Flexural beam test

Four-point flexure beam test configuration... 

Assuming that deformation can be adequately described by means of elementary beam theory, derive the expression for energy release rate for the four-point flexure beam test configuration given in (4.54). 

Standard methods use rectangular beam test pieces. The geometry of the beam is chosen to make shear stresses and flexure across the width unimportant. For three-point loading a span-to-depth ratio of 16 is generally satisfactory but does vary with the material characteristics. The quite different situation of deliberately introducing shear forces to measure interlaminar strength was discussed in Section 5. 

Fracture toughness tests for isotropic materials normally use edge-notched flexure beams and compact tension specimens. These methods are. as for the impact tests, only suitable for the injected or compression molded materials, which do not have a strongly laminated structure. Laminated composite materials have their primary failure path between the layers, and a new set of test geometries has been developed. 

Table Yin. Results of Flexural Fatigue Tests of Welded Beams ...

With regard to American practice, fatigue test is performed according to ASTM D 7460 (2010) or AASHTO T 321 (2011). The standard specifies one procedure/test method, the four-point flexural bending test on prismatic (beam) specimens. 

Parry TV, Wronski AS, Kinking and tensile compressive and interlaminar shear failure mechanisms in cfrp beams tested in flexure, J Mater Sci, 16,439-450, 1081. 

Under three point bend loading of a composite (beam), cracks may be developed due to tensile stresses at the lower stratus of the specimen as well as compression stresses at the upper one, or due to interlaminar shear. The type of failure depends on the ratio of span to depth (L/D). Short beam specimens usually fail in shear and long ones by tensile or compression stresses. For interlaminar shear strength (ILSS) tests, a L/D = 5 was chosen (ASTM-D-2344-76). In case of flexural strength tests, this ratio was fixed to 40 (DIN 29971). 

Flexural modulus (flex modulus) n. The ratio, within the elastic limit, of the applied stress in the outermost fibers of a test specimen in three-point, static flexure, to the calculated strain in those outermost fibers, according to ASTM test D 790 or D 790M. For a given material and similar specimen dimensions and manufacture, the modulus values obtained will usually be a little higher than those found in a tensile test such as D 638, and may differ, too, from the moduli found in the cantilever-beam test, D 747. 

Tensile impact is not usually applied to composites. In flexural impact tests, the specimen can be freely supported and loaded centrally (Charpy) or it can take the form of a cantilever beam (Izod) and, in both cases, the impact is by a pendulum. Specimens can be tested either notched or unnotched. 

FLEXURAL MODULUS The ratio, within the elastic limit, of stress to corresponding strain. It is calculated by drawing a tangent to the steepest initial straight-hne portion of the load deformation curve and using the equation EB = L3ml4bd3y where EB is the modulus, L is the span (in inches), m is the slope of the tangent, b is the width of beam tested, and d is the depth of the beam. 

Energy per unit thickness required to break a test specimen under flexural impact Test specimen is held as a vertical cantilevered beam and is impacted by a swinging pendulum. The energy lost by the pendulum is equated with the energy absorbed by the test specimen. Specimen is held as a vertical cantilevered beam and is broken by a pendulum. Impact occurs on the notched side of the specimen. ASTM D256 and ISO 180 contain details of testing. 

Another method of flexural testing that can be used is, for example, the cantilever beam method (Fig. 2-18), which is used to relate different beam designs. It provides an exam-... 

The flexural strength of the annealed polymers proved to be consistently about 30% higher than the strength of the quenched polymers as shown in Fig. 6.1. Tests were evaluated in accordance with ISO 178 [54]. As the samples yielded, they deformed plastically. Therefore, the assumptions of the simple beam theory were no longer justified and consequently the yield strength was overestimated. 

Flexural strength is determined using beam-shaped specimens that are supported longways between two rollers. The load is then applied by either one or two rollers. These variants are called the three-point bend test and the four-point bend test, respectively. The stresses set up in the beam are complex and include compressive, shear and tensile forces. However, at the convex surface of the beam, where maximum tension exists, the material is in a state of pure tension (Berenbaum Brodie, 1959). The disadvantage of the method appears to be one of sensitivity to the condition of the surface, which is not surprising since the maximum tensile forces occur in the convex surface layer. 

We perform flexural testing on polymer rods or beams in the same basic apparatus that we use for tensile or compressive testing. Figure 8.6 illustrates two of the most common flexural testing configurations. In two-point bending, shown in Fig. 8,6 a), we clamp the sample by one end and apply a flexural load to the other. In three-point bending, shown in Fig. 8.6 b), we place the sample across two parallel supports and apply a flexural load to its center. 

We use a variant of flexural testing to measure a sample s heat distortion temperature. In this test, we place the sample in a three point bending fixture, as shown in Fig. 8.6 b), and apply a load sufficient to generate a standard stress within it. We then ramp the temperature of the sample at a fixed rate and note the temperature at which the beam deflects by a specified amount. This test is very useful when selecting polymers for engineering applications that are used under severe conditions, such as under the hoods of automobiles or as gears in many small appliances or inside power tools where heat tends to accumulate. 

Young s modulus is often measured by a flexural test. In one such test a beam of rectangullar cross section supported at two points separated by ia distance Lq is loaded at the midpoint by a force F, as illustrated in Figure 1.2. The resulting central deflection V is measured and the Young s modulus E is calculated as follows ... 

---