Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Diffusivity binary mixtures

In a binary mixture, diffusion coefficients are equal to each other for dissimilar molecules, and Fick s law can determine the molecular mass flows in an isotropic medium at isothermal and isobaric conditions. In a multicomponent diffusion, however, various interactions among the molecules may arise. Some of these interactions are (i) diffusion flows may vanish despite the nonvanishing driving force, which is known as the mass transfer barrier, (ii) diffusion of a component in a direction opposite to that indicated by its driving force leads to a phenomenon called the reverse mass flow, and (iii) diffusion of a component in the absence of its driving force, which is called the osmotic mass flow. [Pg.91]

For binary mixtures diffusing inside porous solids, the applicability of equation (1-100) depends upon the value of a dimensionless ratio called the Knudsen number, Kn, defined as... [Pg.58]

Krishna R, van Baten JM Unified Maxwell-Stefan description of binary mixture diffusion in micro- and meso-porous materials, Chem Eng Sci 64 3159—3178, 2009. [Pg.333]

Diffusivity measures the tendency for a concentration gradient to dissipate to form a molar flux. The proportionality constant between the flux and the potential is called the diffusivity and is expressed in m /s. If a binary mixture of components A and B is considered, the molar flux of component A with respect to a reference plane through which the exchange is equimolar, is expressed as a function of the diffusivity and of the concentration gradient with respect to aji axis Ox perpendicular to the reference plane by the fpllqvving relatipn 6 /... [Pg.136]

For a binary mixture of two components A and B in the gas phase, the mutual diffusion coefficient such as defined in 4.3.2.3, does not depend on composition. It can be calculated by the Fuller (1966) method ... [Pg.146]

The type of treatment described here was originally introduced by Scott and Dullien [4], who confined attention to isothermal isobaric diffusion in binary mixtures. Similar equations were independently published shortly after by Rothfeld [5], and the method was later extended to multi-component mixtures by Silveston [6], Perhaps the most complete exposition is given by Mason and Evans [7],... [Pg.6]

Ac Che limic of Knudsen screaming Che flux relacions (5.25) determine Che fluxes explicitly in terms of partial pressure gradients, but the general flux relacions (5.4) are implicic in Che fluxes and cheir solution does not have an algebraically simple explicit form for an arbitrary number of components. It is therefore important to identify the few cases in which reasonably compact explicit solutions can be obtained. For a binary mixture, simultaneous solution of the two flux equations (5.4) is straightforward, and the result is important because most experimental work on flow and diffusion in porous media has been confined to pure substances or binary mixtures. The flux vectors are found to be given by... [Pg.42]

Che pore size distribution and Che pore geometry. Condition (iil). For isobaric diffusion in a binary mixture Che flux vectors of Che two species must satisfy Graham s relation... [Pg.66]

Condition (iv). For equimolar counter diffusion in a binary mixture, the... [Pg.66]

Though illustrated here by the Scott and Dullien flux relations, this is an example of a general principle which is often overlooked namely, an isobaric set of flux relations cannot, in general, be used to represent diffusion in the presence of chemical reactions. The reason for this is the existence of a relation between the species fluxes in isobaric systems (the Graham relation in the case of a binary mixture, or its extension (6.2) for multicomponent mixtures) which is inconsistent with the demands of stoichiometry. If the fluxes are to meet the constraints of stoichiometry, the pressure gradient must be left free to adjust itself accordingly. We shall return to this point in more detail in Chapter 11. [Pg.70]

They then compared measured and predicted fluxes for diffusion experiments in the mixture He-N. The tests covered a range of pressures and a variety of compositions at the pellet faces but, like the model itself, they were confined to binary mixtures and isobaric conditions. Feng and Stewart [49] compared their models with isobaric flux measurements in binary mixtures and with some non-isobaric measurements in mixtures of helium and nitrogen, using data from a variety of sources. Unfortunately the information on experimental conditions provided in their paper is very sparse, so it is difficult to assess how broadly based are the conclusions they reached about the relative merits oi their different models. [Pg.101]

As a particular case of this result, it follows that the stoichiometric relations are always satisfied in a binary mixture at the limit of bulk diffusion control and Infinite permeability (at least to the extent that the dusty gas equations are valid), since then all the binary pair bulk diffusion coefficients are necessarily equal, as there is only one of them. This special case was discussed by Hite and Jackson [77], and the reasoning set out here is a straightforward generalization of their treatment. [Pg.149]

Despite the very restricted circumstances In which these equations properly describe the dynamical behavior, they are the starting point for almost all the extensive literature on the stability of steady states in catalyst pellets. It is therefore Interesting to examine the case of a binary mixture at the opposite limit, where bulk diffusion controls, to see what form the dynamical equations should take in a coarsely porous pellet. [Pg.164]

When bulk diffusion controls and the d Arcy permeability is large, corresponding to pores of large diameter, the flux relations for a binary mixture reduce to a limiting form given by equation (3.29) and its companion obtained by interchanging the suffixes 1 and 2, namely... [Pg.164]

The conclusion of all these thermodynamic studies is the existence of thiazole-solvent and thiazole-thiazole associations. The most probable mode of association is of the n-rr type from the lone pair of the nitrogen of one molecule to the various other atoms of the other. These associations are confirmed by the results of viscosimetnc studies on thiazole and binary mixtures of thiazole and CCU or QHij. In the case of CCU, there is association of two thiazole molecules with one solvent molecule, whereas cyclohexane seems to destroy some thiazole self-associations (aggregates) existing in the pure liquid (312-314). The same conclusions are drawn from the study of the self-diffusion of thiazole (labeled with C) in thiazole-cyclohexane solutions (114). [Pg.88]

TABLE 5-18 Correlations for Diffusivities of Dilute/ Binary Mixtures of Nonelectrolytes in Liquids... [Pg.597]

Dilute Binary Mixtures of a Nonelectrolyte in Water The correlations that were suggested previously for general mixtures, unless specified otherwise, may also be applied to diffusion of miscellaneous solutes in water. The following correlations are restricted to the present case, however. [Pg.598]

TABLE 5-19 Correlations of Diffusivities for Concentrated/ Binary Mixtures of Nonelectrolyte Liquids... [Pg.599]

Vigne.s empirically correlated mixture diffusivity data for 12 binary mixtures. Later Ertl et al. evaluated 122 binary systems, which showed an average absolute deviation of only 7 percent. None of the latter systems, however, was veiy nonideal. [Pg.599]

Binary Electrolyte Mixtures When electrolytes are added to a solvent, they dissociate to a certain degree. It would appear that the solution contains at least three components solvent, anions, and cations, if the solution is to remain neutral in charge at each point (assuming the absence of any applied electric potential field), the anions and cations diffuse effectively as a single component, as for molecular diffusion. The diffusion or the anionic and cationic species in the solvent can thus be treated as a binary mixture. [Pg.599]

The generalized Stefan-Maxwell equations using binary diffusion coefficients are not easily applicable to hquids since the coefficients are so dependent on conditions. That is, in hquids, each Dy can be strongly composition dependent in binary mixtures and, moreover, the binaiy is strongly affected in a multicomponent mixture. Thus, the convenience of writing multicomponent flux equations in terms of binary coefficients is lost. Conversely, they apply to gas mixtures because each is practically independent of composition by itself and in a multicomponent mixture (see Taylor and Krishna for details). [Pg.600]

FIG. 16 36 Dimensionless time-distance plot for the displacement chromatography of a binary mixture. The darker lines indicate self-sharpening boundaries and the thinner lines diffuse boundaries. Circled numerals indicate the root number. Concentration profiles are shown at intermediate dimensionless column lengths = 0.43 and = 0.765. The profiles remain unchanged for longer column lengths. [Pg.1538]

Figure 4.4-1 Self-diffusion and mutual diffusion in a binary mixture. The self-diffusion coeffi-... Figure 4.4-1 Self-diffusion and mutual diffusion in a binary mixture. The self-diffusion coeffi-...
As a result of the diffusional process, there is no net overall molecular flux arising from diffusion in a binary mixture, the two components being transferred at equal and opposite rates. In the process of equimolecular counterdiffusion which occurs, for example, in a distillation column when the two components have equal molar latent heats, the diffusional velocities are the same as the velocities of the molecular species relative to the walls of the equipment or the phase boundary. [Pg.586]

In a binary mixture consisting of two gaseous components A and B subject to a temperature gradient, the flux due to thermal diffusion is given by GREW and Ibbs 9 ... [Pg.589]

The methods outlined in Reid and Sherwood (87) have been used to estimate the diffusivities characteristic of binary mixtures of the various components of the fluid in the reactor. [Pg.480]


See other pages where Diffusivity binary mixtures is mentioned: [Pg.174]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.1]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.597]    [Pg.598]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.735]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.857]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.481]    [Pg.328]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.110 ]




SEARCH



Binary mixture

Diffusion Coefficients in Binary Liquid Mixtures

Diffusion Coefficients in Binary Mixtures

Diffusion binary mixtures

Diffusion binary mixtures

Diffusion coefficients for binary gas mixtures

Diffusion in Binary Mixtures Ficks First Law

Diffusion in a Binary Critical Mixture

Diffusion in binary gas mixtures

Diffusion of binary mixtures

Mass Transport in Binary Mixtures and the Diffusion Equation

Maxwell-Stefan diffusion binary mixtures

Solution-Diffusion Model for the Transport of Binary Gas Mixtures

© 2024 chempedia.info