Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Carbon dioxide, reduction rates

Both CO and C02 are reduced by eh. The immediate product of the first reaction is CO-, which reacts with water, giving OH and the formyl radical the latter has been identified by pulse radiolysis. The product of carbon dioxide reduction, C02-, is stable in the condensed phase with an absorption at 260 nm. It reacts with various organic radicals in addition reactions, giving carboxylates with rates that are competitive with ion-ion or radical-radical combination rates. [Pg.183]

The reduction of carbon monoxide also suffers deactivation by a surface species similar to that for carbon dioxide reduction but which forms at lower temperatures. The reduction of carbon monoxide does appear to proceed via a path similar to that which the reduction of carbon dioxide follows. Rates for methanol reduction are extremely variable. Methanol reduction, like carbon dioxide reduction, both increases in rate with decreasing pH until the surface becomes blocked with surface hydrogen and is also deactivated by increased temperature. For methanol, deactivation does not occur by the formation of the same surface species. [Pg.518]

Methanol Reduction at Ruthenium. The reduction of methanol to methane does occur as shown by the data in Table III. The data for each electrode are presented in the order that they were collected. Rates can be higher for methanol reduction compared to carbon dioxide reduction though faradaic efficiencies are lower. Unlike carbon dioxide reduction, the rate of methane formation is extremely... [Pg.522]

Carbon Dioxide Concentration on the Rate of Carbon Dioxide Reduction by Molecular Hydrogen, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (1943) 29, 184. [Pg.32]

Electrocatalysis at metal electrodes in aqueous (1.2) and non-aqueous ( ) solvents, phthalocyanine ( ) and ruthenium ( ) coated carbon, n-type semiconductors (6.7.8),and photocathodes (9,10) have been explored in an effort to develop effective catalysts for the synthesis of reduced products from carbon dioxide. The electrocatalytic and photocatalytic approaches have high faradaic efficiency of carbon dioxide reduction (1,6). but very low current densities. Hence the rate of product formation is low. Increasing current densities to provide meaningful amounts of product, substantially reduces carbon dioxide reduction in favor of hydrogen evolution. This reduction in current efficiency is a difficult problem to surmount in light of the probable electrostatic repulsion of carbon dioxide, or the aqueous bicarbonate ion, from a negatively charged cathode (11,12). [Pg.147]

Current developments in carbon dioxide reduction research is not enough for the real implementation of the process. The maximum yield has been reached up to some micromoles. Let s look at the present scenario, with the current pace, 1.1 x 108 kg of TiC>2 would be required for the production of methanol from carbon dioxide and water, assuming a catalyst activity of 1 pm ol product gcat 1 h"1 and production rate 1kg s"1 [19]. [Pg.4]

Significant differences in net photosynthetic assimilation of carbon dioxide are apparent between C, C, and CAM biomass species. One of the principal reasons for the generally lower yields of C biomass is its higher rate of photorespiration if the photorespiration rate could be reduced, the net yield of biomass would increase. Considerable research is in progress (ca 1992) to achieve this rate reduction by chemical and genetic methods, but as yet, only limited yield improvements have been made. Such an achievement with C biomass would be expected to be very beneficial for foodstuff production and biomass energy appHcations. [Pg.29]

Diethanolamine (DEA) has replaced MEA as the most widely used amine solvent. High load DEA technologies, such as that developed by Elf Aquitaine, permit the use of high (up to 40 wt % DEA) concentration solutions. The Elf Aquitaine—DEA process allows lower cinculation rates, and has consequent reductions ia capital and utility expenses. DEA tends to be more resistant to degradation by carbonyl sulfide and carbon disulfide than MEA. DEA is, however, susceptible to degradation by carbon dioxide. [Pg.211]

The flame ionization detector Is the most popular of the flame-based detectors. Apart from a reduction in sensitivity compared to expectations based on gas chromatographic response factors [138] and incompatibility with the high flow rates of conventional bore columns (4-5 mm I. 0.), the flame ionization detector is every bit as easy to use in SFC as it is in gas chromatography [148,149]. It shows virtually no response to carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide and sulfur hexafluoride mobile phases but is generally incompatible with other mobile phases and mixed mobile phases containing organic modifiers except for water and formic acid, other gas chromatographic detectors that have been used in SFC include the thermionic ionization detector (148,150], ... [Pg.837]

Hydrogen transfer reactions are highly selective and usually no side products are formed. However, a major problem is that such reactions are in redox equilibrium and high TOFs can often only be reached when the equilibria involved are shifted towards the product side. As stated above, this can be achieved by adding an excess of the hydrogen donor. (For a comparison, see Table 20.2, entry 8 and Table 20.7, entry 3, in which a 10-fold increase in TOF, from 6 to 60, can be observed for the reaction catalyzed by neodymium isopropoxide upon changing the amount of hydrogen donor from an equimolar amount to a solvent. Removal of the oxidation product by distillation also increases the reaction rate. When formic acid (49) is employed, the reduction is a truly irreversible reaction [82]. This acid is mainly used for the reduction of C-C double bonds. As the proton and the hydride are removed from the acid, carbon dioxide is formed, which leaves the reaction mixture. Typically, the reaction is performed in an azeotropic mixture of formic acid and triethylamine in the molar ratio 5 2 [83],... [Pg.600]


See other pages where Carbon dioxide, reduction rates is mentioned: [Pg.518]    [Pg.520]    [Pg.524]    [Pg.525]    [Pg.527]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.480]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.597]    [Pg.246]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.269]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.503]    [Pg.269]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.1301]    [Pg.500]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.519]    [Pg.410]    [Pg.522]    [Pg.1913]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.519]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.11 ]




SEARCH



Carbon dioxide reduction

Carbon reduction

Carbonates reduction

Reduction rates

© 2024 chempedia.info