Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Biocompatibility-structure

A. L. Elias, J. C. Carrero-Sanchez, H. Terrones, M. Endo, J. P. Laclette, M Terrones, Viability studies of pure carbon- and nitrogen-doped nanotubes with Entamoeba histolytica From amoebicidal to biocompatible structures, Small, vol. 3, pp. 1723-1729, 2007. [Pg.120]

Manso M., Herrero P., Fernandez M., Langlet M., Martinez-Duart J.M. Textured hydroxyapatite interface onto biomedical Ti based coatings. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2003 64 600-605 Manso M., Langlet M., Fernandez M., Vazquez L., Martinez-Duart J.M. Surface and interface analysis of hydroxyapatite/Ti02 biocompatible structures. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2003 23 451-453... [Pg.306]

The presence of polymer, solvent, and ionic components in conducting polymers reminds one of the composition of the materials chosen by nature to produce muscles, neurons, and skin in living creatures. We will describe here some devices ready for commercial applications, such as artificial muscles, smart windows, or smart membranes other industrial products such as polymeric batteries or smart mirrors and processes and devices under development, such as biocompatible nervous system interfaces, smart membranes, and electron-ion transducers, all of them based on the electrochemical behavior of electrodes that are three dimensional at the molecular level. During the discussion we will emphasize the analogies between these electrochemical systems and analogous biological systems. Our aim is to introduce an electrochemistry for conducting polymers, and by extension, for any electrodic process where the structure of the electrode is taken into account. [Pg.312]

A surface is that part of an object which is in direct contact with its environment and hence, is most affected by it. The surface properties of solid organic polymers have a strong impact on many, if not most, of their apphcations. The properties and structure of these surfaces are, therefore, of utmost importance. The chemical stmcture and thermodynamic state of polymer surfaces are important factors that determine many of their practical characteristics. Examples of properties affected by polymer surface stmcture include adhesion, wettability, friction, coatability, permeability, dyeabil-ity, gloss, corrosion, surface electrostatic charging, cellular recognition, and biocompatibility. Interfacial characteristics of polymer systems control the domain size and the stability of polymer-polymer dispersions, adhesive strength of laminates and composites, cohesive strength of polymer blends, mechanical properties of adhesive joints, etc. [Pg.871]

The ability of these peptidomimetic collagen-structures to adopt triple helices portends the development of highly stable biocompatible materials with collagenlike properties. For instance, it has been found that surface-immobilized (Gly-Pro-Meu)io-Gly-Pro-NH2 in its triple-helix conformation stimulated attachment and growth of epithelial cells and fibroblasts in vitro [77]. As a result, one can easily foresee future implementations of biostable collagen mimics such as these, in tissue engineering and for the fabrication of biomedical devices. [Pg.24]

Hybrid organosilicon-organophosphazene polymers have also been synthesized (15-18) (structure ) (the organosilicon groups were introduced via the chemistry shown in Scheme 11). These are elastomers with surface contact angles in the region of 106°. Although no biocompatibility tests have been conducted on these polymers, the molecular structure and material properties would be expected to be similar to or an improvement over those of polysiloxane (silicone) polymers. [Pg.167]

In order to enhance the stability of hposomes and to provide a biocompatible outermost surface shucture for controlled immobihzation (see Section IV), isolated monomeric and oligomeric S-layer protein from B. coagulans E38/vl [118,123,143], B. sphaericus CCM 2177, and the SbsB from B. stearothermophilus PV72/p2 [119] have been crystallized into the respective lattice type on positively charged liposomes composed of DPPC, HD A, and cholesterol. Such S-layer-coated hposomes are spherical biomimetic structures (Fig. 18) that resemble archaeal ceUs (Fig. 14) or virus envelopes. The crystallization of S-... [Pg.372]

Silverstone, L. M. (1982). The structure and characteristics of human dental enamel. In Smith, D. C. Williams, D. F. (eds.) Biocompatibility of Dental Materials. Volume I. Characteristics of Dental Tissues and their Response to Dental Materials, Chapter 2. Boca Raton CRC Press Inc. [Pg.191]

Surfactants employed for w/o-ME formation, listed in Table 1, are more lipophilic than those employed in aqueous systems, e.g., for micelles or oil-in-water emulsions, having a hydrophilic-lipophilic balance (HLB) value of around 8-11 [4-40]. The most commonly employed surfactant for w/o-ME formation is Aerosol-OT, or AOT [sodium bis(2-ethylhexyl) sulfosuccinate], containing an anionic sulfonate headgroup and two hydrocarbon tails. Common cationic surfactants, such as cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) and trioctylmethyl ammonium bromide (TOMAC), have also fulfilled this purpose however, cosurfactants (e.g., fatty alcohols, such as 1-butanol or 1-octanol) must be added for a monophasic w/o-ME (Winsor IV) system to occur. Nonionic and mixed ionic-nonionic surfactant systems have received a great deal of attention recently because they are more biocompatible and they promote less inactivation of biomolecules compared to ionic surfactants. Surfactants with two or more hydrophobic tail groups of different lengths frequently form w/o-MEs more readily than one-tailed surfactants without the requirement of cosurfactant, perhaps because of their wedge-shaped molecular structure [17,41]. [Pg.472]

Biocompatibility. The analysis of polymer implants has been employed using FTIR spectroscopy to elucidate the long-term biocompatibility and quality control of biomedical materials. This method of surface analysis allows the determination of the specific molecular composition and structures most appropriate for long-term compatibility in humans. [Pg.49]

It is evident in Figure 3.5 that the two displayed spectra are slightly different in the band intensities and observed spectral features. This approach is thus suitable for analysing the characteristic band structures to enhance the bio-compatibility of the sapphire lenses, and the surface passivation process enabled more optimized biocompatible lenses to be fabricated. [Pg.50]

In order to identify tyrosine derivatives that would lead to polymers that are processible, mechanically strong, and also biocompatible, we initiated a detailed investigation of the structure-property relationships in polyiminocarbonates and polycarbonates. Since the amino and carboxylic acid groups of tyrosine dipeptide (the N and C termini) provide convenient attachment points, selected pendent chains can be used to modify the overall properties of the polymers. This is an important structural feature of tyrosine dipcptide derived polymers. [Pg.158]

Drug Release from PHEMA-l-PIB Networks. Amphiphilic networks due to their distinct microphase separated hydrophobic-hydrophilic domain structure posses potential for biomedical applications. Similar microphase separated materials such as poly(HEMA- -styrene-6-HEMA), poly(HEMA-6-dimethylsiloxane- -HEMA), and poly(HEMA-6-butadiene- -HEMA) triblock copolymers have demonstrated better antithromogenic properties to any of the respective homopolymers (5-S). Amphiphilic networks are speculated to demonstrate better biocompatibility than either PIB or PHEMA because of their hydrophilic-hydrophobic microdomain structure. These unique structures may also be useful as swellable drug delivery matrices for both hydrophilic and lipophilic drugs due to their amphiphilic nature. Preliminary experiments with theophylline as a model for a water soluble drug were conducted to determine the release characteristics of the system. Experiments with lipophilic drugs are the subject of ongoing research. [Pg.210]


See other pages where Biocompatibility-structure is mentioned: [Pg.5]    [Pg.760]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.760]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.1705]    [Pg.218]    [Pg.677]    [Pg.699]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.374]    [Pg.383]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.263]    [Pg.484]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.266]    [Pg.274]    [Pg.524]    [Pg.180]   


SEARCH



Biocompatibility

Biocompatibility-structure relationships

Polymer Structure, Cytotoxicity and Biocompatibility Relationships

Structure biocompatibility related

© 2024 chempedia.info