BIOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS OF THREE-PHASE FLUIDIZATION

This section of the current chapter goes beyond a simple listing of current three-phase biofluidization applications to consider the differences in conventional three-phase fluidization and biofluidization from the aspect of reactor design and operation. Past research into three-phase biofluidization has been summarized in several excellent reviews (Andrews, 1988 Fan, 1989 Heijnen et al., 1989 Schiigerl, 1989 Siegel and Robinson, 1992), and this chapter will concentrate on the main research themes and advances of the last few years. Though gas continuous three-phase fluidized bioreactors exist (Fan, 1989), we consider here only those bioreactors in which the liquid phase is the continuous phase. 

There are a wide variety of three-phase fluidized bioreactor designs possible. The conventional reactor, shown in Fig. 9, is fluidized by both gas and liquid entering at the bottom of the reactor and leaving at the top and is the most common type of three-phase fluidized bed bioreactor. This reactor may be configured to operate with little axial liquid mixing or in a well-mixed mode by adding a recycle stream. The airlift reactor or draft tube fluidized bed reactor, Fig. 10, is also frequently used. In this reactor, gas is injected at the bottom of a draft tube placed in the center of the 

Reactor geometry and distributor design Growth rate 

Particle properties (density, size, porosity, shape, wettability, size distribution) Biofilm properties (density, thickness, active fraction) 

Inlet and outlet substrate concentrations Biofilm erosion rate 

---

The 1980 s and the early 1990 s have seen the blossoming development of the biotechnology field. Three-phase fluidized bed bioreactors have become an essential element in the commercialization of processes to yield products and treat wastewater via biological mechanisms. Fluidized bed bioreactors have been applied in the areas of wastewater treatment, discussed previously, fermentation, and cell culture. The large scale application of three-phase fluidized bed or slurry bubble column fermen-tors are represented by ethanol production in a 10,000 liter fermentor (Samejima et al., 1984), penicillin production in a 200 liter fermentor (Endo et al., 1986), and the production of monoclonal antibodies in a 1,000 liter slurry bubble column bioreactor (Birch et al., 1985). Fan (1989) provides a complete review of biological applications of three-phase fluidized beds up to 1989. Part II of this chapter covers the recent developments in three-phase fluidized bed bioreactor technology. 

The most widespread biological application of three-phase fluidization at a commercial scale is in wastewater treatment. Several large scale applications exist for fermentation processes, as well, and, recently, applications in cell culture have been developed. Each of these areas have particular features that make three-phase fluidization particularly well-suited for them Wastewater Treatment. As can be seen in Tables 14a to 14d, numerous examples of the application of three-phase fluidization to waste-water treatment exist. Laboratory studies in the 1970 s were followed by large scale commercial units in the early 1980 s, with aerobic applications preceding anaerobic systems (Heijnen et al., 1989). The technique is well accepted as a viable tool for wastewater treatment for municipal sewage, food process waste streams, and other industrial effluents. Though pure cultures known to degrade a particular waste component are occasionally used (Sreekrishnan et al., 1991 Austermann-Haun et al., 1994 Lazarova et al., 1994), most applications use a mixed culture enriched from a similar waste stream or treatment facility or no inoculation at all (Sanz and Fdez-Polanco, 1990). 

---