Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Configuration Interaction Basis

Atomic natural orbital (ANO) basis sets [44] are fonned by contracting Gaussian fiinctions so as to reproduce the natural orbitals obtained from correlated (usually using a configuration interaction with... [Pg.2171]

The configuration interaction calculation with all possible excitations is called a full Cl. The full Cl calculation using an infinitely large basis set will give an exact quantum mechanical result. However, full Cl calculations are very rarely done due to the immense amount of computer power required. [Pg.24]

HyperChem uses single determinant rather than spin-adapted wave functions to form a basis set for the wave functions in a configuration interaction expansion. That is, HyperChem expands a Cl wave function, in a linear combination of single Slater determ in ants... [Pg.235]

The amount of computation for MP2 is determined by the partial transformation of the two-electron integrals, what can be done in a time proportionally to m (m is the number of basis functions), which is comparable to computations involved in one step of CID (doubly-excited configuration interaction) calculation. To save some computer time and space, the core orbitals are frequently omitted from MP calculations. For more details on perturbation theory please see A. Szabo and N. Ostlund, Modem Quantum Chemistry, Macmillan, New York, 1985. [Pg.238]

Among the most widely used ab initio methods are those referred to as Gl" and 02." These methods incorporate large basis sets including d and / orbitals, called 6-311. The calculations also have extensive configuration interaction terms at the Moller-Plesset fourth order (MP4) and fiirther terms referred to as quadratic configuration interaction (QCISD). ° Finally, there are systematically applied correction terms calibrated by exact energies from small molecules. [Pg.26]

Each cell in the chart defines a model chemistry. The columns correspond to differcni theoretical methods and the rows to different basis sets. The level of correlation increases as you move to the right across any row, with the Hartree-Fock method jI the extreme left (including no correlation), and the Full Configuration Interaction method at the right (which fuUy accounts for electron correlation). In general, computational cost and accuracy increase as you move to the right as well. The relative costs of different model chemistries for various job types is discussed in... [Pg.94]

There is no systematic way in which the exchange correlation functional Vxc[F] can be systematically improved in standard HF-LCAO theory, we can improve on the model by increasing the accuracy of the basis set, doing configuration interaction or MPn calculations. What we have to do in density functional theory is to start from a model for which there is an exact solution, and this model is the uniform electron gas. Parr and Yang (1989) write... [Pg.225]

The Parameterized Configuration Interaction (PCI-X) method simply takes the correlation energy and scales it by a constant factor X (typical value 1.2), i.e. it is assumed that the given combination of method and basis set recovers a constant fraction of the correlation energy. [Pg.169]

On the basis of the optimized ground-slate geometries, we simulate the absorption speetra by combining the scmicmpirical Hartree-Fock Intermediate Neglect of Differential Overlap (INDO) Hamiltonian to a Single Configuration Interaction... [Pg.372]

Table 1. Configuration Interaction energy calculation with a minimal STO — 3G basis of the four lower singlet states of H2O. Table 1. Configuration Interaction energy calculation with a minimal STO — 3G basis of the four lower singlet states of H2O.
The frequency dependence is taken into accoimt through a mixed time-dependent method which introduces a dipole-moment factor (i.e. a polynomial of first degree in the electronic coordinates ) in a SCF-CI (Self Consistent Field with Configuration Interaction) method (3). The dipolar factor, ensuring the gauge invariance, partly simulates the molecular basis set effects and the influence of the continuum states. A part of these effects is explicitly taken into account in an extrapolation procedure which permits to circumvent the sequels of the truncation of the infinite sum-over- states. [Pg.262]

The K-matrix method is essentially a configuration interaction (Cl) performed at a fixed energy lying in the continuum upon a basis of "unperturbed funetions that (at the formal level) includes both diserete and eontinuous subsets. It turns the Schrodinger equation into a system of integral equations for the K-matrix elements, which is then transformed into a linear system by a quadrature upon afinite L basis set. [Pg.368]


See other pages where Configuration Interaction Basis is mentioned: [Pg.232]    [Pg.303]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.303]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.2177]    [Pg.2341]    [Pg.465]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.256]    [Pg.395]    [Pg.298]    [Pg.322]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.329]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.219]    [Pg.335]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.254]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.290]    [Pg.292]    [Pg.433]    [Pg.689]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.186]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.128 , Pg.131 , Pg.136 , Pg.178 , Pg.230 ]




SEARCH



Configuration Interaction

Configuration interaction atomic orbital basis

Configuration interaction basis sets

Configuration interaction symmetry basis

Configurational interaction

© 2024 chempedia.info