Catalyst particle size mass transport effect

As pointed out earlier, the major external resistance is that of mass transfer, and therefore, the effect of external heat transfer can be neglected. Furthermore, internal (intraparticle) transport effects can be neglected in slurry reactors except under some unusual reaction conditions since the size of the catalyst particles is of the order of 100 microns. In trickle-beds, however, both the internal heat and mass transport effects can be important. 

The mass transport influence is easy to diagnose experimentally. One measures the rate at various values of the Thiele modulus the modulus is easily changed by variation of R, the particle size. Cmshing and sieving the particles provide catalyst samples for the experiments. If the rate is independent of the particle size, the effectiveness factor is unity for all of them. If the rate is inversely proportional to particle size, the effectiveness factor is less than unity and

experimental points allow triangulation on the curve of Figure 10 and estimation of Tj and ( ). It is also possible to estimate the effective diffusion coefficient and thereby to estimate Tj and ( ) from a single measurement of the rate (48). 

Inspection of Fig. 15.3 reveals that while for jo 0.1 nAcm , the effectiveness factor is expected to be close to 1, for a faster reaction with Jo 1 p,A cm , it will drop to about 0.2. This is the case of internal diffusion limitation, well known in heterogeneous catalysis, when the reagent concentration at the outer surface of the catalyst grains is equal to its volume concentration, but drops sharply inside the pores of the catalyst. In this context, it should be pointed out that when the pore size is decreased below about 50 nm, the predominant mechanism of mass transport is Knudsen diffusion [Malek and Coppens, 2003], with the diffusion coefficient being less than the Pick diffusion coefficient and dependent on the porosity and pore stmcture. Moreover, the discrete distribution of the catalytic particles in the CL may also affect the measured current owing to overlap of diffusion zones around closely positioned particles [Antoine et ah, 1998]. 

Summing up this section, we would like to note that understanding size effects in electrocatalysis requires the application of appropriate model systems that on the one hand represent the intrinsic properties of supported metal nanoparticles, such as small size and interaction with their support, and on the other allow straightforward separation between kinetic, ohmic, and mass transport (internal and external) losses and control of readsorption effects. This requirement is met, for example, by metal particles and nanoparticle arrays on flat nonporous supports. Their investigation allows unambiguous access to reaction kinetics and control of catalyst structure. However, in order to understand how catalysts will behave in the fuel cell environment, these studies must be complemented with GDE and MEA tests to account for the presence of aqueous electrolyte in model experiments. 

For a more detailed analysis of measured transport restrictions and reaction kinetics, a more complex reactor simulation tool developed at Haldor Topsoe was used. The model used for sulphuric acid catalyst assumes plug flow and integrates differential mass and heat balances through the reactor length [16], The bulk effectiveness factor for the catalyst pellets is determined by solution of differential equations for catalytic reaction coupled with mass and heat transport through the porous catalyst pellet and with a film model for external transport restrictions. The model was used both for optimization of particle size and development of intrinsic rate expressions. Even more complex models including radial profiles or dynamic terms may also be used when appropriate. 

In many laboratory experiments with powder catalysts, with a relatively small particle size, the pore diffusion is usually dominant. The presence or absence of this effect can be determined with the Thiele modulus, cf. Equation (20). Generally, experiments are done with the same amount of catalyst, but different particle size. If r is independent of the particle size, then mass transport limitations are excluded, indicated by being smaller than 1 ... 

The described treatment of mass transport presumes a simple, relatively uniform (monomodal) pore size distribution. As previously mentioned, many catalyst particles are formed by tableting or extruding finely powdered microporous materials and have a bidisperse porous structure. Mass transport in such catalysts is usually described in terms of two coefficients, a effective macropore diffusivity and an effective micropore diffusivity. 

For the particle sizes used in industrial reactors (> 1.5 mm), intraparticle transport of the reactants and ammonia to and from the active inner catalyst surface may be slower than the intrinsic reaction rate and therefore cannot be neglected. The overall reaction can in this way be considerably limited by ammonia diffusion through the pores within the catalysts [211]. The ratio of the actual reaction rate to the intrinsic reaction rate (absence of mass transport restriction) has been termed as pore effectiveness factor E. This is often used as a correction factor for the rate equation constants in the engineering design of ammonia converters. 

While the above criteria are useful for diagnosing the effects of transport limitations on reaction rates of heterogeneous catalytic reactions, they require knowledge of many physical characteristics of the reacting system. Experimental properties like effective diffusivity in catalyst pores, heat and mass transfer coefficients at the fluid-particle interface, and the thermal conductivity of the catalyst are needed to utilize Equations (6.5.1) through (6.5.5). However, it is difficult to obtain accurate values of those critical parameters. For example, the diffusional characteristics of a catalyst may vary throughout a pellet because of the compression procedures used to form the final catalyst pellets. The accuracy of the heat transfer coefficient obtained from known correlations is also questionable because of the low flow rates and small particle sizes typically used in laboratory packed bed reactors. 

Another characteristic of the fluidized bed is the small size and density of catalyst particles necessary to maintain proper fluidization. The particles provide a much larger external surface per unit mass of catalyst than those, in a fixed-bed unit. This results in a higher rate of reaction (per unit mass) for a nonporous catalyst. Also, internal transport effects are negligible. 

---