Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Cascade impactors aerosol particles

It must also be emphasized that the major mass of a heterodispersed aerosol may be contained in a few relatively large particles, since the mass of a particle is proportional to the cube of its diameter. Therefore, the particle-size distribution and the concentration of the drug particles in the exposure atmosphere should be sampled using a cascade impactor or membrane filter sampling technique, monitored using an optical or laser particle-size analyzer, and analyzed using optical or electron microscopy techniques. [Pg.356]

The aerosol produced by a laboratory pulverized coal combustor was size classified in the range 0.03 to 4 ym Stokes equivalent diameter using a low-pressure cascade impactor. The samples thus collected were analyzed using a focussed beam particle induced X-ray emission technique. This combination of techniques was shown to be capable of resolving much of the structure of the submicron coal ash aerosol. Two distinct modes in the mass distribution were observed. The break between these modes was at a particle size of about 0.1... [Pg.169]

Improved control devices now frequently installed on conventional coal-utility boilers drastically affect the quantity, chemical composition, and physical characteristics of fine-particles emitted to the atmosphere from these sources. We recently sampled fly-ash aerosols upstream and downstream from a modern lime-slurry, spray-tower system installed on a 430-Mw(e) coal utility boiler. Particulate samples were collected in situ on membrane filters and in University of Washington MKIII and MKV cascade impactors. The MKV impactor, operated at reduced pressure and with a cyclone preseparator, provided 13 discrete particle-size fractions with median diameters ranging from 0,07 to 20 pm with up to 6 of the fractions in the highly respirable submicron particle range. The concentrations of up to 35 elements and estimates of the size distributions of particles in each of the fly-ash fractions were determined by instrumental neutron activation analysis and by electron microscopy, respectively. Mechanisms of fine-particle formation and chemical enrichment in the flue-gas desulfurization system are discussed. [Pg.173]

The average particle size distributions for four predominantly crustal elements, Al, Si, Ca, and Ti, are shown in Figure 3. They are essentially identical. It should be pointed out that the downturn of the relative concentrations above 8 ymad (impactor stage 6) is the combined result of the actual distribution of particle sizes in the atmosphere and the efficiency with which these very coarse particles can enter (upward) into the cascade impactor. This efficiency must decrease with increasing particle size and generally depend on inlet design and wind speed. Nevertheless, it is important to note here that the patterns of the four elements are similar, implying a common aerosol source. [Pg.294]

Van Vaeck, L K. Van Cauwenberghe, and J. Janssens, The Gas-Particle Distribution of Organic Aerosol Constituents Measurement of the Volatilization Artifact in Hi-Vol Cascade Impactor Sampling, Atmos. Environ., 18, 417-430 (1984). [Pg.544]

In an attempt to increase the amount of particles retained in the lungs, large porous particles with low density (p < 0.1 g/cm2) have been designed (Edwards et al. 1997). The particles were composed of 50% lactide and 50% glycolide. Porous and nonporous particles loaded with testosterone were aerosolized into a cascade impactor system from a dry powder inhaler (DPI) and the respirable fraction was measured. Nonporous particles (d = 3.5 pm, p = 0.8 g/cm3) exhibited a respirable fraction of 20.5 3.5%, whereas 50 + 10% of porous particles (d = 8.5 pm, p = 0.1 g/cm3) were respirable, even though the aerodynamic diameter of the two particle types were nearly identical. Porous particles as a consequence of their large size and low mass density can... [Pg.268]

Particle Number Concentration and Size Distribution. The development of aerosol science to its present state has been directly tied to the available instrumentation. The introduction of the Aitken condensation nuclei counter in the late 1800s marks the beginning of aerosol science by the ability to measure number concentrations (4). Theoretical descriptions of the change in the number concentration by coagulation quickly followed. Particle size distribution measurements became possible when the cascade impactor was developed, and its development allowed the validation of predictions that could not previously be tested. The cascade impactor was originally introduced by May (5, 6), and a wide variety of impactors have since been used. Operated at atmospheric pressure and with jets fabricated by conventional machining, most impactors can only classify particles larger... [Pg.199]

Chemical Composition Aerosol composition measurements have most frequently been made with little or no size resolution, most often by analysis of filter samples of the aggregate aerosol. Sample fractionation into coarse and fine fractions is achieved with a variety of dichotomous samplers. These instruments spread the collected sample over a relatively large area on a filter that can be analyzed directly or after extraction Time resolution is determined by the sample flow rate and the detection limits of the analytical techniques, but sampling times less than 1 h are rarely used even when the analytical techniques would permit them. These longer times are the result of experiment design rather than feasibility. Measurements of the distribution of chemical composition with respect to particle size have, until recently, been limited to particles larger than a few tenths of a micrometer in diameter and relatively low time resolution. One of the primary tools for composition-size distribution measurements is the cascade impactor. [Pg.204]

The fact that fine atmospheric particles are enriched in a number of toxic trace species has been known since the early 1970s. Natusch and Wallace (20, 21) observed that the fine particles emitted by a variety of high-temperature combustion sources follow similar trends of enrichment with decreasing particle size as observed in the atmosphere, and they hypothesized that volatilization and condensation of the trace species was responsible for much of the enrichment. Subsequent studies of a number of high-temperature sources and fundamental studies of fine-particle formation in high-temperature systems have substantiated their conclusions. The principal instruments used in those studies were cascade impactors, which fractionate aerosol samples according to the aerodynamic size of the particles. A variety... [Pg.204]

Particle Size Analysis Many particle-size-analysis methods suitable for dry-dust measurement are unsuitable for liquids because of coalescence and drainage after collection. Measurement of particle sizes in the flowing aerosol stream by using a cascade impactor is one... [Pg.112]

Cascade Impactors in the Chemical and Physical Characterization of Coal-Combustion Aerosol Particles... [Pg.313]

FIGURE 17.4. Differential particle size distrihution of B(a)P carhon black aerosol (100 pg/m ). Subsequent to exposure, substrate post-weights were recorded and entered into the Win-CIDRS (Windows-Cascade Impactor Data Reduction Program) to generate the particle size distribution for the particulate aerosol. From Hood et al. (2000). [Pg.233]

Figure 10 Size-dependent composition of aerosol particles for several sites in the vicinity of Los Angeles, California over several days in September and October 1996. Particles were sampled with a cascade impactor preceded by a cyclone separator with a cut size of 1.8 xm aerodynamic diameter (Hughes et aL, 1999), (reproduced by permission of American Chemical Society from Environ. ScL Technol. 1999, 33, 3506-3515). Figure 10 Size-dependent composition of aerosol particles for several sites in the vicinity of Los Angeles, California over several days in September and October 1996. Particles were sampled with a cascade impactor preceded by a cyclone separator with a cut size of 1.8 xm aerodynamic diameter (Hughes et aL, 1999), (reproduced by permission of American Chemical Society from Environ. ScL Technol. 1999, 33, 3506-3515).
Quantitatively, the appropriateness of particles for pulmonary delivery is assessed by the aerodynamic diameter, a term developed by aerosol physicists which takes into account size, shape, and density, and is typically determined by an inertial sampling device such as a cascade impactor. The aerodynamic diameter, >aer (pm), for particlcs greater than 500 nm can be approximated by ... [Pg.2568]


See other pages where Cascade impactors aerosol particles is mentioned: [Pg.20]    [Pg.384]    [Pg.1428]    [Pg.914]    [Pg.922]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.448]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.292]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.219]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.488]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.313]    [Pg.313]    [Pg.321]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.384]    [Pg.1251]    [Pg.1404]    [Pg.2087]    [Pg.2283]    [Pg.2582]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.309 ]




SEARCH



Aerosol particles

Cascade impactor

Impactors

© 2024 chempedia.info