Basic Operations and Number Concepts

Let s jump into math by first discussing the different types of numbers. Numbers with different names have different properties. Some of the terms you should know are listed below. 

Any composite number can be written as the product of prime numbers. This simply means that if you break the factors of any composite number down far enough, you will arrive at a set of prime numbers. 

For example, try the number 42. It is equal to 21 times 2. Since 21 is not a prime number, divide further 21 = 7 x 3, so 42 = 2x7x3. Because 2,7, and 3 have no factors other than 1 and themselves, they are all prime numbers. 

The absolute value of a number is just its positive distance from zero. For example, -31 =3-15 =5, and y = y. 

Research hexadecimal numbers. Here we are dealing with more than 10 digits. How is that possible Explore and find out  

---

The theory of steady-state reactions operates with the concepts of "a path of the step , "a path of the route , and "the reaction rate along the basic route . Let us give their determination in accordance with ref. 16. The number of step paths is interpreted as the difference of the number of elementary reaction acts in the direct and reverse directions. Then the rate for the direct step is equal to that of the paths per unit time in unit reaction space. One path along the route signifies that every step has as many paths as its stoichiometric number for a given route. In the case when the formation of a molecule in one of the steps is compensated by its consumption in the other step, the steady-state reaction process is realized. If, in the course of this step, no final product but a new intermediate is formed, then it is this... 

Difficulties begin with the second situation as before, there is some parallelism between some source domain operators and elementary device operators vis-a-vis some sub-goals, but the side-effects may differ. Let us go further into the analogy between the concept of assignment in BASIC and the put-in-box concept in the box domain (Burstein, 1988) the action put object O into box X produces the result box X contains object O , and typing X=3 produces the result X has the value 3 . Now, if you put into the box X a second object, either box X is full and the second object stays on top of the first object, or there is some room left and the second object sinks into box X. But if you type X=3 then X=4, the number 3 disappears. 

The remainder of this text attempts to establish a rational framework within which many of these questions can be attacked. We will see that there is often considerable freedom of choice available in terms of the type of reactor and reaction conditions that will accomplish a given task. The development of an optimum processing scheme or even of an optimum reactor configuration and mode of operation requires a number of complex calculations that often involve iterative numerical calculations. Consequently machine computation is used extensively in industrial situations to simplify the optimization task. Nonetheless, we have deliberately chosen to present the concepts used in reactor design calculations in a framework that insofar as possible permits analytical solutions in order to divorce the basic concepts from the mass of detail associated with machine computation. 

Union Carbide (34) and in particular Dow adopted the continuous mass polymerization process. Credit goes to Dow (35) for improving the old BASF process in such a way that good quality impact-resistant polystyrenes became accessible. The result was that impact-resistant polystyrene outstripped unmodified crystal polystyrene. Today, some 60% of polystyrene is of the impact-resistant type. The technical improvement involved numerous details it was necessary to learn how to handle highly viscous polymer melts, how to construct reactors for optimum removal of the reaction heat, how to remove residual monomer and solvents, and how to convey and meter melts and mix them with auxiliaries (antioxidants, antistatics, mold-release agents and colorants). All this was necessary to obtain not only an efficiently operating process but also uniform quality products differentiated to meet the requirements of various fields of application. In the meantime this process has attained technical maturity over the years it has been modified a number of times (Shell in 1966 (36), BASF in 1968 (37), Granada Plastics in 1970 (38) and Monsanto in 1975 (39)) but the basic concept has been retained. 

The basic notions of the theory of difference schemes are the error of approximation, stability, convergence, and accuracy of difference scheme. A more detailed exposition of these concepts will appear in Chapter 2. They are illustrated by considering a number of difference schemes for ordinary differential equations. In the same chapter we also outline the approach to the general formulations without regard to the particular form of the difference operator. 

---