Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Calcium rejection

While as a general trend, the organic rejection decreases with calcium rejection (Figure 6.9), the effect observed is relatively small. A more detailed assessment of filtration of organics in the presence of calcium is given in section 6.6. [Pg.170]

As can be seen in Figure 6.11, calcium rejection is about 15% for the IkDa membrane. Rejection decreases with the increasing MWCO of the membranes. IHSS FA and Aldrich 100 kDa samples seem to show an increased cation rejection. [Pg.171]

Table 6.3 Calcium rejection by the UF membranes in the absence of organics (20 mM NaCl, 1 mM NaHCO, 0.5 mM CaCL,pH 8). Table 6.3 Calcium rejection by the UF membranes in the absence of organics (20 mM NaCl, 1 mM NaHCO, 0.5 mM CaCL,pH 8).
The TFC-S membrane shows a similar calcium rejection to the TFC-ULP membrane, but a significantly lower sodium rejection, which is more typical of NF. The TFC-S membrane shows a relatively stable performance over the pH range. However, neither membrane shows a pH effect, indicating that the ions are mostly retained due to their size. Sodium and calcium ions occur mostly in their dissociated form up to a pH of 10. [Pg.226]

Both membranes show a general trend of a decrease in rejection with increased NaCl concentration for both ions, although a stable calcium rejection is reached for calcium rejection of the TFC-SR membrane in the presence of NaCl (see Figure 7.12). [Pg.227]

The cation rejection depends strongly on the electrolyte concentration. The calcium rejection increases with calcium concentration and in the presence of 20 mM NaCl. Sodium rejection also increases with concentration, but decreases in the presence of calcium, even reaching negative rejections when the calcium concentration increases to 2.5 mM. Macoun (1998) attributes negative rejection to a faster permeation of ions than water under certain conditions of enhanced driving force, and Hagmeyer (1999) states that the multivalent ion may pump the monovalent ion across the membrane. The final flux depends on the electrolyte concentration. Calcium is more effective in reducing flux than sodium chloride. [Pg.229]

Membrane DOC Rejection [%] UV 254nm Rejection [%] Calcium Rejection [%] Sodium Rejection [%] J/J VO Final [-]... [Pg.230]

Calcium rejection is highest at low pH, where the membranes are positively charged and the calcium is fully dissociated. Sodium rejection is consistently lower at pH 8 and this confirms the results in Table 7.8. [Pg.231]

The increase of FA concentration causes a moderate increase in DOC and UV rejection, as well as calcium rejection (Table 7.14). [Pg.231]

In conclusion for the rejection experiments, the TFC-SR membrane promises best performance in water treatment with a stable flux, and low sodium and high calcium rejection. The organic rejection of this membrane is the highest overall. [Pg.237]

The rejection shows significant variations depending on the FeClj dosage. At 25 mgL FeCF, when floes are relatively neutral and large, the DOC rejection is about 70%, UV rejection is complete (due to the UV absorbing characteristics of the fully retained iron), calcium rejection varies from 40 to 60%, and sodium rejection is zero. In the case of 100 mgL FeCl.i, when the floes are small and positively charged, DOC rejection drops to about 45%, UV rejection is complete, calcium rejection increased to >90%, and sodium rejection increased to about 30%. [Pg.265]

The total score for each parameter suite (colloids, DOC, and ions) is 100. The columns are subdivided into equal fractions, resulting in total points of 25 for the individual colloid fraction, for the organic fraction, and 50 for the major cations (Na+, Car ). For colloids stable primary colloids (OPS system) are assumed as these appear most abundant in a natural water. Ion rejection is represented by sodium and calcium rejection in the absence of organics and DOC rejection of solutions containing 0.5 mM CaCb (except for MF where calcium concentration is 2.5 mM). As a sum criterion, the water quality parameter (WQP) is introduced. The maximum score for WQP is 300. [Pg.291]

Method 1. Arrange the flask containing the reaction mixture for steam distillation as in Fig. II, 40, 1. Proceed with the steam distillation until crystals of p-dibromobenzene appear in the condenser. Change the receiver and continue with the distillation until all the p-dibromobenzeiie has passed over from time to time run out the water from the condenser so that the crystals melt and run down into the receiver. Reject the residue in the flask. Transfer the first distillate to a separatory funnel, wash it with a httle water, and dry the lower layer with a little anhydrous magnesium sulphate or anhydrous calcium chloride filter. Distil slowly from a small distilling flask use a wire gauze or an air bath (Fig. II, 5, 3). Collect the fraction which passes over at 150-170° pour the residue (R), while it is still hot, into a small beaker or porcelain basin for the isolation of p-dibromobenzene. Redistil the fraction of b.p. 150-170° and collect the bromobenzene at 154-157° (3). The yield is 60 g. [Pg.536]

NOTE The calcium carbonate limit that RO system designers typically require is +1.6 to 1.8 LSI in the concentrate or reject water, and the calcium sulfate design limit typically calls for a maximum reject water saturation ratio of 1.6 to 1.8 times solubility product. [Pg.369]

An important point to note here and elsewhere in the description of cell activity is that the particular nature of calcium biochemistry, including the availability of the element and its necessary rejection from the prokaryote cell, when linked to stimulated input and interaction with specific internal proteins of selected properties, made it uniquely suitable for the function as an elementary ionic fast in/out messenger. It was then capable of signalling to cell changes once cell size and organisation increased beyond the elementary level of a cell with one small, rapidly... [Pg.304]

We must also observe that the rejection of Ca2+ and of other elements, like oxygen, to aid survival produced an energy store. Although, unlike oxygen, this store could not be used to drive metabolism, it is energised gradients, here of calcium, which are central to information transfer from the environment and then of fast action, independent of DNA. [Pg.305]

Equations Malic acid first reacts with CaC03 to yield the soluble calcium malate that goes into the filtrate, whereas the insoluble calcium carbonate is filtered off and rejected. Thus,... [Pg.129]

Physically, ion channels are tiny pores that stud the surface of all cells. The ion channels are important for, among other things, the function of muscles and the nervous system. These channels allow the passage of potassium, calcium, sodium, and chloride ions. Through a balance of electrical forces and chemical bonds, ion channels are specific for one ion for instance, a potassium ion channel will reject a sodium ion trying to enter its channel. An excellent visualization of the overall process is found at the website http //www. rockefeller.edu/pubinfo/howkion.html. It will be helpful to look at this website before going any further in the discussion. [Pg.204]

Tests were also run with simulated brackish agricultural drainage water, as illustrated in Table 4. A feedwater composition containing sodium, calcium, chloride, sulfate, and bicarbonate ions was prepared in such a way as to duplicate the water in the Mohawk-Wellton drainage canal at Yuma, Arizona. Salt rejections were relatively poor toward this synthetic feedwater, but when this water was line-softened and acidified to pH 5.5 with sulfuric acid, salt rejection of the 90 10 copolyamide improved markedly. However, the membrane s water flux declined by nearly 50 percent. Salt rejection and flux were found in this and other examples to be markedly dependent on pH. As the pH approached the pKa of... [Pg.313]


See other pages where Calcium rejection is mentioned: [Pg.369]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.325]    [Pg.369]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.325]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.525]    [Pg.367]    [Pg.525]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.210]    [Pg.305]    [Pg.311]    [Pg.388]    [Pg.447]    [Pg.256]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.468]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.470]    [Pg.313]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.148]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.210 ]




SEARCH



Reject, rejects

Rejects

© 2024 chempedia.info