Barrier frozen ground

Molecular diffusion remains as the dominant transport mechanism through the best barriers achievable [Daniel 1988]. The rate of transport is governed by several factors, including the inherent properties of the materials, thermodynamic factors, and barrier design. We estimate the diffusion through frozen ground, as follows. 

As discussed above, the cryogenic barriers will be composed of frozen ground containing one or more lenses of solid ice. The diffusion in each type of region will be treated separately. 

The permeability of frozen ground barriers was directly measured in a recent laboratory project for the US Department of Energy. The soils were uncontaminated samples from DoE nuclear reservations a coarse silty sand from Hanford, Washington, and a clay soil from Oak Ridge, Tennessee. The test fluids were dilute aqueous solutions of potassium chromate K2CrO ) trichloroethylene (TCE) and radioactive cesium ( CsC/2), concentrated CaC/2 brine, and pure decane. The choice of soils and chemicals provided a sampling of the characteristics of liquid contaminants at many of the DoE s leaking nuclear waste sites. 

The demonstration provided a practical example on which to base the cost of frozen ground barriers. After subtracting the special expenses for extra sensors and test support, the first year cost per cubic meter for installation and maintenance is estimated as 200, and the average maintenance cost over a 15-year period is estimated as 2.20 per cubic meter per year. The estimate of long term cost is based on calculated thermal losses in a typical soil, equipment amortization expense, power and maintenance costs [Dash 1989]. The cost per unit volume was relatively high because of the small size of the installation. 

Grant SA 1997, Artificially Frozen Ground as a Subsurface Barrier Technology,in Barrier Technologies for Environmental Management, D-153, Natl Res Council, Natl Academy Press, Wash DC. 

Table 2 presents vendor-supplied cost estimates for implementing their frozen barrier technology at brownfield redevelopment sites. Costs for RKK s system are compared with costs for a sheet pile wall barrier. The estimates are based on the cost of containment at a 3.5-acre site with contamination 50 ft below ground surface (D221647, p. 3). 

The ground-state interconversion via the distorted tetrahedron is prevented by a large barrier (see in the following). Similarly, although the electronic ground state of low-spin d6 Cr(CO)5 is square pyramidal (in the low-temperature matrix, any thermal fluxional behavior is frozen out), the geometry of the first excited state (intermediate-spin... 

Some of the worst conditions are met in excavations that have to be taken below the water table (Forth, 2004). In such cases, the water level must be lowered by some method of dewatering. The method adopted depends on the permeability of the ground and its variation within the stratal sequence, the depth of base level below the water table and the piezometric conditions in underlying horizons. Pumping from sumps within an excavation, bored wells or wellpoints are the dewatering methods most frequently used (Bell and Cashman, 1986). Impermeable barriers such as steel sheet piles, secant piles, diaphragm walls, frozen walls and grouted walls can be used to keep water out of excavations (Bell and Mitchell, 1986). Ideally, these structures should be keyed into an impermeable horizon beneath the excavation. 

Fig. 7.26 Selected static properties of phenol-(NH3)3. (a) The potential energy surfaces for the nine low-lying excited states, one-dimenional projection in OH distance with the other degrees of freedom frozen at the ground state geometry shown in panel (b). The height of the potential barrier of the lowest excited state is about 0.0029 hartree (0.8 eV). (c) and (f) the bond order of OH and NH. (d) and (g) the Mulliken charge for the site of PhO, the transferring proton site (trH), the total ammonia cluster (AMC), and ammonia molecule AMI that is hydrogen-bonded to phenol, (e) and (h) unpaired electron population at the same sites as in panel (d) and (g). Panels (c), (d), and (e) are for the first excited state, while (f), (g), and (h) exhibit for the second excited state. (Reprinted with permission from K. Nagashima et al., J. Phys. Chem. A 116, 11167 (2012)).

Dash, JG, Fu H and Leger R, 1997. Frozen soil barriers for hazardous waste confinement, in Ground Freezing 97, S Knutsson, ed., AA Balkema Rotterdam, p.375... 

---