Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Charge differences factor

To the best of our knowledge the sensitivity of FEP calculations to this overestimation of electrostatic interaction has received little attention. Cox et al24 did use scaled 6-31G charges in their successful treatment of the 1,2,3-and 1,2,4-triazole tautomer equilibria, but no comparison was made with unsealed charges. This factor could however be of crucial importance in calculation of tautomeric equilibria, where fine differences are important. [Pg.134]

C—The only applicable factor listed is the charge difference. The chloride ion is larger than the fluoride ion. The ion ratio is not important. [Pg.176]

Thermally weighted Franck-Condon factor Fragment charge difference (method)... [Pg.39]

It is difficult to attribute quantitatively by experiment the rate enhancements of the different factors contributing to catalysis. Protein engineering can get close to accurate answers when dealing with nonpolar interactions, especially in subsites. But analysis of mutation is at its weakest when altering residues that interact with charges (Chapter 15). The next development must be in improved methods of computer simulation. Controversies arise when there are no intermediates in the reaction because the kinetics can fit more than one mechanism. Again, computer simulation will provide the ultimate answers. [Pg.262]

In the Tt state of the radical cation, charge stabilization is affected by different factors. Most important is the interaction of the CN tt orbitals with orbitals of tt symmetry in R. [Pg.337]

Reduction to the zero-valent state or formation of other metal solid phases like oxides, causes the element to deposit onto the semiconductor surface. The efficiency of the photocatalytic reaction depends on different factors. One of the most critical aspects is the high probability of electron-hole recombination, which competes with the separation of the photogenerated charges. On the other hand, as there is no physical separation between the anodic reaction site (oxidation by holes) and the cathodic one (reduction by electrons), back reactions can be of importance. The low efficiency is one of the most severe limitations of heterogeneous photo catalysis. [Pg.358]

In the present article, various fundamental photoelectrochemical effects are quantitatively described and discussed, with the main emphasis on the kinetics of charge transfer processes. Although in principle the same reaction mechanisms are valid for extended semiconductor electrodes and particles, different factors govern the reaction rate, as will be discussed in detail. Finally, a brief overview of various applications will be given. [Pg.107]

In order to test such an application we have calculated the spin and charge structure factors from a theoretical wave function of the iron(III)hexaaquo ion by Newton and coworkers ( ). This wave function is of double zeta quality and assumes a frozen core. Since the distribution of the a and the B electrons over the components of the split basis set is different, the calculation goes beyond the RHF approximation. A crystal was simulated by placing the complex ion in a lOxIOxlOA cubic unit cell. Atomic scattering factors appropriate for the radial dependence of the Gaussian basis set were calculated and used in the analysis. [Pg.54]

As is the case with the PtCls complexes (276), unsaturated alcohols form more stable complexes than do the corresponding unsaturated ammonium ions (277). The stability constants are, however, two or three orders of magnitude smaller with Ag+ than with PtClg and the difference is greater with the ammonium ions than with the alcohols, probably as a result of the difference in charge on the metallic species (277). This charge difference may be also an important factor in determining whether the cr or tt component predominates in the coordinate bond. [Pg.347]

The large areas of the oil-water interfaces in an emulsion have proved important in several chemical operations—emulsion polymerizations, saponifications, and the condensation of peptides. The particular influence of the interface depends on many different factors, including the increased opportunity offered for reaction between oil-soluble and water-soluble components, the possibility that the surface may bear an electrical charge, and the uniform orientation of the superficial reactant molecules under the action of the directive forces of the two different liquids. [Pg.46]

The adaptation of these enzymes to extreme environments is related to different factors that influence their 3D structure. Among them changes in specific amino acid residues (mainly glycine), increased number of ion pairs formed, increase in the extent of secondary structure formation and truncated amino and carboxyl termini, increased hydrophobic interaction at subunit interfaces, reduction in the size of loops and in the number of cavities, and an excess of negatively charged amino acids on the protein surface [435,436]... [Pg.142]

The Helmholtz-von Smoluchowski equation indicates that under constant composition of the electrolyte solution, the electro-osmotic flow depends on the magnitude of the zeta potential which is determined by many different factors, the most important being the dissociation of the silanol groups on the capillary wall, the charge density in the Stern layer, and the thickness of the diffuse layer. Each of these factors depends on several variables, such as pH, specific adsorption of ionic species in the compact region of the electric double layer, ionic strength, viscosity, and temperature. [Pg.588]

Table M-5. Charge scaling factors b for different atom chemical types. Table M-5. Charge scaling factors b for different atom chemical types.
Thus, as a summary, Tafel slopes of the i-V curves observed on differently doped materials, although they have similar values, are determined by different factors. The experimentally observed values of about 60 mV/decade in the exponential region are due to several factors which have different effects on the current-potential relationship (1) relative potential drops in the space charge layer and the Helmholtz layer (2) increase in surface area during the course of an i-V curve measurement due to formation of PS which tends to reduce the slope (3) change of the dissolution valence with potential which has an effect of reducing the slope if a significant part of the potential is dropped in the Helmholtz layer (4) electron injection into the conduction band which reduces the slope and (5) potential drops in the bulk semiconductor and electrolyte, which increases the slope. [Pg.195]


See other pages where Charge differences factor is mentioned: [Pg.391]    [Pg.356]    [Pg.475]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.314]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.910]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.437]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.551]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.286]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.191]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.427]    [Pg.428]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.567]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.3848]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.110]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.125 ]




SEARCH



Charge difference

Charge factor

Factor difference

© 2024 chempedia.info