is reduction by an external source, it may not be easy to find experimental conditions that would satisfy this requirement. Moreover, in the initiation the initial reduction of the dyad must take place at the thermodynamically less favoured site. This is hard to achieve by chemical reduction, unless extremely powerful external reductants, acting in a nearly statistical fashion towards the two redox sites, are used (e.g., solvated electrons and other reducing radicals used in pulse radiolysis) [10]. The "trick used here to overcome this problem... 

In a general description of intramolecular electron-transfer (ET) processes one has to differentiate between charge separation in donor/acceptor (D/A) systems via the formation of photoexcited states and a charge-transfer or charge-shift reaction that is thermally activated (Cannon, 1980 Fox and Chanon, 1988 Meyer, 1978). 

A simple description of the charge transfer process in molecular orbital terms is that electron density is back-donated from metal d-bands into the CO ir orbital, which is anti-bonding in character (14). The relatively small size of the frequency shift implies that the extent of charge transfer is small. As a result, the C-0 bond order is still close to 3.0 for linearly adsorbed molecules. 

There are no charge shifts in this process, g, remaining equal to unity at all atoms. The limiting n electron distribution therefore indicates localization of a single tt electron at the position of attack as required for the case of a radical reaction. The inequalities (64) and (66) thus cover all three cases envisaged in the localization theory. 

Normally, the reaction partners in PET reactions are neutral molecules. That is why a donor radical cation—acceptor radical anion pair is obtained by the PET step. These highly reactive intermediates can be used for triggering interesting reactions. Since the PET is not restricted to neutral molecules PET reactions of donor anions and neutral acceptors or neutral donors and acceptor cations resulting in radical—radical anion (cation) pairs are known as well. These reactions are also called charge shift reactions due to the fact that the overall number of charged species is kept constant throughout the PET step. Finally, a PET process of a donor anion and a acceptor cation is possible as well (Scheme 2). 

In the case of an irreversible charge-transfer process the rate of electron transfer is insufficient to maintain the charge-transfer process at equilibrium. The shape of the cyclic voltammogram is modified and peak positions shift as a function of scan rate (unlike the reversible case). A more detailed discussion can be found elsewhere.93... 

In n-hexane, a similar band with a maximum at around 384 nm was observed with a comparably fast risetime, so that one can conclude that the photoinduced charge-transfer process in this fluorinated derivative is a quasi-barrierless process in both polar and non-polar solvents. Preliminary DFT calculations indicate that in vacuum DMABN-F4 is nonplanar in the ground state in contrast to DMABN [7]. The fact that the observed CT state absorption spectrum is blue-shifted compared to that of DMABN and of the benzonitrile anion radical (Fig. 3) might be an indication that the equilibrium geometry of the CT state of DMABN-F4 is different from that of the TICT state of DMABN or might be due to the influence of the four fluorine atoms. 

The influence of the chemical kinetics is analyzed in Fig. 4.31 where ADDPV curves are plotted for different values of the dimensionless rate constant %2(= (k + ki)zi). For comparison, the curve corresponding to a simple, reversible charge transfer process (Er) of species C + B for the CE mechanism and of species A for the EC one has also been plotted (dashed line in Fig. 4.31a, b). As can be observed, the behavior of ADDPV curves with is very different depending on the reaction scheme. For the CE mechanism with K = (1 /Kepeak current increases and the peak potential shifts toward more negative values as the kinetics is faster, that is, as xi increases. For very fast chemical reactions, the ADDPV signal is equivalent to that of a reversible E mechanism (Er) with... 

As can be seen in this figure, the combined effect of ohmic drop and double-layer capacitance is much more serious in the case of CV. The increase of the scan rate (and therefore of the current) causes a shift of the peak potentials which is 50 mV for the direct peak in the case of the CV with v = 100 V s 1 with respect to a situation with Ru = 0 (this shift can be erroneously attributed to a non-reversible character of the charge transfer process see Sect. 5.3.1). Under the same conditions the shift in the peak potential observed in SCV is 25 mV. Concerning the increase of the current observed, in the case of CV the peak current has a value 26 % higher than that in the absence of the charging current for v = 100 Vs 1, whereas in SCV this increase is 11 %. In view of these results, it is evident that these undesirable effects in the current are much less severe in the case of multipulse techniques, due to the discrete nature of the recorded current. The CV response can be greatly distorted by the charging and double-layer contributions (see the CV response for v = 500 V s-1) and their minimization is advisable where possible. 

Equations (5.83) and (5.84) and the curves in Fig. 5.12 indicate that both peak current and potential of the CV curves change with the scan rate, a feature which is not observed for the peak potential of reversible processes (see Eq. (5.57)). However, the experimental evidence that for a given system the potential peak of the cathodic CV curves shifts to more negative values with increasing scan rate should be used with caution when assigning a non-reversible behavior to the system since, similar displacements can be observed for Nemstian systems when the ohmic drop has an important effect (see Fig. 5.11). Thus, the shift of the CV peak potential with the scan rate is not always a guarantee of a non-reversible charge transfer process. 

---