Cavity fields evolution

An interesting problem is the field evolution in a cavity that was initially in the equilibrium state at a finite temperature, when the initial occupation numbers were given by the Planck distribution v = [exp(pw) — 1] 1. Let us consider two limit cases. The first one corresponds to the low-temperature approximation v = exp (—(] ). Then the occupation number of the mth mode is merely the coefficient at vm in the expansion (61) with u = exp( (5). Using the well-known generating function of the Legendre polynomials Pm(z) [Ref. 269, Eq. 10.10(39)], one can obtain the following expression (for y = 0) ... 

The limit cycle is an attractor. A slightly different kind occurs in the theory of the laser Consider the electric field in the laser cavity interacting with the atoms, and select a single mode near resonance, having a complex amplitude E. One then derives from a macroscopic description laced with approximations the evolution equation... 

The formation of RES and their evolution into post-solitons have been observed in three-dimensional simulations as well [14], The EM structure of the three-dimensional soliton is such that the electric field is poloidal and the magnetic field is toroidal. Therefore it is named a TM-soliton. The soliton core is characterized by an overall positive charge, resulting in its Coulomb explosion and in the acceleration of the ion. On the long time-scale, the quasi-neutral plasma cavity is subject to a slow continuous radial expansion, while the soliton amplitude decreases and the ion temperature increases. 

The evolution of classical fields in the cavities filled in with media whose dielectric properties vary in time was considered, for example, as far back as in... 

At which extent the traditional definition of zeolites is still valid Are zeolite scientists still dealing with "crystalline aluminosilicates containing pores and cavities of molecular dimensions" [ 1 J, or did they create new materials original enough to render this time-honoured definition obsolete Indeed, the zeolite community has pushed afar the borders of his field of interest, as any healthy body of scientists has to do. Zeolite researchers presently deal with nanopores instead of micropores, self-assembly instead of synthesis, and they prepare periodical structures from any comer of the periodical table, well beyond the limits of the class of ordered silicates. The evolution of the subject (and of the vocabulary used to describe it) has been astounding and somewhat refreshing but the core of the activity of the zeolite scientist is still the same as it was when Barrer described the first documented synthetic zeolite in 1948 [2] to apply up-to-date characterisation techniques to the design, synthesis and application of periodical self-assembled objects. 

There are also some other ideas about possible ways to make the calculation of the gradient and of the Hessian more effective, but we limit ourselves to expose topics for which there is a working computer code. The field is in evolution but surely progresses towards computational methods with computational costs and range of applicability comparable to those used for molecules in vacuo are within reach. In our opinion the most difficult point is to find search algorithms for critical points able to treat in a more efficient way some small roughness in the PES introduced by the tessellation of the cavity surface. 

Kauffman focuses on examples such as exaptation, when a swim bladder became a lung, and says, in essence, who could have predicted that I, for one, could not have predicted that—but that s not the kind of predictability we have. Chemical evolution is not a specific prediction, but a narrowing of options and a tilting of the field. I could predict that somewhere some species would evolve the ability to collect oxygen-rich air in an open cavity (whether it comes from a swim bladder or some other air sac). The cells exposed to oxygen s chemical potential will evolve mechanisms to withstand its toxicity, and then to use its carbon-burning power. 

The time evolution of such a system is described by a 2 °x2 °matrix This demonstrates the complexity of quantum mechanical time evolution. At the same time it becomes clear that quantum systems have - due to the fact that they describe the evolution of all possible states simultaneously - a sort of inner parallelism . Therefore, they will be an ideal medium for real parallel computations as soon as the dynamical behaviour of the quantum states can be controlled in isolation from the rest of the world (with which an interaction is only needed if one wants to read out the result). New experimental possibilities for realizing quantum computers, ranging from neutral atoms interacting with microwaves over optical cavities and nuclear spins to trapped ions, offer most promising perspectives [15]. The chapters by Tino Gramss and Thomas Pellizzari on the Theory of Quantum Computation and First Steps Towards a Realization of Quantum Computers, respectively, will introduce the reader to recent developments in this exciting field. 

---