Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Behavioral effects motor activity

The most consistent and potent antagonism of amphetamine effects on increased motor activity and stereotyped movements is obtained with antagonists at dopamine receptors of the D2 subtype (Creese et al. 1982). This is not the case with amphetamine s disruptive effects on social and aggressive behavior. So far, no antagonists have been identified that reverse amphetamine s disruption of sexual, play, maternal, or aggressive behavior. [Pg.83]

Miczek, K.A. Differential antagonism of (f-amphetamine effects on motor activity and agonistic behavior in mice. Soc Neurosci Abstr 7 343, 1981a. [Pg.95]

The motor activation produced by psychomotor stimulants has been long associated with the midbrain dopamine systems. While focused stereotyped behavior produced by high doses of indirect sympathomimetics is blocked by removal of dopamine terminals in the corpus striatum (Creese and Iversen 1975), the locomotor activation produced by low doses of indirect sympathomimetics is blocked by removal of dopamine terminals in the region of the nucleus accumbens (Kelly et al. 1975). This dopaminergic substrate for psychostimulant effects appears selective for the indirect sympathomimetics in that dopamine lesions to the region of the nucleus... [Pg.115]

Initially, most prominent effect is elated mood, although depression may occur hypervigilance and anxiety that may progress to panic with high doses or chronic use, may see impairment of judgment, violence to others or self, paranoia or psychosis with delusions and hallucinations (hallucinations are generally tactile or auditory, rarely visual) an increase in motor activity is common compulsive or stereotyped behavior (e.g., skin picking) may be seen severe intoxication may result in a self-limited delirium... [Pg.530]

Stimulants theoretically exert their effect by blocking the reuptake of dopamine and norepinephrine, thus improving academic performance and decreasing motor activity in ADHD patients. Stimulants have been shown to decrease fidgeting and finger tapping, increase on-task classroom behavior and positive interactions at home and in social environments, and ameliorate conduct and anxiety disorders.14... [Pg.637]

The primary system of cannabimimetic activity is the nervous system. The CB1 receptor is omnipresent in the brain, especially in areas that control functions affected by cannabimimetics. One of the functions most pronouncedly influenced by cannabimimetics is motor behavior. Catalepsy, immobility, ataxia, and impairment of complex behavioral acts after acute administration of high doses of cannabimimetics are manifestations of such motor effects (Pertwee, 1997). In lower doses cannabimimetics produce the opposite effects. The very dense presence of CB1 in the cerebellum and the basal ganglia, areas responsible for motor activity, is... [Pg.118]

Symptoms, side effects, and activities of daily living must be scrupulously monitored and therapy individualized. Concomitant medications which may worsen motor symptoms, memory, falls, or behavioral symptoms should be discontinued if possible. [Pg.649]

Neurological Effects. No studies were located regarding neurological effects in humans after exposure to hexachloroethane. Inhalation, oral, and dermal exposure of animals to moderate or high doses (260 ppm, 5,900 ppm, 375 mg/kg/day, 750 mg/kg/day) resulted in hyperactivity, tremors, fasciculation of the facial muscles, ataxia, convulsions, and/or prostration (Fowler 1969b NTP 1977, 1989 Southcott 1951 Weeks et al. 1979). Reduced motor activity has also been observed following oral exposure of pregnant rats (167 mg/kg/day) (Shimizu et al. 1992). Inhalation exposure of rats to 260 ppm for 6 weeks did not have any effect on spontaneous motor activity or shock avoidance behavior (Weeks et al. 1979). [Pg.91]

Neurotoxicity. No information is available on neurotoxic effects of hexachloroethane in humans following any route of exposure. Acute inhalation exposure in rats caused staggering gait after exposure to high concentrations (5,900 ppm) (Weeks et al. 1979). The usefulness of this data is limited since this concentration was lethal. Tremors have been reported at 260 ppm but not 48 ppm following inhalation exposure of rats in a developmental study and in a study of 6-weeks duration (Weeks et al. 1979). The lack of tremors at 48 ppm in the developmental study serves as the basis for the acute inhalation MRL, and the lack of tremors at 48 ppm in the 6-week study serves as the basis for the intermediate inhalation MRL. One study that evaluated spontaneous motor activity and avoidance behavior in rats during 6 weeks of exposure to 260 ppm hexachloroethane vapors did not reveal adverse effects of hexachloroethane on these neurobehavioral functions (Weeks et al. 1979). [Pg.109]

Lazarini CA, Florio JC, Lemonica IP et al (2001) Effects of perinatal exposure to deltamethrin on forced swimming behavior, motor activity, and striatal dopamine levels in male and female rats. Neurotoxicol Teratol 23 665-673... [Pg.105]

Sedative and anxioiytic effects A number of flavonoids have been shown to bind to benzodiazepine receptors and have anxiolytic effects (Medina et al. 1997). The anxiolytic effects of chrysin were examined in mice (Wolfman et al. 1994). Chrysin (1 mg/kg IP) reduces behavioral measures of anxiety (elevated-plus maze) in a manner similar to diazepam (0.3-0.6 mg/kg), which was reversed by pretreatment with a benzodiazepine antagonist, Ro 15-1788. The anxiolytic effect is not likely due to sedation because there is no concurrent reduction in motor activity at the doses used. Unlike diazepam, chrysin does not produce muscle relaxation at higher doses. [Pg.238]

The effects of THC on motor activity are dependent on dosage, species examined, and behavioral paradigm used. THC increases activity in mice... [Pg.426]

Baldo BA, Sadeghian K, Basso AM, Kelley AE. 2002. Effects of selective dopamine D1 or D2 receptor blockade within nucleus accumbens subregions on ingestive behavior and associated motor activity. Behav Brain Res 137(1-2) 165-177. [Pg.243]


See other pages where Behavioral effects motor activity is mentioned: [Pg.431]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.379]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.430]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.330]    [Pg.316]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.916]    [Pg.816]    [Pg.1080]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.262]    [Pg.192]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.264]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.403]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.816]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.325 , Pg.326 , Pg.327 , Pg.328 , Pg.329 ]




SEARCH



Activity behavior

Behavioral activation

Behavioral effects

Effects behavior

Motor activity

© 2024 chempedia.info