Beamsplitter experiments

There was thus the need for optical experiments showing the flaws of classical electrodynamics. An important difference between a wave and a particle is with respect to a beam splitter a wave can be split in two while a photon can not. An intensity correlation measurement between the two output ports of the beamsplitter is a good test as a wave would give a non zero correlation while a particle would show no correlation, the particle going either in one arm or the other. However, when one takes an attenuated source, such as the one used by Taylor, it contains single photon pulses but also a (small) fraction of two... 

Another possibility, a variant of the previous experiment, is shown in Fig. 9, where the wave 0 from the generator is halved at the beamsplitter and the two... 

The concrete experiment consists of using a modified Mach-Zehnder interferometer. In each arm of the interferometer we place the same number of similar beamsplitters, as shown in Fig. 15. The monophotonic source S emits... 

Figure 1. An up-to-date arrangement the of Michelson-Morley experiment. Here LASER means the source of light, BS means beamsplitter, Ml and M2 are mirrors on the end of arms, PD is the phase detector (interferometer), and v is the earth s orbital velocity, which is regarded as the inertial motion for short time periods.

Figure 3. Arrangement of Sagnac the experiment. Here, LASER represents the source of light, the first mirror is a beamsplitter, M1-M3 are mirrors on the end of arms, and I represents the interferometer.

Figure 7 Schematic of the laser system used in the Raman FID and echo experiments. PC = Pulse compressor AOM = acousto-optic modulator PD = photodiode FB = feedback electronics PBS = polarizing beamsplitter 3PBF = 3-plate birefringent filter SDL/LDL = Stokes/Laser dye laser P = pellicle AC = autocorrelator OC = output coupler LBO/KDP = doubling crystals. Final pulses have widths of 0.5-1 ps and energies of 0.3-1 mJ (From Ref. 6.)... 

Figure 8 Schematic of the optical system used to perform the Raman FID and echo experiments. P = Polarizer (D)BS = (dichroic) beamsplitter MD = manual delay line SD = computer-scanned delay line CSA = charge sensitive amplifier CH = chopper PH = pinhole S = sample F = bandpass and neutral density filters PD = photodiode A/D = analog-to-digital converter PC = computer PMT = photomultiplier X/2 = half-wave plate. (From Ref. 6.)...

The arrangement employed for the VPC experiment is described in Reference 4. A cw argon-ion laser at 488 nm was used in a standard DFWM geometry. The s-polarized output beam was first split by a beam-splitter to provide the pump and the probe beams. The transmitted beam from the beam-splitter was then divided into the two s-polarized pump beams each with a power of approximately 0.35 mW. The reflected beam from the beamsplitter was used as the probe beam, whose intensity was about 7% of the total intensity in both pump beams. The forward pump beam and the probe, which constituted writing beams, were overlapped at the sample. Their optical path length difference was much smaller than the laser coherence length, so that they were coherent at the sample. The backward pump beam was... 

Gas phase experiments of the six CWAS were performed in a Bruker Optics FTIR model IFS 66v/S spectrometer equipped with a DTGS detector and a potassium bromide (KBr) beamsplitter. A gas cell was placed in the macro compartment and adapted to a micro pump that removed background air and transferred the sample to the cell. DMMP and DIMP were used for these analyses. One gram of the CWAS was deposited on an Erlemneyer. A typical spectroscopic measurement averaged 20 scans at a resolution of 4 cm in the range of 400 - 7500 cm. Gas phase IR spectra were also acquired using Bruker Optics OPUS , Version 4.2. A background of air in the cell was recorded before each run of the CWAS experiments. 

As was mention above, the photophysical parameters of fluorophores (o> K sz and r in the model (la) and Td, ta, Od, Oa, Kda and Kss in the model (lb)) can be determined from the dependence Nn(F), by solving the inverse problem. However, in experiments, it is convenient to normalize the number of detected fluorescence photons Nn to the reference signal (will denote as Nfe/), which can represent a part of exciting radiation directed to the reference channel of the detection system by a beamsplitter or a Raman scattering signal from water molecules (Fadeev et al., 1999). In this case, one has to deal with the dependence [(F)]- =NRe/Nn (which is also called a saturation curve, (F) is the fluorescence pjarameter) rather than Nfi(F). According to the practical experience such normalization also helps to increase the stability of the inverse problem solution. In the absence of saturation, 0 stop ... 

At pH 9 the DRIFT difference spectrum for As(V) on am-Fe(OH)3 appears to have two peaks, at 872 and 820 cm", as shown in Figure 11b. Similar results were obtained with the FTS-7 and the Csl beamsplitter in a completely replicated experiment, except that additional peaks were identified around 700, 605, and 480 cm. The two peaks at 605 and 480 cm are tentatively identified as the and V4 modes, which are below the detection of our FTS-175 system. Interpretation of the spectra obtained at pH 9 is not clear as the two peaks at 872 and 820 cm appear split much more than expected for the V3 split assigned to H2ASO4". It also does not appear reasonable to consider HAs04 " adsorption at pH 5 and H2ASO4 adsorption at pH 9. The following reaction... 

FIGURE 14 Setup for second- and third-harmonic generation by means of Maker fringe technique. BS, beamsplitter F, 2.3. filters L, lens S, sample on a rotation stage (evacuable sample chamber especially for THG experiments) R, reference P, polarizer Ma.b, monochromators PM photomultiplier PA, amplifier PD, photodiode T, trigger entrance of the boxcar amplifier. (From Ref. 26.)... 

Fig. 25. Combined optical and x-ray experiment. By using a thin x-ray transparent mirror a polarized light beam is guided parallel to the x-ray beam through the sample. A second mirror mounted on the x-ray beam spot deflects the light onto a photodiode. The sample orientation can be influenced by using an electric field. Key D = detector P = polarizer M = mirror S = sample B = beamsplitter SM = stepper motor TFG = time frame generator. Courtesy of N. Gleeson.

Figure 8. Photon-pair correlation analysis of single molecule emission, (a) The temporal separation of photon pairs can be analyzed by a Hanbury-Brown and Twiss experiment, where the fluorescence photon flux is divided by a 50/50 beamsplitter and detected by two avalanche photo diodes (APDs). By delaying the arrival time of signals from one detector, simultaneous photon events can be detected if the delay time is known, (b) Photon-pair correlation analysis of - 1000 molecules of Rhodamine 6G probed individually by the setup shown in (a). Single fluorescent molecules can only emit one molecule at a time (photon antibunching), which results in an anti-correlation of photon events for times shorter than the fluorescence lifetime. By fitting such a histogram, the fluorescence lifetime and the number of molecules probed in the excitation spot can be extracted. For an increasing number of molecules, the dip at time zero begins to become less well expressed, because the probability for simultaneous photon emission increases.

---