Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Atoms theoretical model

As reactants transfonn to products in a chemical reaction, reactant bonds are broken and refomied for the products. Different theoretical models are used to describe this process ranging from time-dependent classical or quantum dynamics [1,2], in which the motions of individual atoms are propagated, to models based on the postidates of statistical mechanics [3], The validity of the latter models depends on whether statistical mechanical treatments represent the actual nature of the atomic motions during the chemical reaction. Such a statistical mechanical description has been widely used in imimolecular kinetics [4] and appears to be an accurate model for many reactions. It is particularly instructive to discuss statistical models for unimolecular reactions, since the model may be fomuilated at the elementary microcanonical level and then averaged to obtain the canonical model. [Pg.1006]

As in the case of the free bases, the substitution of a nuclear hydrogen atom by a methyl group induces a bathochromic shift that decreases in the order of the position substituted 4->5->2- Ferre et al. (187) have proposed a theoretical model based on the PPP (tt) method using the fractional core charge approximation that reproduces quite correctly this Order of decreasing perturbation. [Pg.50]

Much of the experimental work in chemistry deals with predicting or inferring properties of objects from measurements that are only indirectly related to the properties. For example, spectroscopic methods do not provide a measure of molecular stmcture directly, but, rather, indirecdy as a result of the effect of the relative location of atoms on the electronic environment in the molecule. That is, stmctural information is inferred from frequency shifts, band intensities, and fine stmcture. Many other types of properties are also studied by this indirect observation, eg, reactivity, elasticity, and permeabiHty, for which a priori theoretical models are unknown, imperfect, or too compHcated for practical use. Also, it is often desirable to predict a property even though that property is actually measurable. Examples are predicting the performance of a mechanical part by means of nondestmctive testing (qv) methods and predicting the biological activity of a pharmaceutical before it is synthesized. [Pg.417]

Advances have been made in directly measuring the forces between two surfaces using freshly cleaved mica surfaces mounted on supports (15), and silica spheres in place of the sharp tip of an atomic force microscopy probe (16). These measurements can be directly related to theoretical models of surface forces. [Pg.149]

Fig. 2. By rolling up a graphene sheet (a single layer of ear-bon atoms from a 3D graphite erystal) as a cylinder and capping each end of the eyiinder with half of a fullerene molecule, a fullerene-derived tubule, one layer in thickness, is formed. Shown here is a schematic theoretical model for a single-wall carbon tubule with the tubule axis OB (see Fig. 1) normal to (a) the 6 = 30° direction (an armchair tubule), (b) the 6 = 0° direction (a zigzag tubule), and (c) a general direction B with 0 < 6 < 30° (a chiral tubule). The actual tubules shown in the figure correspond to (n,m) values of (a) (5,5), (b) (9,0), and (c) (10,5). Fig. 2. By rolling up a graphene sheet (a single layer of ear-bon atoms from a 3D graphite erystal) as a cylinder and capping each end of the eyiinder with half of a fullerene molecule, a fullerene-derived tubule, one layer in thickness, is formed. Shown here is a schematic theoretical model for a single-wall carbon tubule with the tubule axis OB (see Fig. 1) normal to (a) the 6 = 30° direction (an armchair tubule), (b) the 6 = 0° direction (a zigzag tubule), and (c) a general direction B with 0 < 6 < 30° (a chiral tubule). The actual tubules shown in the figure correspond to (n,m) values of (a) (5,5), (b) (9,0), and (c) (10,5).
In this paper, we review progress in the experimental detection and theoretical modeling of the normal modes of vibration of carbon nanotubes. Insofar as the theoretical calculations are concerned, a carbon nanotube is assumed to be an infinitely long cylinder with a mono-layer of hexagonally ordered carbon atoms in the tube wall. A carbon nanotube is, therefore, a one-dimensional system in which the cyclic boundary condition around the tube wall, as well as the periodic structure along the tube axis, determine the degeneracies and symmetry classes of the one-dimensional vibrational branches [1-3] and the electronic energy bands[4-12]. [Pg.129]

Our present views on the electronic structure of atoms are based on a variety of experimental results and theoretical models which are fully discussed in many elementary texts. In summary, an atom comprises a central, massive, positively charged nucleus surrounded by a more tenuous envelope of negative electrons. The nucleus is composed of neutrons ( n) and protons ([p, i.e. H ) of approximately equal mass tightly bound by the force field of mesons. The number of protons (2) is called the atomic number and this, together with the number of neutrons (A ), gives the atomic mass number of the nuclide (A = N + Z). An element consists of atoms all of which have the same number of protons (2) and this number determines the position of the element in the periodic table (H. G. J. Moseley, 191.3). Isotopes of an element all have the same value of 2 but differ in the number of neutrons in their nuclei. The charge on the electron (e ) is equal in size but opposite in sign to that of the proton and the ratio of their masses is 1/1836.1527. [Pg.22]

Crystal-field theory (CFT) was constructed as the first theoretical model to account for these spectral differences. Its central idea is simple in the extreme. In free atoms and ions, all electrons, but for our interests particularly the outer or non-core electrons, are subject to three main energetic constraints a) they possess kinetic energy, b) they are attracted to the nucleus and c) they repel one another. (We shall put that a little more exactly, and symbolically, later). Within the environment of other ions, as for example within the lattice of a crystal, those electrons are expected to be subject also to one further constraint. Namely, they will be affected by the non-spherical electric field established by the surrounding ions. That electric field was called the crystalline field , but we now simply call it the crystal field . Since we are almost exclusively concerned with the spectral and other properties of positively charged transition-metal ions surrounded by anions of the lattice, the effect of the crystal field is to repel the electrons. [Pg.27]

How large are orbitals Experiments that measure atomic radii provide information about the size of an orbital. In addition, theoretical models of the atom predict how the electron density of a particular orbital changes with distance from the nucleus, r. When these sources of information are combined, they reveal several regular features about orbital size. [Pg.476]

Thus, we have considered in detail various theoretical models of effect of adsorption of molecular, atom and radical particles on electric conductivity of semiconductor adsorbents of various crystalline types. Special attention has been paid to sintered and partially reduced oxide adsorbents characterized by the bridge type of intercrystalline contacts with the dominant content of bridges of open type because of wide domain of application of this very type of adsorbents as sensitive elements used in our physical and chemical studies. [Pg.163]

A substantial improvement in the theoretical modeling of this substrate, able to overcome the drawbacks of both former approaches (standard GGA and localized atomic basis set B3LYP) is the implementation of the HSE03 [36] hybrid functionals in a plane-wave formalism. [Pg.113]

In the Introduction the problem of construction of a theoretical model of the metal surface was briefly discussed. If a model that would permit the theoretical description of the chemisorption complex is to be constructed, one must decide which type of the theoretical description of the metal should be used. Two basic approaches exist in the theory of transition metals (48). The first one is based on the assumption that the d-elec-trons are localized either on atoms or in bonds (which is particularly attractive for the discussion of the surface problems). The other is the itinerant approach, based on the collective model of metals (which was particularly successful in explaining the bulk properties of metals). The choice between these two is not easy. Even in contemporary solid state literature the possibility of d-electron localization is still being discussed (49-51). Examples can be found in the literature that discuss the following problems high cohesion energy of transition metals (52), their crystallographic structure (53), magnetic moments of the constituent atoms in alloys (54), optical and photoemission properties (48, 49), and plasma oscillation losses (55). [Pg.65]


See other pages where Atoms theoretical model is mentioned: [Pg.2885]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.381]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.515]    [Pg.401]    [Pg.389]    [Pg.379]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.748]    [Pg.292]    [Pg.322]    [Pg.330]    [Pg.385]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.576]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.276]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.365]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.342]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.243]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.192]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.138]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.198 , Pg.199 ]




SEARCH



Atomic modeling

Atomic modelling

Atomic models

Atoms models

Some Theoretical Atomic Models

Theoretical model

Theoretical modeling

Theoretical modelling

© 2024 chempedia.info