Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Calculator sequential operations with

From a point of view of industrial protein production the number of sequential operations necessary to achieve the desired purity of a protein contributes significantly to the overall costs of the downstream process. This is on one hand due to the capital investment and amount of consumables needed for each step as well as to the individual time requirements of each operation, as labour costs are a very important factor in the calculation of process economics. Secondly the overall yield of the purification is reduced with each additional process step, originating from its inherent loss of product. Furthermore, fast primary recovery should separate the protein of interest from process conditions detrimental to its structural stability, e.g. proteases, glycosidases, or oxidizing conditions. As the performance of the purification process, expressed by its overall yield, operation time, and capital cost may contribute to up to 80% of the total production costs [2], it is evident, that a reduction of the number of sequential steps in a purification protocol may be the key to the economic success of a potential protein product [3],... [Pg.188]

In a sequential-modular program, the executive program sets up the flowsheet sequence, identifies the recycle loops, and controls the unit operation calculations, while interacting with the unit operations library, physical property data bank, and the other subroutines. The executive program also contains procedures for the optimum ordering of the calculations and routines to promote convergence. [Pg.165]

The older modular simulation mode, on the other hand, is more common in commerical applications. Here process equations are organized within their particular unit operation. Solution methods that apply to a particular unit operation solve the unit model and pass the resulting stream information to the next unit. Thus, the unit operation represents a procedure or module in the overall flowsheet calculation. These calculations continue from unit to unit, with recycle streams in the process updated and converged with new unit information. Consequently, the flow of information in the simulation systems is often analogous to the flow of material in the actual process. Unlike equation-oriented simulators, modular simulators solve smaller sets of equations, and the solution procedure can be tailored for the particular unit operation. However, because the equations are embedded within procedures, it becomes difficult to provide problem specifications where the information flow does not parallel that of the flowsheet. The earliest modular simulators (the sequential modular type) accommodated these specifications, as well as complex recycle loops, through inefficient iterative procedures. The more recent simultaneous modular simulators now have efficient convergence capabilities for handling multiple recycles and nonconventional problem specifications in a coordinated manner. [Pg.208]

Easterby proposed a generalized theory of the transition time for sequential enzyme reactions where the steady-state production of product is preceded by a lag period or transition time during which the intermediates of the sequence are accumulating. He found that if a steady state is eventually reached, the magnitude of this lag may be calculated, even when the differentiation equations describing the process have no analytical solution. The calculation may be made for simple systems in which the enzymes obey Michaehs-Menten kinetics or for more complex pathways in which intermediates act as modifiers of the enzymes. The transition time associated with each intermediate in the sequence is given by the ratio of the appropriate steady-state intermediate concentration to the steady-state flux. The theory is also applicable to the transition between steady states produced by flux changes. Apphcation of the theory to coupled enzyme assays makes it possible to define the minimum requirements for successful operation of a coupled assay. The theory can be extended to deal with sequences in which the enzyme concentration exceeds substrate concentration. [Pg.174]

Sequential optimisation methods are used for multi-parameter optimisation. The simplex method starts with some initial experiments, evaluates from them the values of a sum optimisation criterion (COF), on the basis of these results determines the next combination of operation parameters to be used for running a new chromatographic experiment and compares the value of the COF obtained from the new experiment with the old one. On the basis of this prediction, a new combination of the operation parameters is calculated which is expected to yield an improved value of the COF, the separation is run at these new conditions and the procedure is repeated until maximum COF with no further improvement is eventually obtained, for which — hopefully — the optimum combination of operation parameters has been obtained (Fig. 1.22). Any combination of operation parameters can be optimised in this way and no knowledge about the nature of the chromatographic process is necessary ( black-box philosophy). Some HPLC control systems allow the simplex optimisation to run unattended. [Pg.62]

Somewhat less information is available for the complex between stilbene and Ne. However, it is interesting that appearance of the stilbene product after excitation of the V25 state at 198 cm" 1, can only be fitted by assuming a 233-psec rising component and a 63-psec decaying component. This is rather convincing evidence that the sequential mechanism 2 is operative. The slow IVR = 1/(255 psec)] is followed by a faster dissociation rate 1/(65 psec)], which agrees well with an RRKM calculation (Semmes et al., 1990). [Pg.381]

Once the sample is accepted at the laboratory, an internal chain of custody begins, controlled by a Laboratory Information Management (LIM) system that may be manual or computerized. A unique sequential identification (ID) number is assigned to the sample and affixed to its containers as they move through the laboratory. The ID is recorded by the sample preparer, the analyst, and the radiation detector operator, and is associated with all records of chemical yield, counting data, calculations, and reported values. [Pg.227]


See other pages where Calculator sequential operations with is mentioned: [Pg.204]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.347]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.283]    [Pg.596]    [Pg.301]    [Pg.333]    [Pg.292]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.251]    [Pg.522]    [Pg.405]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.430]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.345]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.757]    [Pg.328]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.2879]    [Pg.295]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.292]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.20 ]




SEARCH



Calculators operations with

© 2024 chempedia.info