Bonding dispersion interaction

Each level of a hierarchy is defined by the constituting (non-homeomorphic) types of building blocks, and by relations between the types. In materials the relations include (but are not limited to) connectedness by primary covalent bonds, hydrogen bonds, dispersion interactions and interactions between phases such as adhesion forces. 

Supramolecular Chemistry The study of systems involving aggregates of molecules or ions held together by non-covalent interactions, such as electrostatic interactions, hydrogen bonding, dispersion interactions and solvophobic effects. 

FIGURE 2.16 Comparison of the experimental [92] excess molar enthalpies, H, at 298.15 K for the system X 2-ethoxyethanol + (1 - x) benzene, O, with the predictions of the NRHB model for the eontrihutions from intermolecular hydrogen bonds (—), dispersive interactions ( ), intramolecular hydrogen bonds (—), and the total (—). The contribution of dispersive interactions is compared with the experimental IF for the system... 

These equations imply that A132 will exceed A12 if A33 is larger than A13 + A23. This effect, termed lyophobic bonding, occurs if the solvent-surface interaction is weaker than that between the solvent molecules. More interestingly, the dispersion interaction will be repulsive (A 132 < 0) when An and/or A23 are sufficiently large. Israelachvili [1] tabulates a number of Am values Awhw Ahwh 0-4X 10 erg, Apwp 1 x 10" erg, and Aqwq = O.SX -IO erg, where W, H, P, and Q denote water, hydrocarbon, polystyrene and quartz respectively. 

Secondary Bonding. The atoms in a polymer molecule are held together by primary covalent bonds. Linear and branched chains are held together by secondary bonds hydrogen bonds, dipole interactions, and dispersion or van der Waal s forces. By copolymerization with minor amounts of acryhc (CH2=CHCOOH) or methacrylic acid followed by neutralization, ionic bonding can also be introduced between chains. Such polymers are known as ionomers (qv). 

Now, it is seen that polar groups dominate the molecular structure, resulting from hydroxyl groups from the two serine and threonine fragments in addition to the peptide bonds themselves. Only weak dispersive interactions will be contributed by glycine fragments (CH2 groups). 

Chemical secondary bonding. Low-energy bonds, dipolar interactions, dispersion may all play an important role in the development of interfacial adhesion. 

Where FCl is the solute gas-liquid partition coefficient, r is the tendency of the solvent to interact through k- and n-electron pairs (Lewis basicity), s the contribution from dipole-dipole and dipole-induced dipole interactions (in molecular solvents), a is the hydrogen bond basicity of the solvent, b is its hydrogen bond acidity and I is how well the solvent will separate members of a homologous series, with contributions from solvent cavity formation and dispersion interactions. 

To retain solutes selectively by dispersive interactions, the stationary phase must contain no polar or ionic substances, but only hydrocarbon-type materials such as the reverse-bonded phases, now so popular in LC. Reiterating the previous argument, to ensure that dispersive selectivity dominates in the stationary phase, and dispersive interactions in the mobile phase are minimized, the mobile phase must now be strongly polar. Hence the use of methanol-water and acetonitrile-water mixtures as mobile phases in reverse-phase chromatography systems. An example of the separation of some antimicrobial agents on Partisil ODS 3, particle diameter 5p is shown in figure 5. 

The basic polymer appears to be a hydroxylated polyether to which octadecyl chains have been bonded and so it behaves as a reverse phase exhibiting dispersive interactions with the solutes. An example of the separation of a series of peptides is shown in figure 15. The column was 3.5 cm long, 4.6 mm i.d. The solutes shown were (1) oc-endorphin, (2) bombesin, (3) y-endorphin, (4) angiotensin, (5) somatostatin and (6) calcitonon. The separation was carried out with a 10 min linear program from water containing 0.2% trifluoroacetic acid to 80% acetonitrile. 

This precipitation process can be carried out rather cleverly on the surface of a reverse phase. If the protein solution is brought into contact with a reversed phase, and the protein has dispersive groups that allow dispersive interactions with the bonded phase, a layer of protein will be adsorbed onto the surface. This is similar to the adsorption of a long chain alcohol on the surface of a reverse phase according to the Langmuir Adsorption Isotherm which has been discussed in an earlier chapter. Now the surface will be covered by a relatively small amount of protein. If, however, the salt concentration is now increased, then the protein already on the surface acts as deposition or seeding sites for the rest of the protein. Removal of the reverse phase will separate the protein from the bulk matrix and the original protein can be recovered from the reverse phase by a separate procedure. 

The separation was carried out on a bonded phase LC-PCN column carrying cyanopropylmethyl moieties on the surface. Thus, in contrast to the extraction process, which appears to be based on ionic interactions with the weak ion exchange material, the LC separation appears to be based on a mixture of interactions. There will be dispersive interactions of the drugs with the hydrocarbon chains of the bonded moiety and also weakly polar interactions with the cyano group. It is seen that the extraction procedures are very efficient and all the tricyclic antidepressant drugs are eluted discretely. 

The first example will be the separation of a ferredoxin mixture using a bonded phase that contains aromatic nuclei as well as aliphatic chains. The stationary phase will thus, exhibit polar interaction from induced dipoles if the aromatic ring comes into contact with a strong dipoles of the solute and, at the same time, exhibit dispersive interactions between the aliphatic chains and any dispersive centers of the solute molecule. An example of the separation obtained is shown in figure 16. 

These interactions are comparabie to and sometimes stronger than dipoiar and dispersion interactions, but they are oniy 5 to 10% as strong as covaient bonds. 

---