Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Theoretical wave function

Eor specific models of the nucleus, it is possible to compute theoretical wave functions for the states. Eor a model that assumes that the nucleus is spherical, the general properties of these wave functions have been used to compute theoretical estimates of the half-hves for y-rays of the various multipolarities. Some values from the Weisskopf estimate of these half-hves are shown in Table 7. These half-fives decrease rapidly with the y-ray energy, namely, as and, as Table 7 shows, increase rapidly with E. This theoretical half-life applies only to the y-ray decay, so if there are other modes of... [Pg.449]

Nuclear rocket, solid-core, 17 592 Nuclear standards, 15 767 Nuclear states, theoretical wave functions for, 21 299... [Pg.638]

Since the spherical core- and valence-scattering factors in the multipole expansion are based on theoretical wave functions, expressions for the corresponding density functions are needed in the analytical evaluation of the integrals in Eqs. (8.35)... [Pg.177]

The relevance of resonance-theoretic wave-functions naturally suggests at least one more derivative VB model, obtained by restriction of the covalent-space (Heisenberg) VB model to the subspace of (neighbor-paired) Kekule structures. In fact a whole hierarchy of models begins to emerge, as discussed a little more in the next section. [Pg.459]

In order to test such an application we have calculated the spin and charge structure factors from a theoretical wave function of the iron(III)hexaaquo ion by Newton and coworkers ( ). This wave function is of double zeta quality and assumes a frozen core. Since the distribution of the a and the B electrons over the components of the split basis set is different, the calculation goes beyond the RHF approximation. A crystal was simulated by placing the complex ion in a lOxIOxlOA cubic unit cell. Atomic scattering factors appropriate for the radial dependence of the Gaussian basis set were calculated and used in the analysis. [Pg.54]

Examination of Eq. (30) and (32) shows the hyperfine interaction to be strongly dependent on the distribution of unpaired electrons in the vicinity of the nucleus and as such provides a sensitive testing ground for theoretical wave functions. Researchers working with free radicals often talk about determining the spin density from the hyperfine interaction but this is not strictly correct. A true spin density ps would be computed from the molecular wave function in the following manner... [Pg.429]

Small metal clusters are also of interest because of their importance in catalysis. Despite the fact that small clusters should consist of mostly surface atoms, measurement of the photon ionization threshold for Hg clusters suggest that a transition from van der Waals to metallic properties occurs in the range of 20-70 atoms per cluster [88] and near-bulk magnetic properties are expected for Ni, Pd, and Pt clusters of only 13 atoms [89] Theoretical calculations on Sin and other semiconductors predict that the stmcture reflects the bulk lattice for 1000 atoms but the bulk electronic wave functions are not obtained [90]. Bartell and co-workers [91] study beams of molecular clusters with electron dirfraction and molecular dynamics simulations and find new phases not observed in the bulk. Bulk models appear to be valid for their clusters of several thousand atoms (see Section IX-3). [Pg.270]

Importantly for direct dynamics calculations, analytic gradients for MCSCF methods [124-126] are available in many standard quantum chemistiy packages. This is a big advantage as numerical gradients require many evaluations of the wave function. The evaluation of the non-Hellmann-Feynman forces is the major effort, and requires the solution of what are termed the coupled-perturbed MCSCF (CP-MCSCF) equations. The large memory requirements of these equations can be bypassed if a direct method is used [233]. Modem computer architectures and codes then make the evaluation of first and second derivatives relatively straightforward in this theoretical framework. [Pg.301]

IT. Total Molecular Wave Functdon TIT. Group Theoretical Considerations TV. Permutational Symmetry of Total Wave Function V. Permutational Symmetry of Nuclear Spin Function VT. Permutational Symmetry of Electronic Wave Function VIT. Permutational Symmetry of Rovibronic and Vibronic Wave Functions VIIT. Permutational Symmetry of Rotational Wave Function IX. Permutational Symmetry of Vibrational Wave Function X. Case Studies Lis and Other Systems... [Pg.551]

In Chapter VIII, Haas and Zilberg propose to follow the phase of the total electronic wave function as a function of the nuclear coordinates with the aim of locating conical intersections. For this purpose, they present the theoretical basis for this approach and apply it for conical intersections connecting the two lowest singlet states (Si and So). The analysis starts with the Pauli principle and is assisted by the permutational symmetry of the electronic wave function. In particular, this approach allows the selection of two coordinates along which the conical intersections are to be found. [Pg.770]

Drowicz F W and W A Goddard IB 1977. The Self-Consistent Field Equations for Generalized Valence Bond and Open-Shell Hartree-Fock Wave Functions. In Schaeffer H F III (Editor). Modem Theoretical Chemistry III, New York, Plenum, pp. 79-127. [Pg.180]

The amount of spin contamination is given by the expectation value of die operator, (S ). The theoretical value for a pure spin state is S S + 1), i.e. 0 for a singlet (Sz = 0), 0.75 for a doublet (S = 1/2), 2.00 for a triplet (S = 1) etc. A UHF singlet wave function will contain some amounts of triplet, quintet etc. states, increasing the (S ) value from its theoretical value of zero for a pure spin state. Similarly, a UHF doublet wave function will contain some amounts of quartet, sextet etc. states. Usually the contribution from the next higher spin state from the desired is... [Pg.114]

From the above it should be clear that UHF wave functions which are spin contaminated (more than a few percent deviation of (S ) from the theoretical value of S S + 1)) have disadvantages. For closed-shell systems an RHF procedure is therefore normally preferred. For open-shell systems, however, the UHF method has been heavily used. It is possible to use an ROHF type wave function for open-shell systems, but this leads to computational procedures which are somewhat more complicated than for the UHF case when electron correlation is introduced. [Pg.116]

The correlation of electron motion in molecular systems is responsible for many important effects, but its theoretical treatment has proved to be very difficult. Thus many quantum valence calculations use wave functions which are adjusted to optimize kinetic energy effects and the potential energy of interaction of nuclei and electrons but which do not adequately allow for electron correlation and hence yield excessive electron repulsion energy. This problem may be subdivided into cases of overlapping and nonoverlapping electron distributions. Both are very important but we shall concern ourselves here with only the nonoverlapping case. [Pg.59]


See other pages where Theoretical wave function is mentioned: [Pg.483]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.483]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.360]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.192]    [Pg.224]    [Pg.279]    [Pg.356]    [Pg.396]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.263]    [Pg.744]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.40 ]




SEARCH



Theoretical functionality

© 2024 chempedia.info