Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Averaging sample

If agitation and heating are not practical as in the cases of large volumes, it is better to withdraw samples from various levels in order to get an average sample. [Pg.28]

Because the datay are random, the statistics based on y, S(y), are also random. For all possible data y (usually simulated) that can be predicted from H, calculate p(S(ysim) H), the probability distribution of the statistic S on simulated data y ii given the truth of the hypothesis H. If H is the statement that 6 = 0, then y i might be generated by averaging samples of size N (a characteristic of the actual data) with variance G- = G- (yacmai) (yet another characteristic of the data). [Pg.319]

Finally, the material presented in this chapter paves the way for further improvements in free energy calculations. Two promising directions for future studies are improving the methods for sampling phase space so that is satisfies the most effective overlap and/or subset relationships and developing better techniques for averaging samples and extrapolating from finite-sampled sets. [Pg.244]

Results for an average sample in a series of 3-5 coin cells, during the first 4-5 cycles. According to the Product Information Bulletins of SGC Purified Battery Grade Graphite. [Pg.315]

The following data were obtained on an average sample of calcium leucovorin ... [Pg.327]

Sampling and analytical methods Locations for the outlet sediment (overbank) samples are shown in Figure 1. In all, 99 catchments were sampled giving an average sample density of 1 site/1540 km2. At most sites three samples were taken (a) a top outlet sediment (TOS) from 0-10 cm depth (b) a bottom outlet sediment (BOS) from 60-90 cm depth and (c) a shallow outlet sediment (SOS) from 10-25 cm depth specifically for MMI determinations. Two size fractions (<180 pm and <75 pm) were prepared from the TOS and BOS samples. The SOS sample for multi-element MMI (MMI-M) analysis by method ME-MS17 was provided to ALS Chemex in its bulk form. [Pg.233]

Laboratory experiments of this type have the great advantage that the initial conditions can be well defined (although often they are not ), in contrast with the average sample of urban air, which is a mixture of new and old pollutants. Also, in laboratory experiments, the same sample of air is observed over a long period, which is not possible with most air pollution monitoring networks. For these reasons, most attempts to understand the chemistry of oxidant formation have concentrated on smog-chamber experiments, rather than the real atmosphere. [Pg.16]

The sample cycle is now ffnished and the sample transport steps to the next sample. The average sample cycle time is 3 minutes wath four measuring instruments. [Pg.204]

Petrographic observations were made on polished thin sections, for 313 outcrop samples. Average sample spacing was one sample per 1 km within a radius of 15 km or less from the known porphyry Cu-Mo deposits, and one sample per 2 km outside this area. Five rock types are distinguished in the district andesites, diorites, granodiorites, dacites, rhyolites and sandstones. Rhyolites and dacites dominate in the zone of known porphyry Cu-Mo deposits. Sandstones are much less common and were not studied. [Pg.149]

Elemental carbon concentrations are the result of incomplete combustion. These primary carbon particles should closely track the gas phase products of combustion processes. Figures 6 and 7 show that this is indeed the case. Figure 6 presents the relationship between 1-hour average samples of elemental carbon and total oxides of nitrogen. Figure 7 shows the relationship between elemental carbon and CO. One reason for the scatter in the CO results is that the data are only reported to the nearest ppm. [Pg.244]

In this paper we have shown that there is no simple answer to the question posed in the title of this paper. Primary carbon particles dominate the carbonaceous aerosol under certain conditions while substantial secondary carbon may be present at other times. However, the importance of secondary carbon contributions is much less obvious when 24-h samples are examined. With shorter time averaged samples (e.g. 6-h or less) the increase in secondary carbon formation can be more easily detected. Secondary carbon appears to be more important in the summer rather than winter, in the afternoon father than the early morning, and in LA rather than St. Louis. It should be noted that these conditions of increased secondary carbon aerosol formation are also more favorable conditions for photochemical reactions. Our detailed emission inventory Indicates that much more primary carbon exists in the urban aerosol than was thought previously. This is in agreement with the data. Our analysis shows that even on the very smoggy days in the ACHEX study there were times when primary carbon dominated the carbonaceous aerosol. [Pg.266]

A number of hydrolysis products of chloroaluminafe salfs have been defecfed using FAB MS. The problem here is that under some circumstances FAB MS can provide only a restricted view on the surface of fhe sample that is more likely to be oxidized or hydrolyzed rather than the average sample [13]. Nevertheless, this problem is not directly related to MS itself, but rather to a problem of proper sample preparation. Inert conditions during sample preparation and construction of special sample inlet chambers for MS can help avoid fhese reacfions. The addition of phosgene was suggested to reduce problems encountered with such side reactions [22], but here the problems encountered in working with an extremely toxic chemical have to be taken into account. [Pg.381]

Errors in sampling (sample volume determination) are due to erroneous measurement of time or flow rate. Time can be measured so accurately that flow rate errors make up the majority of the 10% variation attributed to the average sampling pump. [Pg.491]

The approach to estimate the shelf life of a single batch can be applied to the pooled stability data from all batches. Thus, the shelf life is obtained by finding the minimum root of Equation (10), where a and b are the estimates of a and p from model (45), respectively, x is the average sampling time, and Sxx is defined by Equation (4) and considering for all sampling times. [Pg.608]

Precipitate with aq. ammonia. Evaporate the soln. down to about 100 c.c., and filter the ot liquid so as to remove calcium sulphate. The cone. soln. is sat. with ammonium alum and allowed to stand for some time. The mixed crystals of potassium, rubidium, and oeesium alums and of lithium salt are dissolved in 100 c.c. of distilled water and recrystal-lized. The recrystallization is repeated until the crystals show no spectroscopic reaction for potassium or lithium. The yield naturally depends on the variety of lepidolite employed. 100. grms of an average sample gives about 10 grms. of crude crystals and about 3 grms. of the purified caesium and rubidium alums. For the purification of caesium and rubidium salts, see the chlorides. The mother-liquors are treated with an excess of barium carbonate, boiled, and filtered. The filtrate is acidified with hydrochloric acid, and evaporated to dryness. The residue is extracted with absolute alcohol in which lithium chloride is soluble, and the other alkali chlorides are sparingly soluble. [Pg.444]

Cybulski has shown that very fine coal-dust contains a higher proportion of volatile matter than the average sample. This increases the danger created by fine coal-dust. [Pg.420]

MEAN COMPOSITION OF AVERAGE SAMPLES OF NEWCASTLE COALS. [Pg.80]

Two probes were fabricated for sampling the precipitator inlet, one for the precipitator outlet, and one for the stack. By limiting the number of test points at each plane in the precipitator outlet, the average sampling time required to complete a test was about 280-300 min. The types and numbers of samples collected for each complete run are shown in Table I. Twenty-four distinct samples were taken for each complete test run. [Pg.185]

Gas Analysis. Most of the analyses were carried out either on the average" sample taken during an experiment or on a sample extracted from the total gas sample. Some spot samples were also taken to investigate the variation in composition during an experiment. The gas analyses were carried out mainly using either gas chromatographic or infrared methods, but in some cases the... [Pg.647]


See other pages where Averaging sample is mentioned: [Pg.107]    [Pg.267]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.717]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.910]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.394]    [Pg.447]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.490]    [Pg.416]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.393]    [Pg.601]    [Pg.525]    [Pg.512]    [Pg.295]    [Pg.298]    [Pg.487]    [Pg.733]    [Pg.735]    [Pg.212]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.12 , Pg.14 ]




SEARCH



Sample average

© 2024 chempedia.info