Characterization studies protocols application

One of the most widely used tools to assess protein dynamics are different heteronuclear relaxation parameters. These are in intimate connection with internal dynamics on time scales ranging from picoseconds to milliseconds and there are many approaches to extract dynamical information from a wide range of relaxation data (for a thorough review see Ref. 1). Most commonly 15N relaxation is studied, but 13C and 2H relaxation are the prominent tools to characterize side-chain dynamics.70 Earliest applications utilized 15N Ti, T2 relaxation as well as heteronuclear H- N) NOE experiments to characterize N-H bond motions in the protein backbone.71 The vast majority of studies applied the so-called model-free approach to translate relaxation parameters into overall and internal mobility. Its name contrasts earlier methods where explicit motional models of the N-H vector were used, for example diffusion-in-a-cone or two- or three-site jump, etc. Unfortunately, we cannot obtain information about the actual type of motion of the bond. As reconciliation, the model-free approach yields motional parameters that can be interpreted in each of these motional models. There is a well-established protocol to determine the exact combination of parameters to invoke for each bond, starting from the simplest set to the most complex one until the one yielding satisfactory description is reached. The scheme, a manifestation of the principle of Occam s razor is shown in Table l.72... 

Additional parameters that are readily incorporated into a stand-alone immune function test such as the KLH-TDAR model include ex vivo lymphocyte proliferation, cytokine protein expression, and immunophenotype analysis any or all of which can enhance hazard identification and characterization of a potential immunotoxicant. While the KLH-TDAR is an example of a combined immune function screen and mechanistic study, the ex vivo methodologies described herein are generally applicable to toxicology studies that do not include an immunization protocol. Moreover, the methodologies are not species-specific however, responsiveness to various stimulants to induce ex vivo lymphocyte proliferation and cytokine production may differ across species and strain, requiring procedural optimization for a given species and ex vivo test. 

The volume is organized into three sections, each of which addresses fundamental and practical realization of the production of nanostructured materials. The first section deals with the preparation, characterization, and transport properties of this unique class of materials. Structural and chemical heterogeneity are the result of preparation protocols, and various spectroscopies can be used to characterize these properties. Transport of adsorbates is affected by both intraparticle and interparticle resistance, which can greatly influence applications in practical processes. Each of these topics is represented as a case study that is general enough in scope that cautious application of the reported results can be extended to other systems of technological importance. 

These recent data indicate that MALDI-TOF MS has the potential to directly detect the most clinically important AmpC P-lactamases, such as the CMY-2-like, ACC, and DHA types, in clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae. In agreement with other MALDI-TOF MS applications (Hrabak 2013), the described protocol is quick and economical. In addition, detection of p-lactamases by MALDI-TOF MS in a proteomic approach allowing the study of the behavior of the tested strains can complement the already used techniques for characterization of P-lactamases, such as PCR and isoelectric focusing (lEF). MALDI-TOF MS can directly detect the class A (Camara and Hays 2007) and class C p-lactamases, as well as other mechanisms such as methylation of rRNA and cell wall components (Cai et al. 2012 Hrabak et al. 2013). We conclude that establishing a MALDI-TOF supplementary database of resistance mechanisms would promote further research in this field. 

---