Cantilever beam flexural test

Double cantilever beam flexure test (tension)... 

Another method of flexural testing that can be used is, for example, the cantilever beam method (Fig. 2-18), which is used to relate different beam designs. It provides an exam-... 

A good applications-oriented measure of the use temperature for a ma-teral is the heat distortion or heat deflection test (HDT). The HDT is described by ASTM-D648 as the temperature at which a sample of defined dimensions (5 X Vi X Vs (or Va) in.) deflects under a flexural load of 66 or 264 psi placed at its center. In case of a largely amorphous polymer, the HDT temperature is typically slightly (10 to 20 °C) lower than the Tg as determined by DSC or DTA, whereas with more-crystalline polymers, it more closely correlates with the Tm. The HDT temperature is a useful indicator of the temperature limits for structural (load-supporting) applications. A loaded cantilever beam is used in another heat deflection test called the Martens method. 

The cantilever beam is another flexural test that is used to evaluate different plastics (RPs, etc.) and structures such as beam designs. It is used in creep and fatigue testing and for conducting testing in different environments where the cantilever test specimen under load is exposed to chemicals, moisture, etc. 

Flexural modulus (flex modulus) n. The ratio, within the elastic limit, of the applied stress in the outermost fibers of a test specimen in three-point, static flexure, to the calculated strain in those outermost fibers, according to ASTM test D 790 or D 790M. For a given material and similar specimen dimensions and manufacture, the modulus values obtained will usually be a little higher than those found in a tensile test such as D 638, and may differ, too, from the moduli found in the cantilever-beam test, D 747. 

D5418-01 Test method for plastics dynamic mechanical properties, in flexural dual cantilever beam ... 

ASTM D5418-01, Standard Test Method for Plastics Dynamic Mechanical Properties In Flexural Dual Cantilever Beam ... 

Tensile impact is not usually applied to composites. In flexural impact tests, the specimen can be freely supported and loaded centrally (Charpy) or it can take the form of a cantilever beam (Izod) and, in both cases, the impact is by a pendulum. Specimens can be tested either notched or unnotched. 

Cantilever-Beam Stiffness n A method of determining stiffness of plastics by measuring the force and angle of bend of a cantilever beam made of the specimen material. The ASTM test is D 747. See also Flexural Modulus. 

Energy per unit thickness required to break a test specimen under flexural impact Test specimen is held as a vertical cantilevered beam and is impacted by a swinging pendulum. The energy lost by the pendulum is equated with the energy absorbed by the test specimen. Specimen is held as a vertical cantilevered beam and is broken by a pendulum. Impact occurs on the notched side of the specimen. ASTM D256 and ISO 180 contain details of testing. 

The flexural testing of polyethylene can be performed in a two-, three-, or four-point bending mode, the configurations of which are illustrated schematically in Figure 29. Three-point bending produces a line of maximum stress directly beneath the central beam, whereas the four-point mode results in maximum stress in the region between the two central beams. The three- and four-point modes, described in ASTM Method D 790, are typically used for stiffer samples, while the two-point (cantilever beam) method, described in ASTM Method D 747, is used for more flexible ones. 

When the system is subjected to the combined loadings, the Gic, Guc, Gmc, and Gi, Gii, Gill the critical energy release rates and energy release rates in mode 1,11 and 111, respectively. The values of Gic, Guc, and Gmc for the interlaminar level of composite material were taken from Liao and Sun (1996), where the values were determined experimentally by implementing a new analytical series solution for AS4 (3501-6 C/E). In the case of steel—composite interface, the values were obtained from Andre and Linghoff (2009), in which the Gic, Guc, and Gmc were determined experimentally via double-cantilever beam and end-notch flexure tests. The corresponding values are listed in Table 9.3. 

---