Causality determining

Finally, Ansell Pearson, virtually a biologist in philosopher s clothing, finds the critique of the philosophers of becoming congenial to his own point of view on mechanism and causal determinism. He tells his reader ... 

Alex Rosenberg My inclination is to say that it doesn t because most reductionists are perfectly happy to accept chaotic phenomena as an epis-temic limit on predictability and not a limit on either on the understandability of a system or on the degree of its determinism, whether upward in its causal determinism or not. 

John Dupre I don t quite know where the interesting but fairly robust came from. I ve conceded throughout this talk a couple of points, that there are causal determinants of people s brains that included genetic determinants. What I m denying is the evidence for any interesting robust genetic determinants that are relevant to the kinds of behaviours that they re (frequently) talking about. 

If we do have, and include, a priori knowledge in addition to the measurements or numerical data we should use methods from the second family of basic data analysis methods. Here the data are considered to be grouped in respect of the objects, or maybe in respect of the features. Within this family we may further distinguish between non-causally and causally determined data, or by analogy with correlation and regression, we may distinguish between multivariate relationships and dependencies. 

Principal components analysis (PCA) and factor analysis (FA) are aimed at finding and interpreting hidden complex, and possibly causally determined, relationships between features in a data set. Correlating features are converted to the so-called factors which are themselves noncorrelated. 

A concern about the above correlates is that they do not imply causation. Because covaries with other purported causal determinants of social outcomes, for example SES, the causal antecedents of its correlates are equivocal. In Terman s (1925— 1959) famous longitudinal study of intellectually gifted participants, for example, subjects were appreciably above the norm on several educational and vocational criteria. On various indices of physical and psychological health, they were also significantly better off than normative base rate expectations would lead one to... 

Colon cancer is one of the main causes of cancer mortality in Western societies [150]. About 15-20% of colorectal tumors are causally determined by inheritance of genetic alterations such as the hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) and the syndrome familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) [151,152]. Microsatellite instability, a characteristic of HNPCC, is caused by mutations in the genes essential for mismatch repair. The loss of mismatch repair has several consequences most crucially, the loss of proofreading and correction of small deletions and insertions. FAP is a rare autosomal dominant syndrome caused by an inherited mutation in the APC gene. The disease is characterized by the development of multiple colorectal adenomas, numbering from a few polyps to several thousands. 

Creating meaningful customer service and service quality standards plays a role in establishing the company as an outstanding customer-oriented organization. Few comptmies and oiganizations have standards, and those who have them do not tie them to strategy and mission. But a few have standards that they have found to be causal determinants of customer satisfaction and profitability. These companies are leaders in their fields. 

If causal determinism is true, that probability will be i if indeterminism is true, it may fall short of i.) Another principle he invokes, but does not label -1 will call it the no effects without physical effects principle — is that if a mental event is a cause of another mental event, then it is a cause (is among the causes) of some physical event or other." 1 will not attempt to determine whether Kims argument for his position is successful. 1 note only that these... 

If some R-elements remain not causally determined then assign a causality to one and propagate as previously. Repeat this step until all the R-elements are causally determined. 

A system s interaction can be identified with any type of reciprocation of balances. The number of parameters is often greater than the number of balance laws, so it is necessary to have other axioms and interconnections. Among the most important are causality, determinism, equipresence, objectivity, material invariance, time irreversibility, and the decisive effect of nearest neighbors, and nearby history. 

If possible, there should be measurement of the toxic effect in order quantitatively to relate the observations made to the degree of exposure (exposure dose). Ideally, there is a need to determine quantitatively the toxic response to several differing exposure doses, in order to determine the relationship, if any, between exposure dose and the nature and magnitude of any effect. Such dose—response relationship studies are of considerable value in determining whether an effect is causally related to the exposure material, in assessing the possible practical (in-use) relevance of the exposure conditions, and to allow the most reasonable estimates of hazard. 

The results of the study should allow decisions on whether injury is a direct result of toxicity or secondary to other events. In addition to confirming a causal relationship between exposure to the test material and development of an injury, the study should be reviewed in order to assess whether information is available to determine if the effect is traceable to parent material or metaboUte. 

Because of the assumed (temporal depth of two) nature of the reversibility of the underlying universal CA, causality takes on a decidedly non intuitive character the state of a given site is completely determined by the states of its nearest neighbors in space-time. Letting ag t represent the state of the site at x and time t,... 

Further below, I will refer to a Bayesian causal network approach that does attempt to infer causation from microarray data. Furthermore, as Lander suggests, the microarray data, suitably constrained, may be used to generate causal hypotheses that can then be tested in other experiments and contexts. Thus, there are strategies that may be able to address this difficulty of determining causation. 

---