Catalytic reactions bulk bases

The use of catalytic SILP materials has been reviewed recently [10] covering Friedel-Crafts reactions [33-37], hydroformylations (Rh-catalyzed) [38], hydrogenation (Rh-catalyzed) [39,40], Heck reactions (Pd-catalyzed) [41], and hydroaminations (Rh-, Pd-, and Zn-catalyzed) [42]. Since then, the SILP concept has been extended to additional catalytic reactions and alternative support materials. In this paper we will present results from continuous, fixed-bed carbonylation and hydroformylation reactions using rhodium-based SILP catalysts as reaction examples demonstrating the advantages of the SILP technology for bulk chemical production. 

Since the classification is essentially based on rates of catalytic reactions relative to rates of diffusion of redox carriers, there are oxidation reactions that are intermediate between the two limiting cases. We note that neither the molecular size nor the polarity of reactant molecules is the principal characteristic determining the type of catalysis. Although oxide ions migrate rapidly in the bulk, bulk type II catalysis is not observed for oxidation catalyzed by Bi-Mo oxides. In this case the rate-limiting step is a surface reaction. 

As a first approximation a convective term in the film region has been negleted, u is the superficial gas velocity and u f denotes the gas velocity at minimum fluidization conditions. Tne specific mass transfer area a(h) is based on unit volume of the expanded fluidized bed and e OO is the bubble gas hold-up at a height h above the bottom plate. Mathematical expressions for these two latter quantities may be found in detail in (20). The concentrations of the reactants in the bubble phase and in film and bulk of the suspension phase are denoted by c, c and c, respectively. The rate constant for the first order heterogeneous catalytic reaction of the component i to component j is denoted... 

Ahlberg and coworkers have found that lithiated 1-methylimidazole (21) and lithiated 1,2-dimethylimidazole (22) work as such bulk bases in the presence of catalytic amounts of a readily accessible homochiral lithium amide 20 (both enantiomers are readily available) (see Section III.C)45,46. These new bulk bases are easily accessible by deprotonation of 1-methylimidazole and 1,2-dimethylimidazole by, e.g., n-BuLi (Scheme 72). Using chiral lithium amide 20 (20 mol%) and bulk base 21 or 22 (200 mol%) in the deprotonation of cyclohexene oxide 1 gave (S)-2 with the same enantiomeric excess (93%) as under stoichiometric conditions (Scheme 15). Apparently, any background reactions of the bulk bases are insignificant. Interestingly, no addition of DBU was needed to obtain the high enantioselectivities under these catalytic conditions. 

With the advent of synthetic methods to produce more advanced model systems (cluster- or nanoparticle-based systems either in the gas phase or on planar surfaces), we come to the modern age of surface chemistry and heterogeneous catalysis. Castleman and coworkers demonstrate the large influence that charge, size, and composition of metal oxide clusters generated in the gas phase can have on the mechanism of a catalytic reaction. Rupprechter (Chap. 15) reports on the stmctural and catalytic properties of planar noble metal nanocrystals on thin oxide support films in vacuum and under high-pressure conditions. The theme of model systems of nanoparticles supported on planar metal oxide substrates is continued with a chapter on the formation of planar catalyst based on size-selected cluster deposition methods. In a second contribution from Rupprecther (Chap. 17), the complexities of surface chemistry and heterogeneous catalysis on metal oxide films and nanostructures, where the extension of the bulk structure to the surface often does not occur and the surface chemistry is often dominated by surface defects, are discussed. 

Structural sensitivity of the catalytic reactions is one of the most important problems in heterogeneous catalysis [1,2]. It has been rather thoroughly studied for metals, while for oxides, especially for dispersed ones, situation is far less clear due to inherent complexity of studies of their bulk and surface atomic structure. In last years, successful development of such methods as HREM and STM along with the infrared spectroscopy of test molecules has formed a sound bases for elucidating this problem in the case of oxides. In the work presented, the results of the systematic studies of the bulk/surface defect structure of the oxides of copper, iron, cobalt, chromium, manganese as related to structural sensitivity of the reactions of carbon monoxide and hydrocarbons oxidation are considered. 

The first one is a general methodology developed by Abu-Reziq et al [26,27] for the conversion of fully hydrophobic catalytic reactions - the catalyst, the substrate, and the product, are all hydrophobic - into a catalytic reaction that is carried out in water, eliminating the need for organic solvents. The method is based on a three-phase system composed of an emulsion (oil in water of the substrate and product molecule) and a solid (the catalysts), and was termed the EST (emulsion/solid transport) process. The idea (Figure 31.11) relies on the transport of hydrophobic substrates to an entrapped catalyst, and the transport of the resulting product from the catalyst porous solid back into the bulk. Specifically, the catalyst is entrapped inside a hydrophobically modified porous sol-gel matrix the hydrophobic substrate for that catalyst is emulsified in water in the presence of a suitable surfactant and the powdered catalytic sol-gel material is dispersed in that emulsion. Upon contact of the surfactant with the hydrophobic interface of the sol-gel matrix, it reorients and spills the substrate into the pores... 

---