Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Atomic orbitals interactions between

The rationale behind this choice of bond integrals is that the radical stabilizing alpha effect of such radicals are explained not by the usual "resonance form" arguments, but by invoking frontier orbital interactions between the singly occupied molecular orbital of the localized carbon radical and the highest occupied molecular orbital (the non-bonding electrons atomic orbital) of the heteroatom (6). For free radicals the result of the SOMO-HOMO interaction Ts a net "one-half" pi bond (a pi bond plus a one-half... [Pg.417]

Formally, the lone pairs on molecular nitrogen, hydrogen cyanide, and carbon monoxide are sp hybrid orbitals, whereas NLMO hybridizations calculated even lower p contributions. Hence, these lone pairs have low directionality, the electron density remains close to the coordinating atom and interaction between the lone pair and the Be2+ is comparatively weak. The Be-L bonds are easily disrupted and ligand exchange consequently can proceed with a low activation barrier. A high degree of p character, on the other hand, means that the lone pair is directed toward beryllium, with electron density close to the metal center, and thus well suited for coordination. [Pg.555]

Calculations on the isoelectronic series Me(Ph)B , Me(Ph)C , and [Me(Ph)N ]+ show that the singlet-state geometries are different, reflecting differences in the orbital interactions between the hypovalent atom and the 7r-system. The high calculated barrier (21.5 kcal moP ) for [1,2]-H shift in the nitrenium ion is the result of migration using the orbital which is conjugated with the tt-system. [Pg.268]

The delocalization of the HOMO and LUMO arises from pseudo-ir orbital interactions between adjacent 3px and 3py atomic orbitals of Si atoms, respectively. Since the 3p orbital is on the Si-Si-Si plane, the degree of the interaction depends on the dihedral angle between adjacent Si-Si-Si planes. Fluctuation of the dihedral angles along the polymer skeleton then causes the so-called Anderson localization of the HOMO and LUMO [41]. [Pg.633]

Recently Shokoohi et al. (14) obtained high resolution LIF spectra from the photolysis of ICN at 266 nm. Using these spectra, they were able to show that the population of the and F2 spin components associated with each rotational level varied with both rotational and vibrational quantum number. For CN radicals with v" = 0 and N" < 43 the population of F- level < F level, for N" = 43 the population of F- level F level, and for N" > 43 the population of F- level > F2 level. In the v" = 1 level more of the CN radicals are produced in the upper N" levels than in the lower levels and for these upper levels the population of F-l level > F2 level. In the v" = 2 level, no radicals are observed below N" = 17, and the population of Fj level > F level. These results can be qualitatively understood in the following manner. The iodine atom can be produced in the /2 and the spin-orbit states. Spin-orbit interaction between... [Pg.42]

The spectra that are seen depend upon the relative strengths of the crystal field and the atomic interactions within the ion such as the Coulombic interactions between electrons and between electrons and the nucleus and the spin orbit interactions between the electrons and the nucleus. [Pg.139]

The chiral discrimination in the 2 1 complexes (homo vs. heterochiral ones) indicates that, in all the cases, the heterochiral complexes are more stable than the homochiral ones, except for the tert-butyl derivatives. The chiral discrimination energies were discussed on the basis of different parameters related to the lithium atom, such as the N-Li distance, the orbital interaction between the lone pair of the nitrogen and an empty orbital of the lithium, and its atomic contribution to the total energy of the complexes. [Pg.76]

The formed anomeric radical adopts both a form (equatorial radical) [I] and (3 form (axial radical) [II], and these are in equilibrium state. However, the (3 form radical is more reactive and nucleophilic, because of its orbital interaction between the singly occupied radical orbital and the axial lone-pair on the neighboring ring-oxygen atom (like aftfi-periplanar effect) [20-22]. Therefore, the (3 form radical (axial radical) [II] predominantly reacted with a hydrogen donor to generate p-O-glycoside. [Pg.201]

A covalent bond is formed between two atoms together in a molecular structure. It is formed when atomic orbitals overlap to produce a molecular orbital. For example, the formation of a hydrogen molecule (H2) from two hydrogen atoms. Each hydrogen atom has a half-filled Is atomic orbital and when the atoms approach each other, the atomic orbitals interact to produce two MOs (the number of resulting MOs must equal the number of original atomic orbitals) ... [Pg.36]

In heavy element compounds, spin-orbit interaction is of concern also for binding energies because the mutual spin-orbit interaction between molecular states will in general be smaller than in the dissociation limit. (Sometimes this is also addressed as quenching of SOC, although the interaction does not disappear completely.) Those molecular states that correlate with the lower spin-orbit component of a heavy element atomic state will therefore be more loosely bound. In contrast, the states that dissociate to the upper atomic spin-orbit level are stabilized by SOC. [Pg.159]

Chapter i described a covalent bond as a pair of electrons that is shared between two atoms. The purpose of this chapter is to reexamine bonding in more depth using a model that employs electron orbitals. This model will provide us with a better understanding of bonds and reactivity. The chapter begins with a review of atomic orbitals. Then a model where bonding results from atomic orbitals interacting to form molecular orbitals is discussed. Because resonance is so important in organic chemistry, considerable attention is devoted to this topic. The idea of orbitals can help us understand resonance better. Finally, a number of examples of how to use resonance and when it is important are presented. [Pg.61]

At first this picture suggests that the electrons will have to climb up to the empty orbital if it is higher in energy than tire filled orbital. This is not quite true because, when atomic orbitals interact, their energies split to produce two new molecular orbitals, one above and one below the old orbitals. This is the basis for the static structure of molecules described in the last chapter and is also tire key to reactivity. In these three cases this is what will happen when the orbitals interact (the new molecular orbitals are shown in black between the old atomic orbitals). [Pg.117]

In the phosphorescence process the spin-orbit interaction between the singlet-triplet manifolds is strongest for 1,3(ti, x") <- 3,1 (x, 7r ). This can be understood by the rotation of the lone-pair electron into the x-electron system by the spin-orbit operator. This type of atomic interaction motivates the approximations of one-electron, one-center spin-orbit operators cherished in semi-empirical work. The benzene-type of strong... [Pg.142]

According to the principle of dynamic adaptation (Likhtenshtein, 1976a), the multi-orbital interaction between a substrate and metal atoms in a bi- or polynuclear center and the consequent chemical conversion require a certain optimum flexibility of metal atoms involved in the catalytic process. Such flexibility would allow the space provision for each step of the consecutive chemical reaction, i.e. complexation, product formation and release. [Pg.94]

In the rock-salt stmcture, there are d-d orbital interactions between the 12 second-nearest neighbor metal atoms that must also be included. Figure 5.13 shows four of these dx -d cz interactions, two of which are if antibonding and two that are S bonding. The eight remaining d-d interactions are much weaker because of the poorer overlap... [Pg.233]

So far, we have considered primarily interactions between orbitals of identical energy. However, orbitals with similar, but not equal, energies interact if they have appropriate symmetries. We will outline two approaches to analyzing this interaction, one in which the molecular orbitals interact and one in which the atomic orbitals interact directly. [Pg.124]


See other pages where Atomic orbitals interactions between is mentioned: [Pg.127]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.302]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.338]    [Pg.357]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.359]    [Pg.639]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.258]    [Pg.266]    [Pg.268]    [Pg.269]    [Pg.270]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.451]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.224]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.657]    [Pg.302]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.1040]    [Pg.1040]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.504]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.2 , Pg.2 ]




SEARCH



Atomic interactions

Atomic orbital factors affecting interactions between

Atomic orbitals interaction

Orbital interaction between

© 2024 chempedia.info