Catalysts systems activity, factors determining

The difference in the preferred binding mode observed for the Pd- and Ni-based catalysts can be the crucial factor determining activity/inactivity of these two systems in polar copolymerization. However, the question arises about the stability of the alternative binding modes at finite temperature. If the minima were separated by relatively low barriers and fast interconversion between the two isomer complexes could occur, then this difference would be of minor importance. In order to check the stability of the two modes and get the insight into the mechanism of possible interconversions, a series of molecular dynamics simulations was performed. 

The distinction between true and apparent activation enquiries is important to draw for several reasons. (1) In trying to understand how catalyst structure and composition affect activity, there are two factors to consider a thermochemical factor determining the concentration of reacting species, and a kinetic factor controlling their reactivity. Ea contains both, and only when E, and the relevant heats of adsorption are separated can their individual contributions be assessed. (2) Ea is not a fundamental characteristic of a catalytic system, because its value may depend on the reactant pressures used. As we shall see in Section 5.5, there are very helpful correlations to be drawn between kinetic parameters, reactant pressures and orders, and structure sensitivity in the field of hydrocarbon reactions. 

The reactivity of various cycloolefins in copolymerization reactions with ethylene and 2-butene has been examined using V(acac)3/Et2AlCl and VCl4/Hex3Al as the catalysts [21]. It was observed that, while the catalyst system has little effect on the relative reactivity of the cycloolefin, the nature of the cyclic and acychc monomer proved to be quite determinant for reaction kinetics and stereospecificity. In this respect, cyclopentene and cycloheptene displayed high reactivity compared to cyclohexene and cyclooctene, while cis-2-butene was more reactive than tra 5-2-butene. These observations were rationalized by considering steric factors induced by monomers rather than catalyst activity and specificity. 

Three factors that may influence relative rates are (1) choice of catalyst (if applicable) (2) temperature and (3) concentration of reactant(s). If a reacting system is subject to catalytic activity, this is usually the dominant factor (relative to the noncatalyzed reaction), and the choice of catalyst, although difficult to quantify, can greatly influence which of two (or more) parallel reactions predominates. The next most important factor may be temperature although all the rates (in parallel) increase with increasing T, we should determine if any feature allows one rate to increase or decrease preferentially. A similar consideration applies to concentration(s) of reactant(s). 

We carried out the reaction in a flow system under conditions such that the conversion level was high but well below equilibrium conversion. We used C.P. 1-butene from Matheson and passed it over 100-200 mesh Mobil silica-alumina catalyst [10% AljOj surface area, 393m g (BET)] the batch was heated 1 hr at 450°C in an air stream and kept in a closed container. Gas chromatographic analysis was used neither reactant impurity nor a thermal rate was found to be a complicating factor. The reaction was carried out at 120, 135, 150, and 165°C at several partial pressures, using N2 as diluent, up to 0.95 atm. The reactant flow rate was always 1.56 x 10" mole min A steady state was achieved in about 20 min, and the activity for a run was taken to be the average of three determinations made between 35 and 50 min. 

Eichhom and his co-workers have thoroughly studied the kinetics of the formation and hydrolysis of polydentate Schiff bases in the presence of various cations (9, 10, 25). The reactions are complicated by a factor not found in the absence of metal ions, i.e, the formation of metal chelate complexes stabilizes the Schiff bases thermodynamically but this factor is determined by, and varies with, the central metal ion involved. In the case of bis(2-thiophenyl)-ethylenediamine, both copper (II) and nickel(II) catalyze the hydrolytic decomposition via complex formation. The nickel (I I) is the more effective catalyst from the viewpoint of the actual rate constants. However, it requires an activation energy cf 12.5 kcal., while the corresponding reaction in the copper(II) case requires only 11.3 kcal. The values for the entropies of activation were found to be —30.0 e.u. for the nickel(II) system and — 34.7 e.u. for the copper(II) system. Studies of the rate of formation of the Schiff bases and their metal complexes (25) showed that prior coordination of one of the reactants slowed down the rate of formation of the Schiff base when the other reactant was added. Although copper (more than nickel) favored the production of the Schiff bases from the viewpoint of the thermodynamics of the overall reaction, the formation reactions were slower with copper than with nickel. The rate of hydrolysis of Schiff bases with or/Zw-aminophenols is so fast that the corresponding metal complexes cannot be isolated from solutions containing water (4). 

---